Method for optimizing catalyst loading for hydrocracking process
The invention relates to a method for optimizing layered catalytic processes. This is accomplished by testing various catalysts with a compound found in a feedstock to be tested, to determine the facility of the catalyst in hydrogenating, hydrosulfurizing, or hydrodenitrogenating the molecule, and hence the feedstock. In a preferred embodiment, the Double Bond Equivalence of the feedstock and molecule are determined, and catalysts are pre-selected based upon their known ability to work with materials of this DBE value.
1. A method for optimizing a layered hydrocracking catalytic process, comprising (i) contacting a model compound capable of (a) being hydrocracked as well as at least one of (ii) hydrogenation, hydrosulfurization and hydrodenitrogenation to a plurality of catalysts to determine an optimal catalyst for each of (i) and (ii), (b) following by layering the optimal catalysts for each of (i) and (ii) in a reaction chamber based on their activity reacting with said model compound, and (c) contacting a feedstock to the layered catalysts under condition favoring formation of lower weight hydrocarbon from said hydrocarbon containing feedstock, wherein said model compound boils in the range of 180° C.-520° C. and is selected from the group consisting of methylnaphthalene, dibenzothiophene, an alkylated or naphtalated derivative thereof, a basic nitrogen compound and a carbazole molecule.
2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining double bond equivalence (DBE,) of said feedstock, and contacting said model compound to a plurality of catalysts suitable for hydrocracking a substance with a DBE of said feedstock, to determine an optimum hydrocracking catalyst for said feedstock.
3. The method of claim 2 , further comprising contacting said model compound to a second plurality of catalysts suitable for hydrogenerating, hydrodesulfurizing, or hydrodenitrogenating a substance with a DBE value less than said feedstock to determine an optimal, second catalyst.
4. The method of claim 2 , wherein said hydrocarbons contained in said feedstock have a double bond equivalency of 24 or less.
5. The method of claim 2 , wherein said feedstock has a double bond equivalency of 24 or less, and at least one of said catalysts for VGO hydrocracking catalyst.
6. The method of claim 2 , wherein said feedstock has a double bond equivalency of 25 or more, and at least one of said catalysts is a catalyst designed for heavy feedstock.
7. The method of claim 1 , comprising contacting said hydrocarbon containing feedstock to said reaction chamber at a temperature of from 350° C. to 450° C.
8. The method of claim 1 , comprising contacting said hydrocarbon containing feedstock to said reaction chamber at a hydrogen feed rate less than 2500 liters per liter of feedstock.
9. The method of claim 1 , comprising contacting said hydrocarbon containing feedstock to said reaction vessel at a pressure of from 100 bars to 200 bars.
10. The method of claim 1 , wherein at least one of said catalysts contains a metal from Group VI, VII or VIIIB of the periodic table, or is a noble metal.
11. The method of claim 10 , wherein said metal is Co, Ni, W, Mo, Pt, or Pd.
12. The method of claim 1 , wherein at least one of said catalysts contains amorphous alumina, silica-alumina, titanium, Y zeolite, or at least one a transition metal inserted Y zeolite.
13. The method of claim 12 , wherein said transition metal is Zr, Ti, Hf and combination thereof.
14. The method of claim 1 , wherein said molecule is capable of being at least two of hydrogenated, hydrodesulfurized, and Itydrodenitrogenated.
15. The method of claim 1 , wherein said molecule is capable of being hydrogenated, hdrodesulfurized, and hydrodenitrogenated.