IP Library Granted Patent US 9,983,285
Granted Patent B2
US 9,983,285 · App. 14/709,089 · Granted May 29, 2018

High spatial and temporal resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

Inventors: Peng Hu (Los Angeles, CA); Stanislas Rapacchi (Los Angeles, CA)
Assignee: THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
G01R33/5601G01R33/4822G01R33/5611G01R33/5635G06T11/006G06T2207/10096
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,983,285
App. No.
14/709,089
Granted
May 29, 2018
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for high spatial and temporal resolution dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging using a random subsampled Cartesian k-space using a Poisson-disk random pattern acquisition strategy and a compressed sensing reconstruction algorithm incorporating magnitude image subtraction is presented. One reconstruction uses a split-Bregman minimization of the sum of the L1 norm of the pixel-wise magnitude difference between two successive temporal frames, a fidelity term and a total variation (TV) sparsity term.

Claims (233)

1. A method of contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography, the method comprising:

(a) acquiring a first series of magnetic resonance imaging data sets of a subject from a scanner without contrast by randomly under-sampling Cartesian k-space;

(b) acquiring a second series of magnetic resonance imaging data sets of a subject from a scanner in the presence of contrast by randomly under-sampling Cartesian k-space; and

(c) reconstructing images from the acquired data sets with a split-Bregman minimization of the sum of the L1 norm of the pixel-wise magnitude difference between two successive temporal frames, a fidelity term and a total variation (TV) sparsity term.

2. A method as recited in claim 1 , further comprising performing a preliminary low definition reconstruction to assess timing before performing a high definition reconstruction to produce final magnetic resonance images.

3. A method as recited in claim 2 , wherein said first series and said second series of magnetic resonance data sets are acquired using an acquisition technique selected from the group consisting of time-resolved imaging with stochastic trajectories (TWIST), time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics (TRICKS) and time resolved angiography using keyhole (TRAK).

4. A method as recited in claim 1 , further comprising optimizing weighting parameters by retrospectively under-sampling the k-space and minimizing root mean square error between original k-space images and reconstructed images.

5. A method as recited in claim 4 , further comprising normalizing acquired data by maximum image intensity prior to image reconstruction.

6. A method as recited in claim 1 , wherein said random under-sampling of Cartesian k-space uses variable density Poisson-disk random patterns.

7. A method as recited in claim 1 , wherein said reconstruction further comprises minimizing cost function for a volume by dividing a cost function into multiple Bregman distances and updating the distances according to a norm and a threshold.

8. A method as recited in claim 1 , wherein said reconstruction from said datasets comprises solving:

(

I

1

,

I

2

)

=

argmin

{

U

1

F

(

I

1

)

-

K

1

2

2

+

λ

TV

(

I

1

)

+

μ

I

2

e

i

ϕ

1

-

I

1

1

U

2

F

(

I

2

)

-

K

2

2

2

+

λ

TV

(

I

2

)

+

μ

I

2

-

I

1

e

i

ϕ

2

1

}

wherein fidelity terms ∥U 1 F(I 1 )−K 1 ∥ 2 2 and ∥U 2 F(I 2 )−K 2 ∥ 2 2 compare the Fourier transform (F) of the estimated images (I 1 and I 2 ) to measured samples (K 1 and K 2 ) using sampling masks (U 1 and U 2 );

wherein the total variation terms λTV(I 1 ) and λTV(I 2 ) are the L1-norm of the discrete gradients of I 1 and I 2 ; and

wherein the ∥I 2 |e iφ 1 −I 1 | 1 and |I 2 −|I 1 |e iφ 2 | 1 terms are the L1 norm of the pixel-wise magnitude subtracted image: ∥I 2 |−|I 1 ∥ 1 =∥I 2 |e iφ 1 −I 1 | 1 =|I 2 −I 1 |e iφ 2 | 1 .

9. A method of contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography, the method comprising:

(a) acquiring a first series of magnetic resonance imaging data sets of a subject from a scanner without contrast by randomly under-sampling Cartesian k-space using variable density Poisson-disk random patterns;

(b) acquiring a second series of magnetic resonance imaging data sets of a subject from a scanner in the presence of contrast by randomly under-sampling Cartesian k-space using variable density Poisson-disk random patterns; and

(c) reconstructing images from the acquired data sets by solving:

(

I

1

,

I

2

)

=

argmin

{

U

1

F

(

I

1

)

-

K

1

2

2

+

λ

TV

(

I

1

)

+

μ

I

2

e

i

ϕ

1

-

I

1

1

U

2

F

(

I

2

)

-

K

2

2

2

+

λ

TV

(

I

2

)

+

μ

I

2

-

I

1

e

i

ϕ

2

1

}

wherein fidelity terms ∥U 1 F(I 1 )−K 1 ∥ 2 2 and ∥U 2 F(I 2 )−K 2 ∥ 2 2 compare the Fourier transform (F) of the estimated images (I 1 and I 2 ) to measured samples (K 1 and K 2 ) using sampling masks (U 1 and U 2 );

wherein the total variation terms λTV(I 1 ) and λTV(12) are the L1-norm of the discrete gradients of I 1 and I 2 ; and

wherein the ∥I 2 |e iφ 1 −I 1 | 1 and |I 2 −|I 1 |e iφ 2 | 1 terms are the L1 norm of the pixel-wise magnitude subtracted image: ∥I 2 |−|I 1 ∥ 1 =∥I 2 |e iφ 1 −I 1 | 1 =|I 2 −I 1 |e iφ 2 | 1 .

10. A method as recited in claim 9 , further comprising optimizing weighting parameters by retrospectively under-sampling the k-space and minimizing root mean square error between original k-space images and reconstructed images.

11. A method as recited in claim 10 , further comprising normalizing acquired data by maximum image intensity prior to image reconstruction.

12. A method as recited in claim 10 , further comprising: plotting a sampling trajectory on a ky-kz plane in k-space; and sampling k-space at the beginning of each temporal frame to motion sensitivity and eddy currents that can affect imaging.

13. A method as recited in claim 12 , wherein said sampling trajectory is a spiral pattern centered at the center of k-space.

Assignments (2)
CONFIRMATORY LICENSE Recorded Dec 16, 2015
From: UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES
To: NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (NIH), U.S. DEPT. OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (DHHS), U.S. GOVERNMENT
Reel/Frame 037302/0488 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 10, 2015
From: HU, PENG; RAPACCHI, STANISLAS
To: THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Reel/Frame 035815/0200 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation PCTUS2013069466 · Nov 11, 2013
Provisional Application 61725016 · Nov 11, 2012
Related Publication 20150346303A1 · Dec 3, 2015