IP Library Granted Patent US 9,587,629
Granted Patent B2
US 9,587,629 · App. 14/319,269 · Granted Mar 7, 2017

Methods and systems to operate a wind turbine system using a non-linear damping model

Inventors: Ameet Shridhar Deshpande (Schenectady, NY); Pranav Agarwal (Guilderland, NY)
Assignee: General Electric Company
F03D7/0296F03D7/0224F03D9/002F03D7/045F05B2260/821F05B2270/404Y02E10/723
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,587,629
App. No.
14/319,269
Granted
Mar 7, 2017
Kind
B2
Abstract

A wind turbine system is presented. The wind turbine system includes a tower, a plurality of blades, a rotor supported by the tower and rotatably coupled to the plurality of blades, a control unit programmed to predict a net energy of the tower at one or more future points in time, and if the predicted net energy is within a design limit, then continue with baseline operating control models for normal operation of the wind turbine system, if the predicted net energy exceeds the design limit, then use a non-linear tower damping model to generate tower damping commands to control tower damping of the wind turbine system.

Claims (335)

1. A wind turbine system, comprising:

a tower having at least one sensor mounted thereon;

a plurality of blades;

a rotor supported by the tower and rotatably coupled to the plurality of blades;

a control unit programmed to:

determine a current deflection of the tower, a current fore-aft velocity of the tower, and a current acceleration of the tower based on information sensed by the at least one sensor;

determine a predicted deflection of the tower as a function of the current deflection of the tower, the current fore-aft velocity of the tower and the current acceleration of the tower;

determine a predicted tower-load-moment indicative parameter of the tower, wherein the predicted tower-load-moment indicative parameter comprises a predicted net energy of the tower, where a net energy of the tower includes a net potential energy of the tower, a net kinetic energy of the tower, or a total of the net potential energy of the tower and the net kinetic energy of the tower; and

compare the predicted tower-load-moment indicative parameter of the tower to a design limit,

wherein, if the predicted tower-load-moment indicative parameter is within the design limit, then a baseline operating control model is used by the control unit for normal operation of the wind turbine system; and

wherein, if the predicted tower-load-moment indicative parameter exceeds the design limit, then a non-linear tower damping model is used by the control unit to determine a non-linear variable damping coefficient to prevent damage to the tower; and

wherein the non-linear damping model is configured to generate a tower damping command in phase with the current fore-aft velocity of the tower; and

wherein the tower damping command comprises a blade pitch angle alteration command.

2. The wind turbine system of claim 1 , wherein the blade pitch angle alteration command is determined by the following equation:

θ

add

=

Ϛ

*

ω

*

X

.

0

*

M

/

(

Fz

Aero

θ

)

where,

θ add is the blade pitch angle alteration command;

ζ is the non-linear variable damping coefficient;

φ is a natural frequency of the tower;

{dot over (X)} 0 is the current fore-aft velocity of the tower;

M is a modal mass of the tower;

Fz Aero is an aerodynamic rotor thrust; and

Fz

Aero

θ

is a sensitivity of the aerodynamic rotor thrust with respect to a pitch angle, θ, of the plurality of blades.

3. The wind turbine system of claim 2 , wherein the blade pitch angle alteration command comprises a collective pitch angle alteration command for all of the plurality of blades.

4. The wind turbine system of claim 2 , wherein the blade pitch angle alteration command comprises an individual pitch angle alteration command for each of the plurality of blades.

5. The wind turbine system of claim 1 , wherein the blade pitch angle alteration command is determined by the following equation:

θ

add

=

θ

rate

T

left

where,

θ add is the blade pitch angle alteration command;

θ rate is a pitch rate to prevent damage to the tower; and

T left is a remaining amount of time before damage occurs to the tower.

6. A wind turbine system, comprising:

a tower having at least one sensor mounted thereon;

a plurality of blades;

a rotor supported by the tower and rotatably coupled to the plurality of blades;

a control unit programmed to:

determine a current fore-aft deflection of the tower, a current fore-aft velocity of the tower, and a current fore-aft acceleration of the tower based on information sensed by the at least one sensor;

determine a predicted deflection of the tower as a function of the current fore-aft deflection of the tower, the current fore-aft velocity of the tower and the current acceleration of the tower;

determine a predicted net energy of the tower, wherein a net energy of the tower comprises a net potential energy of the tower, a net kinetic energy of the tower, or a total of the net potential energy of the tower and the net kinetic energy of the tower; and

compare the predicted net energy of the tower to a design limit,

wherein, if the predicted net energy is within the design limit, then a baseline operating control model is used by the control unit for normal operation of the wind turbine system; and

wherein, if the predicted net energy exceeds the design limit, then a non-linear tower damping model is used by the control unit to determine a non-linear variable damping coefficient to prevent damage to the tower,

wherein the non-linear variable damping coefficient is a function of an energy reduction factor and a remaining amount of time before damage occurs to the tower,

wherein the energy reduction factor is determined using the following equation:

E ratio =R predicted /R max

where,

E ratio is the energy reduction factor;

R predicted is the predicted net energy of the tower; and

R max is the design limit.

7. The wind turbine system of claim 6 , wherein the design limit, R max , comprises a maximum potential energy of the tower at a maximum tower deflection limit of the tower.

8. The wind turbine system of claim 6 , wherein the predicted net energy is determined by the following equation:

R predicted =√{square root over ((ω Y dim ) 2 +X dim 2 )}

where,

R predicted is the predicted net energy of the tower;

ω is a natural frequency of the tower;

Y dim is a first dimensionless parameter; and

X dim is a second dimensionless parameter.

