IP Library › Granted Patent US 9,506,417
Granted Patent B2
US 9,506,417 · App. 14/255,824 · Granted Nov 29, 2016

Methods for detecting high pressure pump bore wear

Inventors: Joseph Norman Ulrey (Dearborn, MI); Ross Dykstra Pursifull (Dearborn, MI); Mark Meinhart (South Lyon, MI); Gopichandra Surnilla (West Bloomfield, MI)
Assignee: Ford Global Technologies, LLC
F02D41/3845F02D41/221F02D41/08F02D41/3094F02D2041/1433F02D2041/225F02D2200/0614F02M59/102F02M63/029F02M65/002
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,506,417
App. No.
14/255,824
Granted
Nov 29, 2016
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods are provided for detecting high pressure pump bore wear, wherein wear between a piston and bore of a pump may cause an excessive amount of fuel to leak out of a compression chamber of the pump. A reliable method is needed that involves a pump performance model that incorporates a number of physical effects and is verified by real high pressure pump test data. A method is proposed that involves comparing a target pump rate based on the pump performance model to a real fuel injection rate in order to determine if an abnormal amount of fuel may be leaking from the high pressure pump.

Claims (37)

1. A method, comprising:

while an engine is at an idling speed:

increasing pressure in a direct injection fuel rail of the engine to a threshold fuel rail pressure;

computing a target pump rate of a high pressure fuel pump based on a pump performance model;

computing a fuel injection rate;

comparing the target pump rate and the fuel injection rate; and

issuing a piston-bore interface leak result based on the comparison.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the piston-bore interface leak result is abnormal if the comparison determines that the target pump rate is higher than the fuel injection rate by more than a margin.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the margin includes a value of uncertainty.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the piston-bore interface leak result is normal if the comparison determines that the target pump rate is equal to or lower than the fuel injection rate plus a margin.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the margin includes a value of uncertainty.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the pump performance model is calculated based on fuel loss due to bulk modulus of the fuel and a dead volume of a compression chamber of the high pressure fuel pump, normal leak through the piston-bore interface, and a miscellaneous cause.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the pump performance model is calculated by a controller with computer readable instructions stored in non-transitory memory, the controller located on-board a vehicle with the engine.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the fuel injection rate is computed based on measurements from one or more sensors of the engine.

9. A method, comprising:

upon completion of an initiation condition and while an engine is at an idling speed:

increasing pressure in a direct injection fuel rail of the engine to a threshold fuel rail pressure;

computing a target pump rate of a high pressure fuel pump based on a pump performance model;

computing a fuel injection rate;

comparing the target pump rate and the fuel injection rate; and

diagnosing a piston-bore interface as abnormally leaking if the target pump rate is higher than the fuel injection rate by more than a margin.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the margin includes a value of uncertainty.

11. The method of claim 9 , wherein the pump performance model is calculated based on fuel loss due to bulk modulus of the fuel and a dead volume of a compression chamber of the high pressure fuel pump, normal leak through the piston-bore interface, and a miscellaneous cause.

12. The method of claim 9 , wherein the pump performance model is calculated by a controller with computer readable instructions stored in non-transitory memory, the controller located on-board a vehicle with the engine.

13. The method of claim 9 , wherein the fuel injection rate is computed based on measurements from one or more sensors of the engine.

14. The method of claim 9 , wherein the initiation condition includes a starting command by a person, an automatic starting command by an engine controller, or a starting command issued every time the engine enters the idling condition.

15. A fuel system, comprising:

one or more direct fuel injectors configured to inject fuel into one or more cylinders of an engine;

a fuel rail fluidly coupled to the one or more direct fuel injectors;

a high pressure fuel pump fluidly coupled to the fuel rail; and

a controller with computer readable instructions stored in non-transitory memory for:

while an engine is at an idling speed, increasing pressure in the fuel rail, computing a target pump rate of the high pressure fuel pump based on a pump performance model, computing a fuel injection rate, comparing the target pump rate and the fuel injection rate, and issuing a piston-bore interface leak result based on the comparison.

16. The fuel system of claim 15 , wherein the piston-bore interface leak result is abnormal if the comparison determines that the target pump rate is higher than the fuel injection rate by more than a margin.

17. The fuel system of claim 16 , wherein the margin includes a value of uncertainty.

18. The fuel system of claim 15 , wherein the piston-bore interface leak result is normal if the comparison determines that the target pump rate is lower than the fuel injection rate plus a margin.

19. The fuel system of claim 18 , wherein the margin includes a value of uncertainty.

20. The fuel system of claim 18 , wherein an amount of fuel leakage corresponding to the normal piston-bore interface leak result lubricates the high pressure fuel pump.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 17, 2014
From: ULREY, JOSEPH NORMAN; PURSIFULL, ROSS DYKSTRA; MEINHART, MARK; SURNILLA, GOPICHANDRA
To: FORD GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Reel/Frame 032703/0985 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20150300287A1 · Oct 22, 2015