IP Library › Granted Patent US 10,380,281
Granted Patent B2
US 10,380,281 · App. 15/359,397 · Granted Aug 13, 2019

Vector-ratio safety factors for wellbore tubular design

Inventors: Zhengchun Liu (Sugar Land, TX); Robello Samuel (Cypress, TX); Adolfo Gonzales (Houston, TX); Yongfeng Kang (Katy, TX)
Assignee: LANDMARK GRAPHICS CORPORATION
G06F17/5009E21C41/00E21B47/06
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,380,281
App. No.
15/359,397
Granted
Aug 13, 2019
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and methods for determining vector-ratio safety factors for wellbore tubular design are provided. Pressure and temperature data for at least one load point along a tubular component of a wellbore are obtained. An effective failure axial load expected at the load point is calculated during a downhole operation to be performed along one or more sections of the wellbore within a subsurface formation, based on the obtained data. An upper boundary and a lower boundary for the effective failure axial load are determined, based on physical properties of the tubular component at the load point. A midpoint of the effective failure axial load is calculated based on the upper and lower boundaries. A critical failure differential pressure is calculated, based on the midpoint of the effective failure axial load. A vector-ratio safety factor is calculated, based on the critical failure differential pressure relative to the effective failure axial load.

Claims (57)

1. A computer-implemented method of determining vector-ratio safety factors for wellbore tubular design, the method comprising:

obtaining pressure and temperature data for at least one load point along a tubular component of a wellbore;

calculating an effective failure axial load expected at the load point during a downhole operation to be performed along one or more sections of the wellbore within a subsurface formation, based on the obtained pressure and temperature data;

determining an upper boundary and a lower boundary for the effective failure axial load, based on physical properties of the tubular component at the load point;

calculating a midpoint of the effective failure axial load based on the upper and lower boundaries;

calculating a critical failure differential pressure corresponding to a collapse resistance of the tubular component, based on the midpoint of the effective failure axial load;

calculating a vector-ratio safety factor for the tubular component, based on the critical failure differential pressure relative to the effective failure axial load;

selecting one of a plurality of designs for the tubular component based on the vector-ratio safety factor; and

performing the downhole operation using the selected design of the tubular component along the one or more sections of the wellbore.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining whether or not the vector-ratio safety factor is within an error tolerance threshold; and

when the vector-ratio safety factor is determined not to be within the error tolerance threshold:

adjusting at least one of the upper boundary or the lower boundary of the effective failure axial load; and

recalculating the midpoint of the effective failure axial load, the critical differential pressure, and the vector-ratio safety factor, based on the adjusting,

wherein the adjusting and the recalculating are repeated until the vector-ratio safety factor is determined to be within the error tolerance threshold.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein calculating the effective failure axial load comprises:

estimating an axial force and a differential pressure at the load point, based on the corresponding pressure and temperature data; and

calculating the effective failure axial load at the load point based on the estimated axial force and the differential pressure.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the pressure and temperature data are obtained from a thermal flow simulation for the load point along the tubular component of the wellbore.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the tubular component of the wellbore corresponds to a portion of a tubing string or a portion of a casing string along the one or more sections of the wellbore.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the critical failure differential pressure is a critical collapse resistance along a radial load trajectory of the tubular component of the wellbore.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the critical failure differential pressure is calculated based on an industry standard formula.

8. The method of claim 6 , wherein the critical failure differential pressure is calculated based on an interpolation from a plurality of user-specified data points of failure differential pressure and the effective failure axial load at the load point along the wellbore.

9. A system for determining vector-ratio safety factors for wellbore tubular design, the system comprising:

at least one processor; and

a memory coupled to the processor having instructions stored therein, which when executed by the processor, cause the processor to perform functions including functions to:

obtain pressure and temperature data for at least one load point along a tubular component of a wellbore;

calculate an effective failure axial load expected at the load point during a downhole operation to be performed along one or more sections of the wellbore within a subsurface formation, based on the obtained pressure and temperature data;

determine an upper boundary and a lower boundary for the effective failure axial load, based on physical properties of the tubular component at the load point;

calculate a midpoint of the effective failure axial load based on the upper and lower boundaries;

calculate a critical failure differential pressure corresponding to a collapse resistance of the tubular component, based on the midpoint of the effective failure axial load;

calculate a vector-ratio safety factor for the tubular component, based on the critical failure differential pressure relative to the effective failure axial load;

select one of a plurality of designs for the tubular component based on the vector-ratio safety factor; and

perform the downhole operation using the selected design of the tubular component along the one or more sections of the wellbore.

10. The system of claim 9 , wherein the functions performed by the processor further include functions to:

determine whether or not the vector-ratio safety factor is within an error tolerance threshold; and

when the vector-ratio safety factor is determined not to be within the error tolerance threshold:

adjust at least one of the upper boundary or the lower boundary of the effective failure axial load; and

recalculate the midpoint of the effective failure axial load, the critical differential pressure, and the vector-ratio safety factor, based on the adjustment to at least one of the upper boundary or the lower boundary of the effective failure axial load,

wherein the adjustment and the recalculation are repeated until the vector-ratio safety factor is determined to be within the error tolerance threshold.

11. The system of claim 9 , wherein the functions performed by the processor further include functions to:

estimate an axial force and a differential pressure at the load point, based on the corresponding pressure and temperature data; and

calculate the effective failure axial load at the load point based on the estimated axial force and the differential pressure.

12. The system of claim 9 , wherein the pressure and temperature data are obtained from a thermal flow simulation for the load point along the tubular component of the wellbore.

13. The system of claim 9 , wherein the tubular component of the wellbore corresponds to a portion of a tubing string or a portion of a casing string along the one or more sections of the wellbore.

14. The system of claim 9 , wherein the critical failure differential pressure is a critical collapse resistance along a radial load trajectory of the tubular component of the wellbore.

15. The system of claim 14 , wherein the critical failure differential pressure is calculated based on an industry standard formula.

16. The system of claim 14 , wherein the critical failure differential pressure is calculated based on an interpolation from a plurality of user-specified data points of failure differential pressure and the effective failure axial load at the load point along the wellbore.

17. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium having instructions stored therein, which when executed by a computer cause the computer to perform a plurality of functions, including functions to:

obtain pressure and temperature data for at least one load point along a tubular component of a wellbore;

calculate an effective failure axial load expected at the load point during a downhole operation to be performed along one or more sections of the wellbore within a subsurface formation, based on the obtained pressure and temperature data;

determine an upper boundary and a lower boundary for the effective failure axial load, based on physical properties of the tubular component at the load point;

calculate a midpoint of the effective failure axial load based on the upper and lower boundaries;

calculate a critical failure differential pressure corresponding to a collapse resistance of the tubular component, based on the midpoint of the effective failure axial load;

calculate a vector-ratio safety factor for the tubular component, based on the critical failure differential pressure relative to the effective failure axial load;

select one of a plurality of designs for the tubular component based on the vector-ratio safety factor; and

perform the downhole operation using the selected design of the tubular component along the one or more sections of the wellbore.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 7, 2016
From: LIU, ZHENGCHUN; SAMUEL, ROBELLO; GONZALES, ADOLFO; KANG, YONGFENG
To: LANDMARK GRAPHICS CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 040593/0091 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20180142536A1 · May 24, 2018