IP Library Granted Patent US 10,278,967
Granted Patent B2
US 10,278,967 · App. 15/894,520 · Granted May 7, 2019

Acetate salt of buprenorphine and methods for preparing buprenorphine

Inventors: C. Frederick M. Huntley (East Greenwich, RI); Erik Wayne Kataisto (Coventry, RI); Helge Alfred Reisch (Westerly, RI); Archana Sharma (East Greenwich, RI)
Assignee: Rhodes Technologies
A61K31/485A61P25/04C07D489/12C07B2200/13
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,278,967
App. No.
15/894,520
Granted
May 7, 2019
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present disclosure provides acetate salts of buprenorphine, and its anhydrates, solvates, hydrates, and crystalline forms thereof, where the acetate salts of buprenorphine are essentially free of impurities. The disclosure further provides method of preparing the acetate salts, buprenorphine free base prepared from the acetate salts, other salts prepared from the free base, and pharmaceutical compositions thereof essentially free of impurities.

Claims (39)

1. A crystalline form of the acetate salt of buprenorphine comprising a hydrate, wherein the hydrate is a tetrahydrate.

2. The crystalline form of claim 1 , characterized by an X-ray powder diffraction pattern obtained by exposure to CuKα radiation comprising peaks at 2θ angles substantially equivalent to 16.21 and 18.70, and having at least one additional peak at a 2θ angle substantially equivalent to 8.77, 10.31, or 18.47.

3. The crystalline form of claim 1 , characterized by an X-ray powder diffraction pattern obtained by exposure to CuKα radiation comprising peaks at 2θ angles substantially equivalent to 8.77, 10.31, 16.21, and 18.70, and having at least one additional peak at a 2θ angle substantially equivalent to 6.38, 11.93, or 19.40.

4. The crystalline form of claim 1 , characterized by an X-ray powder diffraction pattern obtained by exposure to CuKα radiation comprising peaks at 2θ angles substantially equivalent to 8.77, 10.31, 16.21, 18.47, and 18.70, and having at least one additional peak at a 2θ angle substantially equivalent to 6.38, 11.93, or 19.40.

5. The crystalline form of claim 1 , characterized by an X-ray powder diffraction pattern obtained by exposure to CuKα radiation comprising peaks at diffraction angles substantially equivalent to at least those in the following table:

Position [°2Theta]

6.38

8.77

10.31

11.93

16.21

18.70

19.40.

6. The crystalline form of claim 1 , characterized by an X-ray powder diffraction pattern obtained by exposure to CuKα radiation comprising peaks at diffraction angles substantially equivalent to at least those in the following table

Position [°2Theta]

6.38

8.77

10.31

11.93

16.21

18.47

18.70

19.40.

7. The crystalline form of claim 1 , which has an X-ray powder diffraction pattern substantially the same as the X-ray powder diffraction pattern shown in FIG. 4 when measuring using CuKα radiation.

8. The crystalline form of claim 1 , wherein the crystalline form exhibits a first transition region with at least one peak position at from about 50° C. to about 140° C. as measured by a heat flow differential scanning calorimeter at a heating rate of about 10° C. per minute.

9. The crystalline form of claim 8 , wherein the crystalline form exhibits a second transition region having a peak position at from about 217° C. to about 225° C. as measured by a heat flow differential scanning calorimeter at a heating rate of about 10° C. per minute.

10. The crystalline form of claim 9 , which exhibits an integral ratio of from about 7 to about 8 for the first transition region at from about 50° C. to about 140° C. relative to the second transition region at from about 217° C. to about 225° C., wherein the integrals are determined over the temperature ranges of from about 35° C. to about 180° C. and from about 203° C. to about 233° C., respectively.

11. The crystalline form of claim 10 , wherein the crystalline form exhibits an integral ratio of from about 7.1 to about 7.8.

12. The crystalline form of claim 3 , characterized in that it is a monoclinic crystal.

13. The crystalline form of claim 5 , characterized in that it is a monoclinic crystal.

14. The crystalline form of claim 9 , characterized in that it is a monoclinic crystal.

15. The crystalline form of claim 12 , wherein the unit cell parameters are a=10.5±0.5 Å, b=10.9±0.5 Å, and c=14.4±0.5 Å.

16. The crystalline form of claim 15 , wherein the unit cell parameters are a=10.52±0.05 Å, b=10.92±0.05 Å, and c=14.44±0.05 Å.

17. The crystalline form of claim 12 , wherein the space group is P2 1 .

18. The crystalline form of claim 13 , wherein the space group is P2 1 .

19. The crystalline form of claim 14 , wherein the space group is P2 1 .

20. A pharmaceutical composition comprising the crystalline form of claim 1 , and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.

21. A method for treating pain comprising administering to an animal in need thereof an effective amount of the crystalline form of claim 1 .

22. A method for treating pain comprising administering to an animal in need thereof an effective amount of the pharmaceutical composition of claim 20 .

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 17, 2021
From: RHODES TECHNOLOGIES
To: NORAMCO, LLC
Reel/Frame 055627/0662 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 8, 2019
From: HUNTLEY, C. FREDERICK M.; KATAISTO, ERIK WAYNE; REISCH, HELGE ALFRED; SHARMA, ARCHANA
To: RHODES TECHNOLOGIES
Reel/Frame 047936/0164 →
Continuity (4)
Division 15446197 · Mar 1, 2017
Continuation 15507453
Provisional Application 62131114 · Mar 10, 2015
Related Publication 20180162866A1 · Jun 14, 2018