Packaging material profiling for containment force-based wrapping

1. A method of profiling a packaging material with a load wrapping apparatus of the type configured to wrap a load on a load support through relative rotation between a packaging material dispenser and the load support, the method comprising:

initiating a first load wrap operation to wrap with the packaging material using a first wrap force parameter;

determining a first incremental containment force per revolution (ICF) value from the first load wrap operation;

initiating a second load wrap operation to wrap with the packaging material using a second wrap force parameter;

determining a second ICF value from the second load wrap operation; and

using a central processing unit, determining an ICF function for the packaging material from the first and second ICF values, the ICF function configured to receive an input wrap force parameter and generate an ICF output value therefrom, and the ICF function configured to generate the ICF output value over a range of wrap force parameters.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first and second wrap load operations are first and second calibration wrap operations.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the ICF function includes determining an ICF value at a predetermined wrap force parameter and a slope, wherein the ICF function is a linear function.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

initiating a third load wrap operation to wrap with the packaging material using a third wrap force parameter; and

determining a third ICF value from the third load wrap operation, wherein the ICE function is additionally determined from the third ICF value.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the ICF function is an s-curve function.

6. The method of claim 4 , wherein the ICE function is a piecewise linear function.

7. The method of claim 4 , wherein the ICF function is selected from the group consisting of an exponential function, a multi-order polynomial function, a logarithmic function, a moving average function, a power function, and an interpolated function.

8. The method of claim 1 , farther comprising storing the ICF function in a packaging material profile.

9. The method of claim 8 , further comprising:

determining a packaging material width; and

storing the packaging material width in the packaging material profile.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein determining the packaging material width includes determining the packaging material width based upon a width of a portion of the packaging material applied subsequent to at least one of the first and second load wrap operations.

11. The method of claim 8 , further comprising:

determining a packaging material weight; and

storing the packaging material weight in the packaging material profile.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein determining the packaging material weight includes determining the packaging material weight based upon a weight of the packaging material applied subsequent to at least one of the first and second load wrap operations.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein determining the packaging material weight includes removing and weighing the packaging material applied to a load subsequent to at least one of the first and second load wrap operations.

14. The method of claim 8 , further comprising:

determining a wrap force limit for the packaging material; and

storing the wrap force limit in the packaging material profile.

15. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the first ICF value includes:

applying a predetermined number of layers during the first load wrap operation;

determining a containment force applied during the first load wrap operation; and

dividing the containment force by the predetermined number of layers to determine the first ICF value.

16. The method of claim 15 , wherein determining the containment force applied during the first load wrap operation includes measuring the containment force with a containment force measuring device.

17. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first and second wrap force parameters differ by at least 10%.

18. The method of claim 17 , further comprising:

receiving the first wrap force parameter in response to input data;

receiving the second wrap force parameter in response to input data; and

comparing the first and second wrap force parameters to determine that the first and second wrap force parameters differ by at least 10%.

19. The method of claim 1 , further comprising presenting a plurality of computer-generated displays to an operator to guide the operator through the first and second load wrap operations.