IP Library Granted Patent US 10,070,444
Granted Patent B2
US 10,070,444 · App. 14/361,904 · Granted Sep 4, 2018

Coordinated spectrum allocation and de-allocation to minimize spectrum fragmentation in a cognitive radio network

Inventors: Christian Markwart (Munich, DE); Ruediger Halfmann (Otterberg, DE)
Assignee: NOKIA SOLUTIONS AND NETWORKS OY
H04W72/0493H04W72/00
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,070,444
App. No.
14/361,904
Granted
Sep 4, 2018
Kind
B2
Abstract

An apparatus and a method are described, by which a fragmentation probability is determined which indicates a probability of fragmentation of frequency resources in at least one network section for at least one network operating entity. Moreover, an apparatus and a method are described, by which frequency resources in at least one network section are allocated and/or de-allocated, priorities of frequency resources are defined for at least one network operating entity individually, and allocating and/or de-allocating of the frequency resources for the at least one network operating entity is performed based on the priorities. For allocating and/or de-allocating of the frequency resources, also the fragmentation probability may be taken into account.

Claims (51)

1. An apparatus comprising:

at least one processor; and

at least one memory including computer program code, the at least one memory and the computer program code configured, with the at least one processor, to cause the apparatus at least to

define priorities for use of one or more frequency resources for a first network operating entity and one or more second network operating entities individually, the first network operating entity operating a first part of one of more radio access networks and each of the one or more second network operating entities operating a respective second part of the one or more radio access networks; and

allocate and/or de-allocate at least one of the one or more frequency resources for the first network operating entity for use in the first part of the one or more radio access networks based on the priorities,

wherein fragmentation probability information is used to define the priorities, and

wherein the fragmentation probability information depends on overlapping between the first part of the one or more radio access networks and at least one second part of the one or more radio access networks.

2. The apparatus according to claim 1 , wherein

a plurality of basic scenarios for overlappings of a cell to other cells is defined, and the processor is configured to determine the fragmentation probability by referring to the basic scenarios.

3. The apparatus according to claim 1 , wherein the at least one processor and the at least one memory including computer program code are further configured to cause the apparatus to

determine a fragmentation probability for the first network operating entity and the one or more second network operating entities separately.

4. The apparatus according to claim 1 , wherein the at least one processor and the at least one memory including computer program code are further configured to cause the apparatus to:

define a start frequency resource for the first network operating entity, and

define a highest priority for the start frequency resource for the first network operating entity.

5. The apparatus according to claim 4 , wherein the at least one processor and the at least one memory including computer program code are further configured to cause the apparatus to

define priorities for subsequent frequency resources neighbouring the start frequency source with priorities in descending order.

6. The apparatus according to claim 1 , wherein the at least one processor and the at least one memory including computer program code are further configured to cause the apparatus to

define priorities for frequency resources based on one or more of the following rules:

a neighbour frequency resource is given higher priority than other frequency resources, and/or

a neighbour frequency resource in a group of subsequent frequency resource which are not allocated is given a higher priority.

7. The apparatus according to claim 1 , wherein

the at least one processor and the at least one memory including computer program code are further configured to cause the apparatus to

give priority to frequency resources owned by the first network operating entity when allocating frequency blocks to the first network operating entity.

8. The apparatus according to claim 1 , wherein the at least one processor and the at least one memory including computer program code are further configured to cause the apparatus to

define priorities for frequency resources based on rules comprising:

for neighbour frequency resource groups of subsequent frequency resources having the same length, fragmentation probability is used to define the priority.

9. The apparatus according to claim 1 , wherein the at least one processor and the at least one memory including computer program code are further configured to cause the apparatus to

define priorities for frequency resources based on rules comprising:

a direction of giving priorities to frequency resources is fixed until no more free frequency block is available or the direction is determined on said rules.

10. A method comprising:

defining priorities for use of one or more frequency resources for a first network operating entity and one or more second network operating entities individually, the first network operating entity operating a first part of one or more radio access networks and each of the one or more second network operating entities operating a respective second part of the one or more radio access networks; and

allocating and/or de-allocating at least one of the one or more frequency resources for the first network operating entity for use in the first part of the one or more radio access networks based on the priorities,

wherein fragmentation probability information is used to define the priorities, and

wherein the fragmentation probability information depends on overlapping between the first part of the one or more radio access networks and at least one second part of the one or more radio access networks.

11. The method according to claim 10 , wherein

a plurality of basic scenarios for overlappings of a cell to other cells is defined, and the fragmentation probability is determined by referring to the basic scenarios.

12. The method according to claim 10 , further comprising

defining a start frequency resource for each the first network operating entity, and

defining a highest priority for the start frequency resource for the first network operating entity.

13. The method according to claim 12 , further comprising

defining priorities for subsequent frequency resources neighbouring the start frequency source with priorities in descending order.

14. The method according to claim 10 , wherein priorities for frequency resources are defined based on one or more of the following rules:

a neighbour frequency resource is given higher priority than other frequency resources, and/or

a neighbour frequency resource in a group of subsequent frequency resource which are not allocated is given a higher priority.

