IP Library › Granted Patent US 10,025,319
Granted Patent B2
US 10,025,319 · App. 15/252,389 · Granted Jul 17, 2018

Collision-warning system

Inventors: Nanjun Liu (Ann Arbor, MI); Jerry H. Engelman (Plymouth, MI); Ahsan Qamar (Canton, MI); Timothy Drotar (Commerce Township, MI); Kun Deng (Ann Arbor, MI); Alex Maurice Miller (Canton, MI)
Assignee: FORD GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
G05D1/0289G05D1/0214G05D1/0223G08G1/166
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,025,319
App. No.
15/252,389
Granted
Jul 17, 2018
Kind
B2
Abstract

A controller includes a processor and a memory storing processor-executable instructions in a host vehicle. The processor is programmed to designate a target vehicle as a collision risk upon determining that an intersection angle between the host vehicle and the target vehicle is between preset lower and upper bounds and an absolute value of an azimuth angle rate of change of the host vehicle is below a preset threshold.

Claims (32)

1. A controller comprising a processor and a memory storing processor-executable instructions in a host vehicle such that the processor is programmed to:

designate a target vehicle as a collision risk upon determining that

an intersection angle between the host vehicle and the target vehicle is between preset lower and upper bounds and

an absolute value of an azimuth angle rate of change of the host vehicle is below a preset threshold; and

control a vehicle subsystem to evade the target vehicle if designated as a collision risk.

2. The controller of claim 1 , wherein the processor is further programmed to determine whether the target vehicle is within a preset range of the host vehicle.

3. The controller of claim 1 , wherein the preset lower bound is greater than zero degrees.

4. The controller of claim 3 , wherein the preset upper bound is less than 180 degrees.

5. The controller of claim 1 , wherein controlling the vehicle subsystem includes instructing brakes to brake.

6. The controller of claim 1 , wherein controlling the vehicle subsystem includes instructing a steering system to turn.

7. The controller of claim 1 , wherein the processor is further programmed to confirm the collision risk independently of the azimuth angle rate of change of the host vehicle.

8. The controller of claim 1 , wherein the processor is further programmed to instruct a vehicle subsystem to evade the target vehicle if designated as a collision risk and if the collision risk is confirmed independently of the azimuth angle rate of change of the host vehicle.

9. The controller of claim 1 , wherein the processor is further programmed to calculate a threat score based on the preset threshold and the azimuth angle rate of change of the host vehicle.

10. A method comprising:

designating a target vehicle as a collision risk upon determining that

an intersection angle between a host vehicle and the target vehicle is between preset lower and upper bounds and

an absolute value of an azimuth angle rate of change of the host vehicle is below a preset threshold; and

controlling, by a computer controller, a vehicle subsystem to evade the target vehicle if designated as a collision risk.

11. The method of claim 10 , further comprising determining whether the target vehicle is within a preset range of the host vehicle.

12. The method of claim 10 , wherein the preset lower bound is greater than zero degrees.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein the preset upper bound is less than 180 degrees.

14. The method of claim 10 , wherein controlling the vehicle subsystem includes instructing brakes to brake.

15. The method of claim 10 , wherein controlling the vehicle subsystem includes instructing a steering system to turn.

16. The method of claim 10 , further comprising confirming the collision risk independently of the azimuth angle rate of change of the host vehicle.

17. The method of claim 10 , further comprising instructing a vehicle subsystem to evade the target vehicle if designated as a collision risk and if the collision risk is confirmed independently of the azimuth angle rate of change of the host vehicle.

18. The method of claim 10 , further comprising calculating a threat score based on the preset threshold and the azimuth angle rate of change of the host vehicle.

19. A controller comprising a processor and a memory storing processor-executable instructions in a host vehicle such that the processor is programmed to:

designate a target vehicle as a collision risk upon determining that

an intersection angle between the host vehicle and the target vehicle is between preset lower and upper bounds and

an absolute value of an azimuth angle rate of change of the host vehicle is below a preset threshold; and

instruct a vehicle subsystem to evade the target vehicle if designated as a collision risk and if the collision risk is confirmed independently of the azimuth angle rate of change of the host vehicle.

20. The controller of claim 19 , wherein instructing the vehicle subsystem includes at least one of instructing brakes to brake and instructing a steering system to turn.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 31, 2016
From: DENG, KUN; DROTAR, TIMOTHY; ENGELMAN, JERRY H.; LIU, NANJUN; MILLER, ALEX MAURICE; QAMAR, AHSAN
To: FORD GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Reel/Frame 039599/0092 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20180059686A1 · Mar 1, 2018