9. The wind turbine system of claim 8 , wherein the first dimensionless parameter, Y dim , is determined by the following equation:

Y

dim

=

ω

y

predicted

-

Fz

aero

/

K

y

max

-

Fz

aero

/

K

where,

y predicted is the predicted tower deflection;

K is a modal stiffness of the tower;

y max is a maximum deflection of the tower in a fore-aft direction; and

Fz aero is aerodynamic rotor thrust, and

wherein the second dimensionless parameter, X dim , is determined by the following equation:

X

dim

=

X

°

0

ω

(

y

max

-

Fz

aero

/

K

)

where

X 0 is the current fore-aft deflection of the tower;

{dot over (X)} 0 is the current fore-aft velocity of the tower; and

ω is the natural frequency of the tower.

10. The wind turbine system of claim 6 , wherein the predicted net energy is determined by the following equation:

Net

Energy

=

0.5

*

(

K

*

(

X

0

-

Fz

aero

K

)

2

)

+

0.5

*

M

*

X

°

0

2

where,

Net Energy is the predicted net energy;

K is a modal stiffness of the tower;

X 0 is the current fore-aft deflection of the tower;

{dot over (X)} 0 is the current fore-aft velocity of the tower;

Fz aero is an aerodynamic rotor thrust; and

M is a modal mass of the tower.

11. The wind turbine system of claim 6 , wherein the remaining amount of time before damage occurs to the tower is determined by the following equation:

T

left

=

θ

predicted

ω

where,

T left is the remaining amount of time before damage occurs to the tower;

θ predicted is an angular representation of the remaining amount of time before damage occurs to the tower; and

ω is a natural frequency of the tower.

12. The wind turbine system of claim 11 , wherein the angular representation of the remaining amount of time before damage occurs to the tower, θ predicted , is determined by the following equation:

θ

predicted

=

tan

-

1

(

ω

X

dim

Y

dim

)

where,

Y dim is a first dimensionless parameter; and

X dim is a second dimensionless parameter.

13. The wind turbine system of claim 12 , wherein the first dimensionless parameter, Y dim , is determined by the following equation:

Y

dim

=

ω

y

predicted

-

Fz

aero

/

K

y

max

-

Fz

aero

/

K

where,

y predicted is a predicted deflection of the tower;

K is a modal stiffness of the tower;

y max is a maximum deflection of the tower;

Fz aero is an aerodynamic thrust of the rotor, and

wherein the second dimensionless parameter, X dim , is determined by the following equation:

X

dim

=

X

°

0

ω

(

y

max

-

Fz

aero

/

K

)

where,

X 0 is the current fore-aft deflection of the tower; and

{dot over (X)} 0 is the current fore-aft velocity of the tower.

14. The wind turbine system of claim 13 , wherein the predicted deflection of the tower is determined by the following equation:

y

predicted

=

X

0

+

(

X

°

0

*

T

)

+

(

1

2

X

°°

0

*

T

2

)

where,

T is a future time (sec); and

is the current fore-aft acceleration of the tower.

15. The wind turbine system of claim 6 , wherein the non-linear damping coefficient, ζ, is determined by the following equation:

Ϛ

(

θ

predicted

,

E

ratio

)

=

max

(

0

,

min

(

1

,

(

Π

/

2

)

3

2

*

ln

(

E

ratio

)

(

θ

predicted

-

Π

/

2

)

3

)

)

where,

θ predicted is an angular representation of the remaining amount of time before damage occurs to the tower; and

E ratio is the energy reduction factor.

16. A method of operating a wind turbine system, the wind turbine system comprising a tower having at least one sensor mounted thereon, a plurality of blades, a rotor supported by the tower and rotatably coupled to the plurality of blades, and a control unit; the method comprising:

determining, in the control unit of the wind turbine system, a current fore-aft deflection of the tower, a current fore-aft velocity of the tower, and a current fore-aft acceleration of the tower based on information sensed by the at least one sensor of the wind turbine system;

determining, in the control unit of the wind turbine system, a predicted deflection of the tower as a function of the current fore-aft deflection of the tower, the current fore-aft velocity of the tower and the current fore-aft acceleration of the tower;

determining, in the control unit of the wind turbine system, a predicted tower-load-moment indicative parameter of the tower, wherein the predicted tower-load-moment indicative parameter comprises a predicted net energy of the tower, where a net energy of the tower includes a net potential energy of the tower, a net kinetic energy of the tower, or a total of the net potential energy of the tower and the net kinetic energy of the tower; and

comparing the predicted tower-load-moment indicative parameter of the tower to a design limit,

wherein, if the predicted tower-load-moment indicative parameter is within the design limit, then a baseline operating control model is used by the control unit for normal operation of the wind turbine system;

wherein, if the predicted tower-load-moment indicative parameter exceeds the design limit, then a non-linear tower damping model is used by the control unit to determine a non-linear variable damping coefficient to prevent damage to the tower;

wherein the non-linear damping model is configured to generate a tower damping command in phase with the current fore-aft velocity of the tower; and

wherein the tower damping command comprises a blade pitch angle alteration command.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 17, 2023
From: GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
To: GE INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGY LLC
Reel/Frame 065727/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 30, 2014
From: DESHPANDE, AMEET SHRIDHAR; AGARWAL, PRANAV
To: GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
Reel/Frame 033211/0477 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20150377213A1 · Dec 31, 2015