Method and apparatus for controlling an actuatable restraining device using multi-region enhanced discrimination
A method for controlling an actuatable restraining device includes sensing a plurality of crash event indications, classifying crash events in response to the sensed crash event indications to identify at least one of a forward rigid barrier crash event, an offset deformable barrier crash event, an angular crash event, and a small overlap crash event, and controlling deployment timing of the actuatable restraining device in response to the classification of the crash event.
1. A method for controlling an actuatable restraining device comprising the steps of:
sensing a plurality of crash event indications;
classifying crash events in response to comparing the sensed crash event indications against one another to identify at least one of a forward rigid barrier crash event, an offset deformable barrier crash event, an angular crash event, and a small overlap crash event; and
controlling deployment timing of the actuatable restraining device in response to the classification of the crash event.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of controlling further includes the steps of establishing a logic control switch value table using the classified crash events having a plurality of logic control switch values responsive to the event classifications and using the logic control switch values to reduce deployment timing of the actuatable restraining device.
3. The method of claim 2 wherein each of a plurality of the logic control switch values for at least one classified crash event is determined by comparing the sensed crash event indications against one another and against threshold values.
4. The method of claim 3 wherein each of the plurality of the logic control switch values for at least one classified crash event is determined by plotting the sensed crash event indications as a function of one another and against the threshold values.
5. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of sensing the plurality of crash events includes sensing crash acceleration in the vehicle's longitudinal direction at two opposite remote side locations of the vehicle and wherein the step of classifying crash events compares a first crash velocity value determined from one of the two opposite remote side locations against a second crash velocity value determined from the other of the two opposite remote side locations, the event classification being defined by the result of the comparison.
6. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of sensing the plurality of crash events includes sensing crash acceleration in the vehicle's longitudinal direction at two opposite crush zone locations of the vehicle and wherein the step of classifying crash events compares a first crash velocity value determined from one of the two opposite crush zone locations against a second crash velocity value determined from the other of the two opposite crush zone locations, the event classification being defined by the result of the comparison.
7. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of sensing the plurality of crash events includes sensing crash acceleration in the vehicle's lateral direction and crash acceleration in longitudinal direction at a remote side location of the vehicle and wherein the step of classifying crash events includes determining a crash displacement value from the sensed crash acceleration in the longitudinal direction and comparing the sensed crash acceleration value in the vehicle's lateral direction against the determined crash displacement value in the longitudinal direction, the crash event classification being determined by the result of the comparison.
8. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of sensing the plurality of crash events includes sensing crash acceleration in the vehicle's longitudinal direction at a remote side location of the vehicle and wherein the step of classifying crash events includes determining a crash velocity value and a crash displacement value from the sensed crash acceleration in the longitudinal direction and comparing the determined crash velocity value as a function of the determined crash displacement value, the crash event classification being determined by the result of the comparison.
9. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of classifying crash events comprises classifying crash events in response to comparing the sensed crash event indications against one another.
10. A method for controlling an actuatable restraining device comprising the steps of:
sensing a plurality of crash event indications;
classifying crash events in response to comparing the sensed crash event indications against one another to identify a small overlap crash event; and
controlling deployment timing of the actuatable restraining device in response to the classification of the crash event.
11. The method of claim 10 wherein the step of classifying crash events comprises classifying crash events in response to comparing the sensed crash event indications against one another.
12. A method for controlling an actuatable restraining device comprising the steps of:
sensing a plurality of crash event indications;
classifying crash events in response to comparing the sensed crash event indications against one another; and
controlling deployment timing of the actuatable restraining device in response to the classification of the crash event using a base deployment control algorithm and an enhanced deployment algorithm wherein the enhanced deployment algorithm monitors for a small overlap crash event.
13. The method of claim 12 wherein the step of classifying crash events comprises classifying crash events in response to comparing the sensed crash event indications against one another.