15. A computer program product comprising a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium bearing computer program code embodied therein for use with a computer, the computer program code comprising code for performing the method of claim 10 .

16. The method according to claim 10 , wherein

a fragmentation probability for the first network operating entity and the one or more second network operating entities is determined separately.

17. The method according to claim 10 , wherein the definition of priorities for frequency resources is based on rules comprising:

for neighbour frequency resource groups of subsequent frequency resources having the same length, fragmentation probability is used to define the priority.

18. The method according to claim 10 , wherein the definition of priorities for frequency resources is based on rules comprising:

a direction of giving priorities to frequency resources is fixed until no more free frequency block is available or the direction is determined based on said rules.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 30, 2014
From: MARKWART, CHRISTIAN; HALFMANN, RUEDIGER
To: NOKIA SOLUTIONS AND NETWORKS OY
Reel/Frame 032997/0809 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20140307701A1 · Oct 16, 2014
Cited By (200+)
US 12,192,775 US 12,192,776 US 12,192,777 US 12,192,778 US 12,200,500 US 12,207,097 US 12,212,973 US 12,212,974 US 12,219,364 US 12,219,365 US 12,225,386 US 12,231,902 US 12,231,903 US 12,231,904 US 12,231,905 US 12,231,906 US 12,238,526 US 12,238,527 US 12,245,044 US 12,245,045 US 12,245,046 US 12,250,558 US 12,250,559 US 12,256,225 US 12,256,226 US 12,256,227 US 12,256,228 US 12,262,211 US 12,262,212 US 12,262,213 US 12,262,214 US 12,262,215 US 12,262,217 US 12,267,688 US 12,267,692 US 12,273,726 US 12,273,727 US 12,273,728 US 12,273,729 US 12,273,730 US 12,273,731 US 12,273,734 US 12,279,126 US 12,279,127 US 12,284,526 US 12,284,527 US 12,284,528 US 12,289,601 US 12,289,602 US 12,289,603 US 12,289,604 US 12,294,865 US 12,294,866 US 12,294,867 US 12,302,111 US 12,302,112 US 12,302,113 US 12,302,114 US 12,302,115 US 12,302,119 US 12,309,598 US 12,309,599 US 12,309,600 US 12,309,601 US 12,309,602 US 12,309,603 US 12,309,604 US 12,309,605 US 12,309,608 US 12,317,089 US 12,317,090 US 12,317,093 US 12,323,811 US 12,323,812 US 12,323,813 US 12,323,814 US 12,323,815 US 12,328,589 US 12,328,590 US 12,328,591 US 12,328,592 US 12,335,742 US 12,335,743 US 12,342,174 US 12,348,973 US 12,348,974 US 12,348,975 US 12,348,976 US 12,363,548 US 12,363,549 US 12,363,550 US 12,369,039 US 12,369,040 US 12,369,043 US 12,375,930 US 12,375,931 US 12,375,932 US 12,375,933 US 12,382,297 US 12,382,298 US 12,382,299 US 12,382,300 US 12,382,302 US 12,382,303 US 12,389,232 US 12,389,233 US 12,395,851 US 12,395,852 US 12,395,853 US 12,395,854 US 12,395,856 US 12,395,857 US 12,402,013 US 12,402,014 US 12,413,984 US 12,425,869 US 12,425,870 US 12,432,569 US 12,432,570 US 12,432,571 US 12,439,263 US 12,439,264 US 12,439,265 US 12,439,270 US 12,445,855 US 12,445,856 US 12,445,857 US 12,445,858 US 12,452,680 US 12,452,681 US 12,452,682 US 12,452,683 US 12,452,684 US 12,452,686 US 12,457,501 US 12,464,364 US 12,464,365 US 12,464,366 US 12,464,371 US 12,470,938 US 12,470,939 US 12,470,940 US 12,470,944 US 12,477,349 US 12,483,897 US 12,483,898 US 12,490,102 US 12,490,103 US 12,490,104 US 12,490,105 US 12,495,305 US 12,495,306 US 12,495,307 US 12,501,270 US 12,501,271 US 12,501,272 US 12,501,273 US 12,501,275 US 12,507,073 US 12,507,074 US 12,507,075 US 12,507,076 US 12,513,528 US 12,520,162 US 12,526,640 US 12,538,134 US 12,543,048 US 12,549,953 US 12,549,954 US 12,549,955 US 12,563,402 US 12,563,403 US 12,563,404 US 12,563,407 US 12,568,380 US 12,574,742 US 12,574,743 US 12,574,744 US 12,574,745 US 12,574,746 US 12,574,754 US 12,574,755 US 12,581,314 US 12,581,315 US 12,581,316 US 12,587,865 US 12,587,866 US 12,598,473 US 12,598,474 US 12,598,475 US 12,604,198 US 12,604,199 US 12,604,200 US 12,604,201 US 12,604,202 US 12,604,203 US 12,604,206 US 12,610,242 US 12,610,243 US 12,610,244