IP Library Granted Patent US 9,243,972
Granted Patent B2
US 9,243,972 · App. 12/953,720 · Granted Jan 26, 2016

Computer-implemented method to screen for longitudinal-seam anomalies

Inventors: Noel Duckworth (Richmond, TX); Ron Sherstan (Cypress, TX)
Assignee: Kinder Morgan, Inc.
G01M5/0033G01M5/0025G01M5/0091
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,243,972
App. No.
12/953,720
Granted
Jan 26, 2016
Kind
B2
Abstract

Embodiments of the present invention provide computer-implemented methods to detect crack-like features in pipeline welds using magnetic flux leakage data and pattern recognition. A screening process, for example, does not affect or change how survey data is recorded in survey tools; only how it is analyzed after the survey data is completed. Embodiments of the present invention can be used to screen for very narrow axial anomalies in the pipeline welds, and may also be used to predict the length of such anomalies. Embodiments of the present invention also produce a listing of the anomalies based on their relative signal characteristics.

Claims (44)

1. A computer-implemented method to detect longitudinal-seam anomalies in a pipeline weld of a pipeline, the computer-implemented method comprising:

(a) receiving magnetic flux leakage data by a computer, the magnetic flux leakage data being representative of potential cracks in a longitudinal pipeline weld;

(b) displaying the magnetic flux leakage data on a display associated with the computer;

(c) analyzing the magnetic flux leakage data by use of the computer associated with the display responsive to signal characteristics of the magnetic flux leakage data that may be indicators of the potential cracks, the signal characteristics indicative of at least a maximum length of the potential cracks;

(d) determining potential by use of the computer and associated display responsive to the analyzing of the magnetic flux leakage data;

(e) determining a validation dig list containing one or more cracks by use of the computer, wherein the list is used to identify areas along the pipeline to be further analyzed.

2. A computer-implemented method as defined in claim 1 , wherein the step of analyzing comprises determining display settings on the display, the display comprising a display screen and the display settings being responsive to different magnetic flux leakage characteristics, the determining of the display settings on the display screen including changing a gain and offset of the display screen in order increase contrast on the display so that the presence of the potential cracks readily may be perceived on the display screen.

3. A computer-implemented method as defined in claim 1 , wherein the step of determining potential cracks including listing data representative of potential cracks responsive to the signal characteristics.

4. A computer-implemented method as defined in claim 2 , wherein determining the display settings on the display further comprises:

changing a length of data being displayed on the display screen; and

changing an amount of data representing a pipeline circumference begin displayed on the display screen, the amount of data representing no more than ninety degrees of the pipeline circumference.

5. A computer-implemented method as defined in claim 1 , wherein the pipeline is comprised of steel and the potential cracks are crack air gaps, the crack air gaps being a function of crack length and depth, steel properties and hoop stress.

6. A computer-implemented method as defined in claim 1 , wherein the validation dig list of step (e) is used to identify areas along the pipeline to be visually inspected for cracks.

7. A computer-implemented method as defined in claim 2 , wherein the signal characteristics comprise one or more of the following:

(1) a smooth waveform;

(2) less than four anomaly channels;

(3) a non-erratic pattern; and

(4) being distinguished from other signals on the display screen when a gain of the pattern of magnetic flux leakage data increases.

8. A computer-implemented method defined in claim 2 , wherein the analyzing of the magnetic flux data performed by the computer further comprises:

(1) determining whether the magnetic flux leakage data is consistent with a first predetermined anomaly level by use of the computer and responsive to the display settings to thereby define a level one anomaly candidate, the first predetermined anomaly level having first selected signal characteristics consistent with the presence of longitudinal-seam anomalies;

(2) if the magnetic flux leakage data is consistent with the level one anomaly candidate, then determining if the level one anomaly candidate is consistent with a second predetermined anomaly level by use of the computer and responsive to the display settings, the second predetermined anomaly level defining a level two anomaly candidate having second selected signal characteristics different than the first selected signal characteristics and still consistent with the presence of longitudinal-seam anomalies;

(3) if the level one anomaly candidate is consistent with the level two anomaly candidate, then determining if the level two anomaly candidate is consistent with a third predetermined anomaly level by use of the computer and responsive to the display settings, the third predetermined anomaly level defining a level three anomaly candidate having third selected signal characteristics different than the first and second selected signal characteristics and yet still consistent with the presence of longitudinal-seam anomalies; and

(4) if the level two anomaly candidate is consistent with the third level anomaly candidate, then determining if the level three anomaly candidate is consistent with a fourth predetermined anomaly level by use of the computer and responsive to the display settings, the fourth predetermined anomaly level defining a level four anomaly candidate having fourth selected signal characteristics different than the first, second, and third selected signal characteristics and yet still consistent with the presence of longitudinal-seam anomalies.

