IP Library › Granted Patent US 9,424,313
Granted Patent B2
US 9,424,313 · App. 14/566,953 · Granted Aug 23, 2016

Many-core algorithms for in-memory column store databases

Inventors: Jonathan Dees (Karlsruhe, DE); Peter Sanders (Karlsruhe, DE); Franz Faerber (Walldorf, DE); Jochen Seidel (Zurich, CH)
Assignee: SAP SE
G06F17/30463G06F17/30466
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,424,313
App. No.
14/566,953
Granted
Aug 23, 2016
Kind
B2
Abstract

A pattern can be identified in at least part of a query whose definition is received in a query request. The identified pattern can be matched with a set of pre-defined patterns, each of which has associated therewith at least one pre-compiled query execution sub-component of a plurality of pre-compiled query execution sub-components retained in a library. A plan for executing the query can be generated, for example by incorporating the pre-compiled query execution sub-component associated with the matched pattern into the plan based on a pseudo code representation of the plan derived from the definition.

Claims (46)

1. A non-transitory computer program product storing instructions that, when executed by at least one programmable processor, cause the at least one programmable processor to perform operations comprising:

receiving a query request comprising a definition of a query of a database persisted in a column-based storage;

identifying a pattern in at least part of the query;

matching the identified pattern with a set of pre-defined patterns, each of the pre-defined patterns having associated therewith at least one pre-compiled query execution sub-component of a plurality of pre-compiled query execution sub-components retained in a library;

selecting, based on the matching of the identified patterns, an optimal sequence for processing a plurality of tables that must be joined to respond to the query that avoids intermediate results and allows for the query to be performed in a single pass of the database, wherein at least one matching pattern other than the selected matched pattern produces intermediate results that requires more than two passes of the database;

generating, based on the matching, a plan for executing the query; and

executing the query using the generated plan.

2. A computer program product as in claim 1 , wherein the operations further comprise

selecting, based on the matching of the identified patterns with the set of pre-defined patterns, an optimal sequence for processing a plurality of tables that must be joined to respond to the query; and

configuring the plan to include the optimal sequence for processing the plurality of tables.

3. A computer program product as in claim 1 , wherein the generating comprises incorporating the pre-compiled query execution sub-component associated with the matched pattern into the plan based on a pseudo code representation of the plan derived from the definition.

4. A computer program product as in claim 3 , wherein the operations further comprise deriving the pseudo code representation of the plan from the definition.

5. A computer program product as in claim 1 , wherein the generating comprises creating a single function to call the pre-compiled query execution component and the one or more other pre-compiled query execution components to generate the plan.

6. A computer program product as in claim 5 , wherein the single function defines a desired result and accesses a predefined parallelization plan from a set of two or more predefined parallelization plans based at least in part of the matching of the identified pattern.

7. A computer program product as in claim 1 , wherein the pre-compiled query execution sub-component comprises one or more pre-compiled SQL operations expressed in C++.

8. A system comprising:

at least one programmable processor; and

a machine-readable medium storing instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the at least one programmable processor to perform operations comprising:

receiving a query request comprising a definition of a query of a database persisted in a column-based storage;

identifying a pattern in at least part of the query;

matching the identified pattern with a set of pre-defined patterns, each of the pre-defined patterns having associated therewith at least one pre-compiled query execution sub-component of a plurality of pre-compiled query execution sub-components retained in a library;

selecting, based on the matching of the identified patterns, an optimal sequence for processing a plurality of tables that must be joined to respond to the query that avoids intermediate results and allows for the query to be performed in a single pass of the database, wherein at least one matching pattern other than the selected matched pattern produces intermediate results that requires more than two passes of the database;

generating, based on the matching, a plan for executing the query; and

executing the query using the generated plan.

9. A system as in claim 8 , wherein the operations further comprise:

selecting, based on the matching of the identified patterns with the set of pre-defined patterns, an optimal sequence for processing a plurality of tables that must be joined to respond to the query; and

configuring the plan to include the optimal sequence for processing the plurality of tables.

10. A system as in claim 8 , wherein the generating comprises incorporating the pre-compiled query execution sub-component associated with the matched pattern into the plan based on a pseudo code representation of the plan derived from the definition.

11. A system as in claim 10 , wherein the operations further comprise deriving the pseudo code representation of the plan from the definition.

12. A system as in claim 8 , wherein the generating further comprises creating a single function to call the pre-compiled query execution component and the one or more other pre-compiled query execution components to generate the plan.

13. A system as in claim 12 , wherein the single function defines a desired result and accesses a predefined parallelization plan from a set of two or more predefined parallelization plans based at least in part of the matching of the identified pattern.

14. A system as in claim 8 , wherein the pre-compiled query execution sub-component comprises one or more pre-compiled SQL operations expressed in C++.

15. A computer-implemented method comprising:

receiving a query request comprising a definition of a query of a database persisted in a column-based storage;

identifying a pattern in at least part of the query;

matching the identified pattern with a set of pre-defined patterns, each of the pre-defined patterns having associated therewith at least one pre-compiled query execution sub-component of a plurality of pre-compiled query execution sub-components retained in a library;

selecting, based on the matching of the identified patterns, an optimal sequence for processing a plurality of tables that must be joined to respond to the query that avoids intermediate results and allows for the query to be performed in a single pass of the database, wherein at least one matching pattern other than the selected matched pattern produces intermediate results that requires more than two passes of the database;

generating, based on the matching, a plan for executing the query; and

executing the query using the generated plan.

16. A computer-implemented method as in claim 15 , further comprising:

selecting, based on the matching of the identified patterns with the set of pre-defined patterns, an optimal sequence for processing a plurality of tables that must be joined to respond to the query; and

configuring the plan to include the optimal sequence for processing the plurality of tables.

17. A computer-implemented method as in claim 15 , further comprising deriving a pseudo code representation of the plan from the definition.

18. A computer-implemented method as in claim 15 , wherein the generating further comprises creating a single function to call the pre-compiled query execution component and the one or more other pre-compiled query execution components to generate the plan.

19. A computer-implemented method as in claim 18 , wherein the single function defines a desired result and accesses a predefined parallelization plan from a set of two or more predefined parallelization plans based at least in part of the matching of the identified pattern.

20. A computer-implemented method as in claim 15 , wherein the pre-compiled query execution sub-component comprises one or more pre-compiled SQL operations expressed in C++, wherein at least one of the receiving, the identifying, the matching, the generating, and the executing is performed by at least one programmable processor.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 8, 2016
From: DEES, JONATHAN; SANDERS, PETER; FAERBER, FRANZ; SEIDEL, JOCHEN
To: SAP SE
Reel/Frame 037443/0387 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation 13332189 · Dec 20, 2011
Related Publication 20150095309A1 · Apr 2, 2015