14. An apparatus for controlling an actuatable restraining device comprising:
a plurality of sensors for sensing a plurality of crash event indications; and
a controller for classifying crash events in response to comparing the sensed crash event indications against one another to identify at least one of a forward rigid barrier crash event, an offset deformable barrier crash event, an angular crash event, and a small overlap crash event and controlling deployment timing of the actuatable restraining device in response to the classification of the crash event.
15. The apparatus of claim 14 wherein said controller includes a logic control switch value table using the classified crash events having a plurality of logic control switch values responsive to the event classifications, the logic control switch values being used to reduce deployment timing of the actuatable restraining device.
16. The apparatus of claim 15 wherein each of a plurality of the logic control switch values for at least one classified crash event is determined by comparing the sensed crash event indications against one another and against threshold values.
17. The apparatus of claim 16 wherein each of the plurality of the logic control switch values for at least one classified crash event is determined by plotting the sensed crash event indications as a function of one another and against the threshold values.
18. The apparatus of claim 14 wherein the sensors sense crash acceleration in the vehicle's longitudinal direction at two opposite remote side locations of the vehicle and wherein the controller compares a first crash velocity value determined from one of the two opposite remote side locations against a second crash velocity value determined from the other of the two opposite remote side locations, the event classification being defined by the result of the comparison.
19. The apparatus of claim 14 wherein the sensors sense crash acceleration in the vehicle's longitudinal direction at two opposite crush zone locations of the vehicle and wherein the controller compares a first crash velocity value determined from one of the two opposite crush zone locations against a second crash velocity value determined from the other of the two opposite crush zone locations, the event classification being defined by the result of the comparison.
20. The apparatus of claim 14 wherein the sensors sense crash acceleration in the vehicle's lateral direction and crash acceleration in longitudinal direction at a remote side location of the vehicle and wherein the controller determines a crash displacement value from the sensed crash acceleration in the longitudinal direction and comparing the sensed crash acceleration value in the vehicle's lateral direction against the determined crash displacement value in the longitudinal direction, the crash event classification being determined by the result of the comparison.
21. The apparatus of claim 14 wherein the sensors sense crash acceleration in the vehicle's longitudinal direction at a remote side location of the vehicle and wherein the controller determines a crash velocity value and a crash displacement value from the sensed crash acceleration in the longitudinal direction and comparing the determined crash velocity value as a function of the determined crash displacement value, the crash event classification being determined by the result of the comparison.
22. The apparatus of claim 14 wherein the controller classifies crash events in response to comparing the sensed crash event indications against one another.
23. An apparatus for controlling an actuatable restraining device comprising:
a plurality of sensors for sensing a plurality of crash event indications; and
a controller for classifying crash events in response to comparing the sensed crash event indications against one another to identify a small overlap crash event and controlling deployment timing of the actuatable restraining device in response to the classification of the crash event.
24. The apparatus of claim 23 wherein the controller classifies crash events in response to comparing the sensed crash event indications against one another.
25. An apparatus for controlling an actuatable restraining device comprising:
a plurality of sensors for sensing a plurality of crash event indications; and
a controller for controlling the actuatable restraining device in response to comparing the sensed crash event indications against one another, said controller including a base deployment algorithm for controlling the actuatable restraining device in response to comparing the sensed crash event indications against one another and further including an enhanced deployment algorithm for comparing the sensed crash event indications against one another to classify crash events indications to determine if a small overlap crash event is occurring, said enhanced deployment algorithm decreasing timing of the actuation of the restraining device relative to control provided by the base deployment algorithm when a small overlap crash event is classified.
26. The apparatus of claim 25 wherein said plurality of sensors includes crush zone acceleration sensors mounted in a forward crush zone are of the vehicle and remote located side acceleration sensors mounted in opposite located side structures of the vehicle.
27. The apparatus of claim 26 wherein the crush zone acceleration sensors and the remote located side acceleration sensors are all multi-axis acceleration sensors capable of measuring acceleration in a longitudinal axis of the vehicle and a lateral axis of the vehicle.
28. The apparatus of claim 25 wherein the controller controls the actuatable restraining device in response to comparing the sensed crash event indications against one another.