Detecting defects in non-nested tubings and casings using calibrated data and time thresholds
A method of detecting defects in non-nested tubings or a casing includes acquiring a first set of data from an electromagnetic (“EM”) tool run inside a first of the non-nested tubings. The method further includes calibrating the data to reduce effects from a second of the non-nested tubings, identifying a location of a defect in the first of the non-nested tubings or the casing, and adjusting the data to compensate for eccentricity if the defect is in the casing. The method further includes performing an inversion algorithm on the data, the inversion algorithm developed for a single tubing configuration.
1. A method of detecting defects in non-nested tubings or a casing comprising:
acquiring, at a processor, a first set of data from an electromagnetic (“EM”) tool run inside a first of the non-nested tubings;
acquiring, at the processor, a second set of data from the EM tool run inside a second of the non-nested tubings;
calibrating, by the processor, the first set of data to reduce effects from the second of the non-nested tubings by aligning the second set of data with the first set of data;
identifying, by the processor, a location of a defect in the first of the non-nested tubings, the second of the non-nested tubings, or the casing;
adjusting, by the processor, the first set of data to compensate for eccentricity if the defect is located in the casing;
performing, by the processor, an inversion algorithm on the first set of data and the second set of data, the inversion algorithm developed for a single tubing configuration; and
displaying, using an output device, the location of the defect.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein aligning the second set of data with the first set of data comprises using collar responses as alignment markers.
3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first set of data comprises a first decay response, the second set of data comprises a second decay response, and adjusting the data comprises matching the first decay response with second decay response.
4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first set of data comprises a first decay response, wherein the second set of data comprises a second decay response, and wherein adjusting the data comprises matching a portion of the first decay response after a time threshold with a portion of the second decay response after the time threshold if the first of the non-nested tubings has a different outer diameter than the second of the non-nested tubings.
5. The method of claim 4 , wherein identifying the location of the defect comprises comparing the first decay response with the second decay response before and after the time threshold.
6. A method of detecting defects in non-nested tubings or a casing comprising:
conveying an electromagnetic tool through a first of the non-nested tubings to acquire a first set of data;
conveying the electromagnetic tool through a second of the non-nested tubings to acquire a second set of data;
calibrating, by a processor, the first set of data to reduce effects from the second of the non-nested tubings by aligning the second set of data with the first set of data;
identifying, by the processor, a location of a defect in the first of the non-nested tubings, the second of the non-nested tubings, or the casing;
adjusting, by the processor, the first set of data to compensate for eccentricity if the defect is located in the casing;
performing, by the processor, an inversion algorithm on the first set of data and the second set of data, the inversion algorithm developed for a single tubing configuration; and
displaying, using an output device, the location of the defect.
7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the first set of data comprises a first decay response, the second set of data comprises a second decay response, and adjusting the data comprises matching the first decay response with second decay response.
8. The method of claim 7 , wherein identifying the location of the defect comprises comparing the first decay response with the second decay response before and after a time threshold.
9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the time threshold is determined based on outer diameters, thicknesses, and magnetic permeabilities of the non-nested tubings and the casing.
10. The method of claim 8 , wherein the time threshold is determined based on historical data.
11. The method of claim 8 , wherein the time threshold is determined based on simulating the non-nested tubings and casing without defects.
12. The method of claim 8 , wherein identifying the location of the defect further comprises identifying that the defect is located on the first of the non-nested tubings based on a larger change in amplitude of the first decay response before the time threshold compared to a smaller change in amplitude of the second decay response after the time threshold.
13. The method of claim 8 , wherein identifying the location of the defect further comprises identifying that the defect is located on the second of the non-nested tubings based on a smaller change in amplitude of the first decay response after the time threshold compared to a larger change in amplitude of the second decay response before the time threshold.
14. The method of claim 8 wherein identifying the location of the defect further comprises identifying that the defect is located on the casing based on a larger change in amplitude of the first decay response after the time threshold compared to a smaller change in amplitude of the first decay response before the time threshold as well as a larger change in amplitude of the second decay response after the time threshold compared to a smaller change in amplitude of the second decay response before the time threshold.