IP Library Granted Patent US 9,242,641
Granted Patent B2
US 9,242,641 · App. 14/018,289 · Granted Jan 26, 2016

Dynamic allocation of drive torque

Inventors: Douglas Raymond Martin (Canton, MI); Ted Haladyna (Northville, MI); Kenneth James Miller (Canton, MI)
Assignee: Ford Global Technologies, LLC
B60W20/108B60W10/06B60W10/08B60W20/10B60W20/1082B60W30/1882B60W50/082B60W50/085B60K6/445B60W2050/0088B60W2540/04B60W2540/10B60W2540/106B60W2710/0666B60W2710/083Y10S903/902
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,242,641
App. No.
14/018,289
Granted
Jan 26, 2016
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods and systems are provided for dynamically allocating engine torque and motor torque in a hybrid vehicle to meet operator torque demand. The allocation is adjusted by constraining the maximum engine torque allowable under selected conditions to provide a better trade-off between performance and fuel economy. A maximum engine torque that provides best fuel economy is learned during engine operation at different engine speed-load conditions based on a deviation in spark retard torque ratio from a threshold ratio as spark timing is moved to MBT.

Claims (38)

1. A method for a hybrid electric vehicle, comprising:

dynamically limiting a maximum available engine torque based on each of an operator selected vehicle performance mode and a change in torque demand, the limiting includes selecting the maximum available torque limited between a first engine torque limit based on performance and a second engine torque limit based on fuel economy; and

providing motor torque to the vehicle based on the dynamic limiting of engine torque.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the second engine torque limit corresponds to a lower maximum available engine torque than the first engine torque limit.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the second engine torque limit is further based on engine vacuum demand.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the second engine torque limit based on fuel economy is learned relative to the first engine torque limit based on a spark retard torque ratio at or near the maximum available engine torque.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the second engine torque limit is decreased from the first engine torque limit when the spark retard torque ratio exceeds a first threshold and wherein the second engine torque limit is increased towards the first engine torque limit when the spark retard torque ratio falls below a second threshold, the second threshold lower than the first threshold.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the operator selected vehicle performance mode includes one of a first normal mode where vehicle performance is prioritized and a second economy mode where fuel economy is prioritized.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein an operator selects one of the first normal mode and the second economy mode by pressing a button coupled to a vehicle console.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein dynamically limiting based on the change in torque demand includes dynamically limiting based on a rate of change in torque demand.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the adjusting includes, in response to a lower rate of change in torque demand when operating in the first normal mode, selecting the second engine torque limit, in response to a higher rate of change in torque demand when operating in the first normal mode, selecting the first engine torque limit, and when operating in the second economy mode, selecting the second engine torque limit.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the lower rate of change in torque demand includes steady-state conditions and wherein the higher rate of change in torque demand includes transient conditions.

11. The method of claim 10 , further comprising, in response to the operator selecting the second economy mode during transient conditions while operating in the first performance mode, reducing the maximum available engine torque from the first engine torque limit to the second engine torque limit, and increasing motor torque from a vehicle battery to maximum motor torque.

12. The method of claim 9 , further comprising, during transient conditions when operating in the second economy mode, in response to the motor torque provided being at maximum motor torque, automatically shifting a maximum torque limit from the second engine torque limit to the first engine torque limit and indicating a failure mode.

13. A method for a hybrid vehicle, comprising:

receiving a vehicle performance mode selection from an operator;

estimating a rate of change in operator torque demand based on a pedal position;

selecting between a first and second maximum available engine torque limit based on each of the vehicle performance mode selection and the estimated rate of change in operator torque demand; and

adjusting a motor torque based on the selected torque limit to meet the operator torque demand.

14. The method of claim 13 , wherein receiving the vehicle performance mode selection from the operator includes the operator pressing a button coupled to a dashboard of the vehicle to select either a first, normal performance mode wherein torque output is prioritized or a second, economy mode wherein fuel economy is prioritized.

15. The method of claim 14 , wherein the second limit corresponds to a lower maximum available engine torque than the first limit, and wherein the selecting includes:

selecting the second limit in response to one of the first performance mode being selected and the estimated rate of change in operator torque demand being indicative of steady-state conditions, and the second economy mode being selected and the estimated rate of change in operator torque demand indicative of steady-state or transient conditions; and

selecting the first limit in response to the first performance mode being selected and the estimated rate of change in operator torque demand being indicative of transient conditions.

16. The method of claim 15 , further comprising, learning a deviation of the second limit from the first limit based on a deviation of a spark retard torque ratio from a threshold torque ratio as spark timing is moved towards MBT.

17. A hybrid vehicle system, comprising:

an electric motor coupled to a battery;

an engine;

vehicle wheels configured to receive engine torque from the engine and motor torque from the motor;

a vehicle console for receiving one or more inputs from a vehicle operator; and

a controller with computer readable instructions for:

operating the vehicle in a first mode with maximum engine torque more constrained during steady-state operating conditions when the operator input is indicative of performance requirement;

operating the vehicle in a second mode with maximum engine torque less constrained during transient operating conditions when the operator input is indicative of the performance requirement;

operating the vehicle in a third mode with maximum engine torque more constrained during steady-state operating conditions when the operator input is indicative of fuel economy requirement;

operating the vehicle in a fourth mode with maximum engine torque more constrained during transient operating conditions when the operator input is indicative of fuel economy requirement and the electric motor is operating below maximum motor torque output; and

operating the vehicle in a fifth mode with maximum engine torque less constrained during transient operating conditions when the operator input is indicative of fuel economy requirement and the electric motor is operating at maximum motor torque output.

18. The system of claim 17 , wherein the controller includes further instructions for, in response to the operator input indicative of fuel economy requirement received while operating the vehicle in the second mode, constraining the maximum engine torque and increasing the motor torque to meet an operator torque demand.

19. The system of claim 18 , wherein limiting the maximum engine torque includes reducing the maximum engine torque by an amount to move a spark retard torque ratio to a threshold torque ratio.

20. The system of claim 19 , wherein increasing the motor torque includes increasing the motor torque to a maximum motor torque limit with engine torque maintained at the limited maximum engine torque, and thereafter maintaining the motor torque at the maximum motor torque limit with the maximum engine torque more constrained while reducing total drive torque delivered to the vehicle wheels.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 4, 2013
From: MARTIN, DOUGLAS RAYMOND; HALADYNA, TED; MILLER, KENNETH JAMES
To: FORD GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Reel/Frame 031138/0097 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20150066265A1 · Mar 5, 2015