IP Library › Granted Patent US 10,502,761
Granted Patent B2
US 10,502,761 · App. 15/449,584 · Granted Dec 10, 2019

Method and apparatus of operating a scanning probe microscope

Inventors: Yan Hu (Ventura, CA); Shuiqing Hu (Santa Barbara, CA); Chanmin Su (Ventura, CA)
Assignee: Bruker Nano, Inc.
G01Q20/00B82Y35/00G01Q10/065G01Q20/02G01Q60/24G01Q60/30G01Q60/32G01Q60/34
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,502,761
App. No.
15/449,584
Granted
Dec 10, 2019
Kind
B2
Abstract

An improved mode of AFM imaging (Peak Force Tapping (PFT) Mode) uses force as the feedback variable to reduce tip-sample interaction forces while maintaining scan speeds achievable by all existing AFM operating modes. Sample imaging and mechanical property mapping are achieved with improved resolution and high sample throughput, with the mode workable across varying environments, including gaseous, fluidic and vacuum.

Claims (14)

1. A method of operating a scanning probe microscope (SPM) comprising:

interacting a tip of a probe of the SPM with a sample; then

terminating the interaction, resulting in a decaying probe oscillation;

repeating the interaction before ringdown of the decaying probe oscillation is substantially complete; and

detecting motion of the probe during the interaction step;

determining an instantaneous force on the tip based on the detecting step;

using the instantaneous force as a feedback control parameter to operate the SPM; and

further comprising determining a synchronization distance and using the synchronization distance to determine the instantaneous force.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the synchronization distance is determined using one of A) measuring the phase delay between the detected motion and a drive signal of the oscillating step, and B) measuring a distance between initiating a period of the drive signal and an instant of interaction between the probe and the sample.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the synchronization distance is determined using a window.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining step includes subtracting that portion of the detected motion caused by parasitic forces from the detected motion.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein a minimum controllable force upon performing the subtraction step is at least about an order of magnitude less than a minimum controllable force without perforating the subtraction step.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein the minimum controllable force is about 1 pN when the cantilever has a length equal to about 100 microns and a spring constant of about 0.01 N/m.

7. The method of claim 4 , wherein the parasitic forces are caused by a hydrodynamic background.

Continuity (5)
Continuation 15137937 · Apr 25, 2016
Continuation 14288180 · May 27, 2014
Continuation 12618641 · Nov 13, 2009
Provisional Application 61114399 · Nov 13, 2008
Related Publication 20170242052A1 · Aug 24, 2017
Cited By (1)
US 12,253,539