IP Library › Granted Patent US 10,299,140
Granted Patent B2
US 10,299,140 · App. 15/223,580 · Granted May 21, 2019

Change roll out in wireless networks

Inventors: Ajay Mahimkar (Woodbridge, NJ); Zihui Ge (Madison, NJ); Nabeel Mir (Edmond, OK); Sarat Puthenpura (Berkeley Heights, NJ); Lili Qiu (Austin, TX); Mubashir Adnan Qureshi (Austin, TX)
Assignees: AT&T Intellectual Property I, L.P.; AT&T Mobility II LLC; Board Of Regents, The University of Texas System
H04W16/18H04L41/082H04L41/0816H04L41/147H04L43/08H04L43/50
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,299,140
App. No.
15/223,580
Granted
May 21, 2019
Kind
B2
Abstract

An approach for change roll out in wireless networks that utilizes a diverse set of features, such as software/hardware configuration, radio parameters, user population, mobility patterns, network topology and automatically identifies the test locations that would improve the predictability between the performance impacts during testing and network-wide deployment. Through automated and effective analysis of a wide variety of features, the approach for change roll out in wireless networks reflects the impacts observed during testing and predicts the performance of the post-test wide-scale deployment.

Claims (41)

1. A server comprising:

a processor; and

a memory coupled with the processor, the memory comprising executable instructions that when executed by the processor cause the processor to effectuate operations comprising:

generating a first list of a plurality of features based on a hamming distance, the first list of the plurality of features associated with a communications network;

determining a first plurality of test locations based on the first list of the plurality of features, the test locations comprising a plurality of upgradable devices;

providing instructions to upgrade the first plurality of test locations;

responsive to the upgrade, assessing performance of the first plurality of test locations; and

based on the performance of the first plurality of test locations, determining a second list of the plurality of features, the second list a subset of the first list.

2. The server of claim 1 , wherein the generating the first list of the plurality of features further comprises: determining a second subset list of the first list based on a first maximum minimum hamming distance over the first subset list.

3. The server of claim 2 , wherein the first list comprises a third subset list of the first list, wherein the third subset list is based on a second maximum minimum hamming distance from the first subset list and the second subset list.

4. The server of claim 1 , wherein the hamming distance is weighed based on a threshold number of test locations with a feature in the first list.

5. The server of claim 1 , wherein the first list comprises a cell search associated feature.

6. The server of claim 1 , wherein the first list comprises an uplink noise associated feature or physical resource block utilization associated feature.

7. The server of claim 1 , wherein the generating the first list of the plurality of features further comprises: discretizing to numerical values a first subset list of the first list.

8. The server of claim 1 , wherein the generating the first list of the plurality of features further comprises: reducing a number of features based clustering features into equivalence classes.

9. The server of claim 1 , wherein the upgrade comprises a change of software or hardware in the plurality of test locations.

10. The server of claim 1 , further operations comprising determining a second plurality of test locations based on the second list of the plurality of features.

11. A computer readable storage medium comprising computer executable instructions that when executed by a computing device cause said computing device to effectuate operations comprising:

generating a first list of a plurality of features based on a hamming distance, the first list of the plurality of features associated with a communications network;

determining a first plurality of test locations based on the first list of the plurality of features, the test locations comprising a plurality of upgradable devices;

providing instructions to upgrade the first plurality of test locations;

responsive to the upgrade, assessing performance of the first plurality of test locations; and

based on the performance of the first plurality of test locations, determining a second list of the plurality of features, the second list a subset of the first list.

12. The computer readable storage medium of claim 11 , wherein the generating the first list of the plurality of features further comprises: determining a second subset list of the first list based on a first maximum minimum hamming distance over the first subset list.

13. The computer readable storage medium of claim 12 , wherein the first list comprises a third subset list of the first list, wherein the third subset list is based on a second maximum minimum hamming distance from the first subset list and the second subset list.

14. The computer readable storage medium of claim 11 , wherein the hamming distance is weighed based on a threshold number of test locations with a feature in the first list.

15. The computer readable storage medium of claim 11 , wherein the first list comprises a power control associated feature.

16. A method comprising:

generating, by a server, a first list of a plurality of features based on a hamming distance, the first list of the plurality of features associated with a communications network;

determining a first plurality of test locations based on the first list of the plurality of features, the test locations comprising a plurality of upgradable devices;

providing instructions to upgrade the first plurality of test locations;

responsive to the upgrade, assessing performance of the first plurality of test locations;

based on the performance of the first plurality of test locations, determining a second list of the plurality of features, the second list a subset of the first list;

determining a second plurality of test locations based on the second list of the plurality of features;

providing instructions to upgrade the second plurality of test locations;

responsive to the upgrade, assessing performance of the second plurality of test locations; and

based on assessing performance of the second plurality of test locations, providing a feature of the second list that is the root cause of a degradation of service of the communications network.

17. The method of claim 16 , wherein the generating the first list of the plurality of features further comprises: determining a second subset list of the first list based on a first maximum minimum hamming distance over the first subset list.

18. The method of claim 17 , wherein the first list comprises a third subset list of the first list, wherein the third subset list is based on a second maximum minimum hamming distance from the first subset list and the second subset list.

19. The method of claim 16 , wherein the hamming distance is weighed based on a threshold number of test locations with a feature in the first list.

20. The method of claim 16 , wherein the first list comprises a medium access layer associated feature.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 26, 2017
From: MIR, NABEEL
To: AT&T MOBILITY II LLC
Reel/Frame 044296/0074 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 26, 2017
From: QIU, LILI; QURESHI, MUBASHIR ADNAN
To: BOARD OF REGENTS, THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM
Reel/Frame 044296/0084 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 26, 2017
From: PUTHENPURA, SARAT; GE, ZIHUI; MAHIMKAR, AJAY
To: AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I, L.P.
Reel/Frame 043953/0218 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20180035307A1 · Feb 1, 2018