IP Library › Granted Patent US 10,236,981
Granted Patent B2
US 10,236,981 · App. 15/648,895 · Granted Mar 19, 2019

Adjustment of control parameters of section of optical fiber network

Inventors: James Harley (Nepean, CA); Kim B. Roberts (Ottawa, CA); David Boertjes (Nepean, CA)
Assignee: Ciena Corporation
H04B10/2504H04B10/07955H04B10/27H04J14/0221H04J14/0275
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,236,981
App. No.
15/648,895
Granted
Mar 19, 2019
Kind
B2
Abstract

A processor of an apparatus is configured to apply one or more control algorithms using estimated data to adjust the one or more control parameters of a section of an optical fiber network. The estimated data are derived from measurements of optical signals in the section and from knowledge of the section. The estimated data is a function of optical nonlinearity and of amplified spontaneous emission.

Claims (23)

1. An apparatus comprising:

circuitry to support an optical service channel; and

a processor configured

to evaluate gradients of an objective function using measurements of optical signals in a section of an optical fiber network and using estimated data derived from the measurements and from knowledge of the section, wherein the estimated data is a function of optical nonlinearity and of amplified spontaneous emission; and

to apply one or more control algorithms using at least the gradients to adjust one or more control parameters of the section,

wherein application of the one or more control algorithms to adjust the one or more control parameters comprises adjusting the one or more control points in a direction of one or more dimensions of those gradients.

2. The apparatus as recited in claim 1 , wherein the processor is a shelf processor.

3. The apparatus as recited in claim 1 , wherein the apparatus comprises wavelength selective switch (WSS) functionality.

4. The apparatus as recited in claim 1 , wherein the apparatus comprises an optical amplifier device.

5. The apparatus as recited in claim 1 , wherein the measurements include a total output power.

6. The apparatus as recited in claim 1 , wherein the measurements include per-channel optical power or power spectral density.

7. The apparatus as recited in claim 6 , wherein the measurements of per-channel optical power or power spectral density are taken at fewer geographic locations than a number of geographic sites in the section having optical amplifier devices.

8. The apparatus as recited in claim 1 , wherein the control parameters include per-channel power control.

9. The apparatus as recited in claim 8 , wherein the control parameters include loss values of a wavelength selective switch (WSS) node in the section.

10. The apparatus as recited in claim 1 , wherein the control parameters include total power control.

11. The apparatus as recited in claim 1 , wherein the control parameters include per-channel power control and total power control, and the control algorithm to adjust per-channel power control is substantially decoupled from the control algorithm to adjust total power control.

12. The apparatus as recited in claim 1 , wherein the estimated data includes estimated per-channel optical power or estimated power spectral density at the output of one or more optical amplifier devices in the section.

13. The apparatus as recited in claim 1 , wherein the optical signals comprise two or more bands of channels that are independently amplified through the section, and optimization of the objective function jointly optimizes over all channels of the two or more bands.

14. The apparatus as recited in claim 13 , wherein the objective function is configured to minimize degradations through the section.

15. The apparatus as recited in claim 14 , wherein optimization of the objective function minimizes a weighted sum of ratios of the total noise power from amplified spontaneous emission and optical nonlinearities to the power of the optical signals.

16. The apparatus as recited in claim 1 , wherein the objective function is configured to maximize capacity or reliability or both of the optical fiber network by reallocating margin between channels.

17. The apparatus as recited in claim 16 , wherein the objective function incorporates a concave value function of margin of one or more channels propagated through the section.

18. The apparatus as recited in claim 1 , wherein the optical fiber network comprises multiple sections, and multiple instances of the one or more control algorithms operate in parallel.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 22, 2017
From: HARLEY, JAMES; ROBERTS, KIM B; BOERTJES, DAVID
To: CIENA CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 043354/0323 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation 15603810 · May 24, 2017
Related Publication 20180343059A1 · Nov 29, 2018
Cited By (2)
US 12,495,230 US 12,647,705