IP Library Granted Patent US 9,701,404
Granted Patent B2
US 9,701,404 · App. 14/321,443 · Granted Jul 11, 2017

Method and apparatus for aircraft sensor and actuator failure protection using reconfigurable flight control laws

Inventors: Shyhpyng Jack Shue (Grapevine, TX); John James Corrigan (Coppell, TX); Eric Thomas Bird (Weatherford, TX); Tommie Lynn Wood (Arlington, TX); Alan Carl Ewing (Keller, TX)
Assignee: Textron Innovations Inc.
B64C27/54B64C19/00G05B19/0428G05B23/0289G05D1/0077G05D1/0858G05B2219/24192G05B2219/25069
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,701,404
App. No.
14/321,443
Granted
Jul 11, 2017
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method and apparatus for reconfiguring flight control of an aircraft during a failure while the aircraft is flying. The method and apparatus provide a control law that is software-implemented and configured to automatically send flight control data to a mixing/mapping matrix. The method and apparatus also provide a reconfiguration management tool configured to communicate with the mixing/mapping matrix in order to safely transfer authority from a failed actuator to a back-up actuator. The method and apparatus also provide a sensor management tool for providing input to the reconfiguration management tool in order to smooth any transient conditions that may occur during reconfiguration. The method and apparatus provide for a way of smoothing any possible transient situation that might otherwise occur by employment of a fader, the fader being used to gradually convert positioning of failed actuators and positioning of reconfigured actuators. An exemplary aircraft for using the method and apparatus of a reconfigurable flight control system is a quad tilt rotor. The quad tilt rotor provides a variety of redundant and back-actuators, as such, having a robust and highly qualified reconfigurable flight control system is very desirable.

Claims (28)

1. A method of automatically reconfiguring flight control of an aircraft, comprising:

detecting a failure of a yaw control actuator;

calculating a risk factor;

determining whether reconfiguration is necessary based upon the risk factor;

transferring flight control authority from the yaw control actuator to a back-up actuator;

providing a sensor management tool;

generating differential thrust with the back-up actuator for yaw control; and

managing the transfer of flight control authority to the back-up actuators;

wherein the manacling the transfer of flight control authority to the back-up actuator step is accomplished by the sensor management tool.

2. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising:

mixing and mapping the use of the yaw control actuator and the back-up actuator by continuously changing the percentage usage of each actuator on the aircraft.

3. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the risk factor takes into consideration a control power level.

4. A method of automatically reconfiguring flight control of an aircraft, comprising:

detecting a failure of a first actuator;

calculating a risk factor;

seamlessly transferring flight control authority from a failed first actuator to a second actuator;

generating differential thrust with the second actuator for differential control; and

managing the transfer of flight control authority to the second actuators;

wherein the risk factor takes into consideration a control power level.

5. The method according to claim 4 , further comprising:

providing a sensor management tool;

wherein the managing the transfer of flight control authority to the second actuator step is accomplished by the sensor management tool.

6. The method according to claim 4 , further comprising:

mixing and mapping the use of the first actuator and the second actuator by continuously changing the percentage usage of each actuator on the aircraft.

7. The method according to claim 4 , wherein the differential control is utilized for yaw control.

8. The method according to claim 4 , further comprising:

determining whether reconfiguration is necessary based upon the risk factor;

wherein the risk factor is an empirical representation of a control authority of the aircraft, such that a degradation in the control authority effects the risk factor.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 27, 2014
From: SHUE, SHYHPYNG JACK; CORRIGAN, JOHN JAMES; BIRD, ERIC THOMAS; WOOD, TOMMIE LYNN; EWING, ALAN CARL
To: BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON INC.
Reel/Frame 033620/0578 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 27, 2014
From: BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON INC.
To: TEXTRON INNOVATIONS INC.
Reel/Frame 033620/0879 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 14017129 · Sep 3, 2013
Continuation 13121458 · Mar 29, 2011
Provisional Application 61102630 · Oct 3, 2008
Related Publication 20140316615A1 · Oct 23, 2014