9. A computer-implemented method to detect longitudinal-seam anomalies in a pipeline weld of a pipeline, the computer-implemented method comprising:

(a) receiving magnetic flux leakage data by a computer, the magnetic flux leakage data representative of potential cracks in a longitudinal pipeline weld;

(b) displaying the magnetic flux leakage data on a display connected to the computer;

(c) analyzing the magnetic flux leakage data by use of the computer and responsive to signal characteristics of the magnetic flux leakage data that may be indicators of the potential cracks, the signal characteristics indicative of at least a maximum length of the potential cracks, the analyzing of the magnetic flux data performed by the computer including:

(1) determining whether the magnetic flux leakage data is consistent with a first predetermined anomaly level by use of the computer to thereby define a level one anomaly candidate, the first predetermined anomaly level having first selected signal characteristics consistent with the presence of longitudinal-seam anomalies,

(2) if the magnetic flux leakage data is consistent with the level one anomaly candidate, then determining if the level one anomaly candidate is consistent with a second predetermined anomaly level by use of the computer, the second predetermined anomaly level defining a level two anomaly candidate having second selected signal characteristics different than the first selected signal characteristics and still consistent with the presence of longitudinal-seam anomalies,

(3) if the level one anomaly candidate is consistent with the level two anomaly candidate, then determining if the level two anomaly candidate is consistent with a third predetermined anomaly level by use of the computer, the third predetermined anomaly level defining a level three anomaly candidate having third selected signal characteristics different than the first and second selected signal characteristics and yet still consistent with the presence of longitudinal-seam anomalies, the third selected signal characteristics also being indicative of the presence of the selected critical flaw dimensions of a pipeline weld, and

(4) if the level two anomaly candidate is consistent with the third level anomaly candidate, then determining if the level three anomaly candidate is consistent with a fourth predetermined anomaly level by use of the computer, the fourth predetermined anomaly level defining a level four anomaly candidate having fourth selected signal characteristics different than the first, second, and third selected signal characteristics and yet still consistent with the presence of longitudinal-seam anomalies; and

(d) determining potential cracks by use of the computer and associated display responsive to the analyzing of the magnetic flux leakage data.

10. A computer-implemented method as defined in claim 9 , wherein the step of analyzing comprises determining display settings on the display, the display comprising a display screen and the display settings being responsive to different magnetic flux leakage characteristics, the determining of the display settings on the display screen including changing a gain and offset of the display screen in order to increase contrast on the display so that the presence of the potential cracks readily may be perceived on the display screen.

11. A computer-implemented method as defined in claim 9 , wherein the step of determining potential cracks including listing data representative of potential cracks responsive to the signal characteristics.

12. A computer-implemented method as defined in claim 11 , wherein determining the display settings on the display further comprises:

changing a length of data being displayed on the display screen; and

changing an amount of data representing a pipeline circumference begin displayed on the display screen, the amount of data representing no more than ninety degrees of the pipeline circumference.

13. A computer-implemented method as defined in claim 12 , wherein the pipeline is comprised of steel and the potential cracks are crack air gaps, the crack air gaps being a function of crack length and depth, steel properties and hoop stress.

14. A computer-implemented method as defined in claim 13 , further comprising the step of determining a validation dig list containing one or more cracks by use of the computer, whereby the list is used to identify areas along the pipeline to be visually inspected for cracks.

15. A computer-implemented method as defined in claim 14 , wherein the signal characteristics comprise one or more of the following:

(1) a smooth waveform;

(2) less than four anomaly channels;

(3) a non-erratic pattern; and

(4) being distinguished from other signals on the display screen when a gain of the pattern of magnetic flux leakage data increases.

Assignments (7)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT COLLATERAL AT REEL/FRAME NO. 028289/0397 Recorded May 6, 2014
From: BARCLAYS BANK PLC
To: KINDER MORGAN, INC.
Reel/Frame 032836/0185 →
GRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS Recorded May 29, 2012
From: KINDER MORGAN, INC.
To: BARCLAYS BANK PLC
Reel/Frame 028289/0397 →
MERGER Recorded Mar 28, 2012
From: KINDER MORGAN KANSAS, INC.
To: KINDER MORGAN HOLDCO DE INC.
Reel/Frame 027943/0419 →
MERGER Recorded Mar 28, 2012
From: KINDER MORGAN HOLDCO DE INC.
To: KINDER MORGAN, INC.
Reel/Frame 027943/0544 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Apr 5, 2011
From: KINDER MORGAN, INC.
To: KINDER MORGAN KANSAS, INC.
Reel/Frame 026079/0759 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Nov 24, 2010
From: KNIGHT, INC.
To: KINDER MORGAN, INC.
Reel/Frame 025419/0434 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 24, 2010
From: DUCKWORTH, NOEL; SHERSTAN, RON
To: KNIGHT, INC.
Reel/Frame 025419/0401 →
Continuity (7)
Continuation 12270432 · Nov 13, 2008
Continuation 12949896 · Nov 19, 2010
Continuation 12950118 · Nov 19, 2010
Division 12270432
Continuation 12270432
Provisional Application 61008822 · Dec 21, 2007
Related Publication 20110068782A1 · Mar 24, 2011