IP Library › Granted Patent US 10,319,048
Granted Patent B2
US 10,319,048 · App. 14/837,770 · Granted Jun 11, 2019

Calculating expertise confidence based on content and social proximity

Inventors: Leonid Bolshinsky (Karmiel, IL); Inbal Ronen (Haifa, IL); Eitan Shapiro (Haifa, IL); Arnon Yogev (Misgav, IL)
Assignee: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
G06Q50/01G06F16/33G06F16/951
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,319,048
App. No.
14/837,770
Filed
Aug 27, 2015
Granted
Jun 11, 2019
Kind
B2
Examiner
HOANG, SON T
Art Unit
2169
USPC
707/748
Abstract

A method includes executing, via a processor, a document-oriented search based on a query in an index of documents to generate a set of document results, each document associated with at least one potential expert. The method includes analyzing the document results to produce a list of potential experts. The method includes calculating an expertise score for each potential expert based on a calculated content score and metadata score for each potential expert. The method includes calculating an evidence diversity score for each potential expert. The method includes calculating a confidence score for each potential expert based on a diversity-constrained content score and a diversity-constrained metadata score for each potential expert. The method includes displaying a list of potential experts with associated confidence scores.

Claims (21)

1. A method, comprising:

executing, via a processor, a document-oriented search based on a query in an index of documents to generate a set of document results, each document in the set of document results is associated with at least one potential expert;

analyzing, via the processor, the document results to produce a list of potential experts;

calculating, via the processor, an expertise score for each potential expert based on a calculated content score and metadata score for each potential expert;

calculating, via the processor, an evidence diversity score for each potential expert;

calculating, via the processor, a confidence score for each potential expert based on a diversity-constrained content score and a diversity-constrained metadata score for each potential expert, wherein:

the diversity-constrained content score is calculated using the evidence diversity score, comprising a predetermined threshold number of different activities associated with the potential expert, and the content score for the potential expert;

the diversity-constrained metadata score is calculated using the evidence diversity score and the metadata score for the potential expert;

the content score is calculated based on a number of different content document types and associations associated with the potential expert, the content document types and associations are gathered by parsing websites and stored in a data repository;

the metadata score is calculated based on profile-related information associated with the potential expert; and

the confidence score is further calculated based on a social score, wherein the processor is configured to generate a representation of connections between the potential experts, the social score for each potential expert is calculated using the representation of connections and based on a number of connections to other potential experts; and

sending a list of potential experts whose confidence scores are above a confidence score threshold to a client device.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

selecting, via the processor, a predetermined number of potential experts whose expertise scores meeting a threshold expertise score from the list of potential experts;

calculating, via the processor, the evidence diversity score for each selected expert; and

calculating, via the processor, a confidence score for each selected expert using the evidence diversity score for each selected expert.

3. The method of claim 2 , further comprising sorting the list of potential experts by the expertise scores, wherein the predetermined number of selected experts being selected from the sorted list of potential experts.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising calculating the diversity-constrained content score comprising constraining the content score based on the evidence diversity score and calculating the diversity-constrained metadata score comprising constraining the metadata score based on the evidence diversity score.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the confidence scores are calculated based on preconfigured thresholds.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the query indicates an expertise, and the confidence score is used to indicate a level of certainty in the expertise for each potential expert.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the list of potential experts is filtered according to the confidence scores and sorted by the expertise scores.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 27, 2015
From: BOLSHINSKY, LEONID; RONEN, INBAL; SHAPIRO, EITAN; YOGEV, ARNON
To: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 036441/0210 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation 14573561 · Dec 17, 2014
Related Publication 20160179810A1 · Jun 23, 2016