IP Library Granted Patent US 10,404,976
Granted Patent B2
US 10,404,976 · App. 14/364,336 · Granted Sep 3, 2019

Intra-operative quality monitoring of tracking systems

Inventors: Ameet Kumar Jain (New York, NY); Vijay Parthasarathy (Tarrytown, NY)
Assignee: KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V.
H04N17/002A61B5/06A61B6/4417A61B8/4254A61B8/4416A61B34/20G06T7/80A61B5/062A61B2017/00725A61B2090/0818A61B2090/364G06T2207/30004
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,404,976
App. No.
14/364,336
Granted
Sep 3, 2019
Kind
B2
Abstract

An interventional system employing an interventional tool ( 20 ) having a tracking point, and an imaging system ( 30 ) operable for generating at least one image of at least a portion of the interventional tool ( 20 ) relative to an anatomical region of a body. The system further employs a tracking system ( 40 ) operable for tracking any movements of the interventional tool ( 20 ) and the imaging system ( 30 ) within a spatial reference frame relative to the anatomical region of the body, wherein the tracking system ( 40 ) is calibrated to the interventional tool ( 20 ) and the imaging system ( 30 ) and a tracking quality monitor ( 52 ) operable for monitoring a tracking quality of the tracking system ( 40 ) as a function of a calibrated location error for each image between a calibrated tracking location of the tracking point within the spatial reference frame and an image coordinate location of the tracking point in the image.

Claims (22)

1. An interventional system, comprising:

an interventional tool having a tracking point;

an imaging system operable for generating at least one image of at least a portion of the interventional tool relative to an anatomical region of a body;

a tracking system operable for tracking any movements of the interventional tool and the imaging system within a spatial reference frame relative to the anatomical region of the body, wherein the tracking system is calibrated to the interventional tool and the imaging system; and

an interventional workstation in communication with the imaging system and the tracking system,

wherein the interventional workstation includes a tracking quality monitor operable for monitoring a tracking quality of the tracking system as a function of a calibrated location error for each image between a calibrated tracking location of the tracking point within the spatial reference frame and an image coordinate location of the tracking point in the image.

2. The interventional system of claim 1 , wherein each calibration location error is a spatial differential in one or more dimensions of the spatial reference frame between the calibrated tracking location of the tracking point within the spatial reference frame and the image coordinate location of the tracking point in the image.

3. The interventional system of claim 1 , wherein the tracking quality monitor is further operable for generating a distribution map of calibration location errors within the spatial reference frame relative to the anatomical region of the body.

4. The interventional system of claim 1 , wherein the tracking quality monitor is further operable for providing an alert responsive to at least one calibration location error exceeding a calibrated error threshold.

5. The interventional system of claim 1 , wherein the tracking quality monitor is further operable for correcting the calibration of the tracking system to the interventional tool and the imaging system responsive to at least one calibration location error exceeding a calibrated error threshold.

6. The interventional system of claim 1 , wherein the interventional tool is an ultrasound probe and the tracking point is a head of the ultrasound probe.

7. The interventional system of claim 1 , wherein the interventional tool is a catheter and the tracking point is a tip of the catheter.

8. The interventional system of claim 1 , wherein the imaging system is an ultrasound imaging system.

9. The interventional system of claim 1 , wherein the imaging system is an X-ray imaging system.

10. The interventional system of claim 1 , wherein the tracking system is an electromagnetic tracking system.

11. The interventional system of claim 1 , wherein the imaging system is an optical tracking system.

12. An interventional workstation, comprising:

an intervention navigator operable for visualizing positions of an interventional tool within a spatial reference frame relative to at least one registered image of an anatomical region of a body during an interventional procedure; and

a tracking quality monitor operable for monitoring a tracking quality of the at least one registered image as a function of a calibrated location error for each registered image between a calibrated tracking location of the tracking point within the spatial reference frame and an image coordinate location of the tracking point in the registered image.

13. The interventional workstation of claim 12 , wherein each calibration location error is a spatial differential in one or more dimensions of the spatial reference frame between the calibrated tracking location of the tracking point within the spatial reference frame and the image coordinate location of the tracking point in the image.

14. The interventional workstation of claim 12 , wherein the tracking quality monitor is further operable for generating a distribution map of calibration location errors within the spatial reference frame relative to the anatomical region of the body.

15. The interventional workstation of claim 12 , wherein the tracking quality monitor is further operable for at least one of providing an alert responsive to at least one calibration location error exceeding a calibrated error threshold and correcting the calibration of the tracking system to the interventional tool and the imaging system responsive to at least one calibration location error exceeding a calibrated error threshold.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 11, 2014
From: JAIN, AMEET KUMAR; PARTHASARATHY, VIJAY
To: KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V.
Reel/Frame 033073/0726 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 61580519 · Dec 27, 2011
Related Publication 20140375822A1 · Dec 25, 2014