IP Library Granted Patent US 9,258,069
Granted Patent B2
US 9,258,069 · App. 14/348,627 · Granted Feb 9, 2016

Non-contiguous carrier aggregation

Inventors: Stefania Sesia (Roquefort les Pins, FR); Pierre Demaj (Nice, FR); Martial Gander (Les Arcs sur Argens, FR); Muhammad Kazmi (Bromma, SE)
Assignee: ST-ERICSSON SA
H04B17/21H04B17/318H04L1/0016H04L1/0026H04L1/20H04W24/08H04B1/0082H04L5/001H04W36/0088H04W72/085
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,258,069
App. No.
14/348,627
Granted
Feb 9, 2016
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method of operating a user equipment for measuring non-contiguous carriers comprises: changing a position of a local oscillator to be in the middle of the non-contiguous carriers; measuring the carriers simultaneously; estimating a power level of an interferer in a gap in the non-contiguous carriers which creates image interference; and compensating the measurement dependent on the interferer power level and an image rejection factor.

Claims (31)

1. A method of operating a user equipment for measuring non-contiguous carriers, the method comprising:

changing a position of a local oscillator to be in a middle of the non-contiguous carriers;

measuring the non-contiguous carriers simultaneously to generate a measurement;

estimating a power level of an interferer in a gap in the non-contiguous carriers that creates image interference; and

compensating the measurement dependent on the power level of the interferer and an image rejection factor.

2. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein compensating the measurement comprise compensating the measurement conditional on the power level of the interferer being less than a first threshold.

3. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein measuring the non-contiguous carriers comprises:

calculating a joint power and energy-per-chip to noise-plus-interference ratio for the non-contiguous carriers; and

computing a per-carrier power and energy-per-chip to noise-plus-interference ratio.

4. The method as claimed in claim 3 , wherein:

estimating the power level of the interferer comprises estimating the power level of the interferer that creates the image interference and computing a level of the image interference in one of the carriers; and

compensating the measurement comprises subtracting the level of the image interference from the per-carrier power and energy—per-chip to noise-plus-interference of the one of the carriers.

5. The method as claimed in claim 4 , wherein compensating the measurement comprises compensating the measurement conditional on a ratio of the power level of the interferer to the per-carrier power of the one of the carriers being less than a second threshold.

6. The method as claimed in claim 4 , further comprising:

computing a difference between a signal-to-noise ratio of the one of the carriers and an ideal signal-to-noise ratio of the one of the carriers with the image interference removed;

mapping the difference into a channel quality indicator (CQI) table to find an ideal CQI value the user equipment would support if the interferer was not there; and

informing a NodeB about a difference between a realistic CQI value and the ideal CQI value.

7. The method as claimed in claim 6 , wherein informing the NodeB comprises reporting the realistic CQI value and the ideal CQI value to the NodeB when requested by the NodeB.

8. The method as claimed in claim 7 , wherein the realistic CQI value and the ideal CQI value are multiplexed using code division multiplexing.

9. The method as claimed in claim 7 , wherein the realistic CQI value and the ideal CQI value are multiplexed using time division multiplexing.

10. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein measuring the non-contiguous carriers comprises measuring the non-contiguous carriers simultaneously during one measurement gap.

11. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the method is performed responsive to a request for the measurement received from a NodeB.

12. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the method is performed autonomously by the user equipment.

13. A user equipment configured to measure non-contiguous carriers, the user equipment comprising:

a receiver configured to receive the non-contiguous carriers;

a local oscillator;

a processing circuit configured to:

change a position of the local oscillator to be in a middle of the non-contiguous carriers;

measure the non-contiguous carriers simultaneously to generate a measurement;

estimate a power level of an interferer in a gap in the non-contiguous carriers that creates image interference; and

compensate the measurement dependent on the power level of the interferer and an image rejection factor.

Assignments (2)
STATUS CHANGE-ENTITY IN LIQUIDATION Recorded Feb 2, 2016
From: ST-ERICSSON SA
To: ST-ERICSSON SA, EN LIQUIDATION
Reel/Frame 037739/0493 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 31, 2014
From: SESIA, STEFANIA; DEMAJ, PIERRE; GANDER, MARTIAL; KAZMI, MUHAMMAD
To: ST-ERICSSON SA
Reel/Frame 032557/0547 →
Priority Claims (4)
EP 11306273 · Oct 3, 2011 · regional
EP 11306302 · Oct 7, 2011 · regional
EP 11306329 · Oct 13, 2011 · regional
EP 12175795 · Jul 10, 2012 · regional
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20140293818A1 · Oct 2, 2014