IP Library › Granted Patent US 10,447,334
Granted Patent B2
US 10,447,334 · App. 16/019,503 · Granted Oct 15, 2019

Methods and systems for comprehensive security-lockdown

Inventors: Arun Kumar Sharma (Cupertino, CA); Michael Wurm (Redwood City, CA); Richard Schaffzin (Mountain View, CA); Prajakta Setty (Fremont, CA); Deep Kumar (Fremont, CA)
Assignee: SecureALL Corporation
H04B1/401H04B1/16H04B5/0062H04W52/02H04W52/0229H04W52/0235Y02D70/00Y02D70/22
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,447,334
App. No.
16/019,503
Granted
Oct 15, 2019
Kind
B2
Abstract

An electronic lock can enter a lockdown mode in response to a lockdown command comprising a mechanical command, e.g. a button or door handle being pressed on the lock in a predefined time-series sequence, or touching the lock in a time-series sequence). Alternatively, an audio or visual command can be issued, e.g. saying certain words or making a hand gesture. The lock may require additional authentication before executing the lockdown command, e.g. recognizing an authorized electronic key. Other embodiments are also provided.

Claims (27)

1. An electronic door lock (EDL) comprising an interface for receiving a first command to switch from a first mode to a second mode, the first command being a Lockdown command issued in response to one or more user Lockdown requests initiated by one or more users, wherein: in the first mode, the EDL is locked but grants access to a first set of electronic keys; and in the second mode, the EDL is locked but grants access to a smaller set of electronic keys (Ekeys) than in the first mode; wherein the EDL is configured to notify a server over a network of a change from the first mode to the second mode.

2. The EDL of claim 1 wherein the EDL is configured to execute the first command only if the EDL recognizes an Ekey authorized to place the EDL into the second mode.

3. The EDL of claim 2 wherein the EDL is also operable to receive and execute a second command to leave the second mode, wherein the EDL is configured to execute the second command only if the EDL recognizes an Ekey authorized to cause the EDL to leave the second mode, wherein a set of Ekeys authorized to place the EDL into the second mode is different from a set of Ekeys authorized to cause the EDL to leave the second mode.

4. The EDL of claim 3 wherein the set of Ekeys authorized to cause the EDL to leave the second mode is identical to a set of Ekeys authorized to unlock the EDL in a mode other than the second mode.

5. The EDL of claim 2 wherein the EDL is configured to execute the first command only within a predefined period of time after the EDL recognizes an Ekey authorized to place the EDL into the second mode.

6. The EDL of claim 2 wherein the EDL is configured to execute the first command only if the EDL recognizes an Ekey located either on a first side of the EDL or on a second side of the EDL, wherein the EDL is suitable for controlling access through a door of a room, the first side being at the room's interior, the second side being at the room's exterior.

7. A system comprising the EDL of claim 1 and a video camera which, in operation, in response to the EDL notifying the server, is steered to record an area comprising the EDL and to send a network communication indicating availability of the video.

8. The system of claim 7 wherein the video camera is steered remotely by the server in response to the EDL notifying the server.

9. The EDL of claim 1 wherein each said Lockdown request is initiated by a user using an action button.

10. An electronic door lock (EDL) comprising a plurality of modes of operation, each mode being associated with a set of electronic keys (Ekeys) operable to unlock the EDL, wherein different modes are associated with respective different sets of Ekeys;

wherein said modes comprise a plurality of Lockdown modes and, in addition, a Normal mode;

wherein for every two of said modes, one of the modes is associated with the larger set of Ekeys and the other one of the modes, the Normal mode being associated with the largest set of Ekeys.

11. The EDL of claim 10 further comprising an Open mode in which the EDL is always open.

12. The EDL of claim 10 wherein the EDL is operable to enter any one of the Lockdown modes in response to a network communication, and to send a network communication indicating entry into the corresponding Lockdown mode;

wherein upon receipt of a Lockdown Test network communication, the EDL is operable to send the network communication indicating entry into the corresponding Lockdown mode without the EDL entering into the corresponding Lockdown mode.

13. A system comprising an apparatus for controlling a plurality of electronic door locks (EDLs), the apparatus being operable to receive action button (AB) Lockdown signal messages from ABs, to determine from the AB Lockdown signal messages whether one or more conditions have occurred that correspond to a set of EDLs, and to send a Lockdown message to each EDL of the set to cause the EDL to enter a Lockdown mode;

wherein the set of EDLs is determined based on temporal proximity of the AB Lockdown signal messages, and/or spatial proximity of physical locations of the ABs that generated the Lockdown signal messages.

14. The system of claim 13 wherein the set of EDLs consists of all the EDLs in a building containing at least one AB whose AB Lockdown signal message is received.

15. The system of claim 13 wherein the one or more conditions are determined by an automatic computation using machine learning.

16. The system of claim 13 wherein the one or more conditions are determined using a function of:

time information;

Set of EDLs each of which comprises an AB that sent an AB Lockdown signal message, and

Spatial density of EDLs each of which comprises an AB that sent an AB Lockdown signal message.

17. The system of claim 16 wherein either progressively increasing or progressively decreasing function values result in corresponding progressive increase of the set of the EDLs.

18. The system of claim 16 wherein said function also depends on an importance parameter of each AB whose AB Lockdown signal message has been received within a time defined by the time information.

19. The system of claim 16 wherein the function value is determined using a Center of Activation function pressure.

20. The system of claim 16 wherein the function value is determined using a modified weighted Center of Activation function pressure.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 17, 2019
From: KUMAR, DEEP
To: SECUREALL CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 049494/0201 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 27, 2018
From: SETTY, PRAJAKTA
To: SECUREALL CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 046445/0372 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 26, 2018
From: SHARMA, ARUN KUMAR; WURM, MICHAEL; SCHAFFZIN, RICHARD
To: SECUREALL CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 046438/0773 →
Continuity (16)
Continuation In Part 15473224 · Mar 29, 2017
Continuation In Part 14444949 · Jul 28, 2014
Continuation In Part 13747362 · Jan 22, 2013
Continuation 12500587 · Jul 9, 2009
Continuation In Part 13340520 · Dec 29, 2011
Continuation In Part 13691626 · Nov 30, 2012
Continuation In Part 13843757 · Mar 15, 2013
Continuation In Part 13841079 · Mar 15, 2013
Provisional Application 62524907 · Jun 26, 2017
Provisional Application 61858821 · Jul 26, 2013
Provisional Application 61611575 · Mar 16, 2012
Provisional Application 61611577 · Mar 16, 2012
Provisional Application 61565450 · Nov 30, 2011
Provisional Application 61428155 · Dec 29, 2010
Provisional Application 61079435 · Jul 9, 2008
Related Publication 20180316381A1 · Nov 1, 2018