Systems and techniques for muting management in multi-cell coordination
Systems and techniques for negotiated control of multipoint coordination. A first device (such as a central entity or base station) signals a second device regarding its desire to assert control over, or readiness to accept control by, the second device, with respect to coordinated radio transmission. The negotiation may include, for example, acceptance of control, rejection of control, specification of resources subject to or exempt from control, and priority-based decisions to override or refrain from overriding rejections. Coordinated transmission is then conducted based on the outcome of the negotiation.
1. An apparatus comprising:
at least one processor;
memory storing a program of instructions;
wherein the memory storing the program of instructions is configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus to at least:
in response to a control assertion request to allow a controlling entity to control coordinated radio transmission by the apparatus, respond with an acceptance or denial of the request;
wherein acceptance or denial is with respect to specified radio resources less than the full bandwidth available for use; and
wherein coordination of transmission comprises muting of transmission or reduced power transmission, wherein a muted transmission constitutes a zero power transmission.
2. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the apparatus is further caused to: evaluate relative priorities between the apparatus and the controlling entity to determine the response;
if the controlling entity has a higher priority, respond with a denial and perform coordinated transmission under control of the controlling entity;
if the controlling entity has a lower priority, respond with an acceptance and perform transmission autonomously.
3. The apparatus of claim 2 , wherein the controlling entity is an eNodeB or an independent node.
4. The apparatus of claim 2 , wherein the priority of the controlling entity is configured by a network management function.
5. The apparatus of claim 2 , wherein the priority of the controlling entity is negotiated between the controlling entity and an eNodeB.
6. The apparatus of claim 2 , wherein priority decisions are made based on criteria so that one or more of the apparatus and the controlling entity has higher priority with respect to particular resources or traffic categories than with other resources or traffic categories.
7. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the apparatus is an eNodeB.
8. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein coordination of transmission comprises multi-cell coordinated scheduling for avoiding interference between base stations.
9. A method comprising:
in response to a control assertion request to allow a controlling entity to control coordinated radio transmission by a base station, responding with an acceptance or denial of the request;
wherein acceptance or denial is with respect to specified radio resources less than the full bandwidth available for use; and
wherein coordination of transmission comprises muting of transmission or reduced power transmission, wherein a muted transmission constitutes a zero power transmission.
10. The method of claim 9 , further comprising:
evaluating relative priorities between the base station and the controlling entity;
if the controlling entity has a higher priority, responding with an acceptance and perform coordinated transmission under control of the controlling entity; and
if the controlling entity has a lower priority, responding with a denial and performing transmission autonomously.
11. The method of claim 10 , wherein priority decisions are made based on criteria so that one or more of the apparatus and the controlling entity has higher priority with respect to particular resources or traffic categories than with other resources or traffic categories.
12. The method of claim 9 , wherein the base station is an eNodeB.
13. The method of claim 9 , wherein coordination of transmission comprises multi-cell coordinated scheduling for avoiding interference between base stations.
14. .A non-transitory computer readable medium storing a program of instructions, execution of which by a processor configures an apparatus to at least:
in response to a control assertion request to allow a controlling entity to control coordinated radio transmission by the apparatus, respond with an acceptance or denial of the request;
wherein acceptance or denial is with respect to specified radio resources less than the full bandwidth available for use; and
wherein coordination of transmission comprises muting of transmission or reduced power transmission, wherein a muted transmission constitutes a zero power transmission.
15. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 14 , wherein execution of the program of instructions further configures the apparatus to:
evaluate relative priorities between the apparatus and the controlling entity to determine the response;
if the controlling entity has a higher priority, respond with an acceptance and perform coordinated transmission under control of the controlling entity;
if the controlling entity has a lower priority, respond with an acceptance and perform transmission autonomously.
16. An apparatus comprising:
at least one processor;
memory storing a program of instructions;
wherein the memory storing the program of instructions is configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus to at least:
send a control assertion request to a base station, requesting control of coordinated radio transmission by the base station, wherein coordination of transmission comprises muting of transmission or reduced power of transmission, wherein a muted transmission comprises a zero power transmission; and
in response to acceptance of the request by the base station, wherein acceptance is with respect to specified radio resources less than the full bandwidth available for use, send one or more requests to the base station to mute transmission.
17. The apparatus of claim 16 , wherein the apparatus is further caused to, in response to denial of the request by the base station:
evaluate relative priorities between the apparatus and the base station;
if the priority of the apparatus is lower than that of the base station, refrain from attempting to control coordination by the base station; and
if the priority of the apparatus is higher than that of the base station, send one or more requests to the base station to mute transmission.
18. The apparatus of claim 16 , wherein the request for control identifies specified resources for control or exempts specified resources from control.
19. The apparatus of claim 18 , wherein the specified resources are physical resource blocks.
20. The apparatus of claim 16 , wherein the apparatus is further caused to send an updated control assertion request to the base station, specifying updated control parameters.