IP Library › Granted Patent US 10,569,875
Granted Patent B2
US 10,569,875 · App. 15/812,448 · Granted Feb 25, 2020

Using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs or drones) in forestry imaging and assessment applications

Inventors: Matthew J. Flood (Dubuque, IA); Mark J. Cherney (Dubuque, IA); Andrew W. Kahler (Moline, IL); Richard Lawler (Dubuque, IA)
Assignee: Deere & Company
B64C39/024A01G23/00B64D47/08G01C9/005G01C21/04G05D1/0022G05D1/0088G06K9/00657G08G5/0034B64C2201/123B64C2201/127B64C2201/146
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,569,875
App. No.
15/812,448
Granted
Feb 25, 2020
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method includes controlling an unmanned aerial vehicle to fly over a forestry worksite and capture imagery information with an image capture component. The imagery information is used to generate a set of ground disturbance metrics, each having a value indicative of a measure of ground disturbance at a different geographic location in the forestry worksite. Alternatively, the imagery information is used to generate a set of slope metrics or a firefighting metric. According to the ground disturbance, slope, and firefighting metrics, the method is used to generate an action signal, such as an action signal that controls movement of a mobile machine operating at the forestry worksite, among others.

Claims (57)

1. A computer-implemented method, comprising:

controlling an unmanned aerial vehicle to fly over a forestry worksite and capture imagery information with an image capture component;

generating a set of soil disturbance metrics, each having a value indicative of a measure of a machine-induced soil disturbance at a different geographic location in the forestry worksite, based on the imagery information; and

generating an action signal based on the values of the soil disturbance metrics in the set.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein generating a set of soil disturbance metrics comprises:

identifying, from the imagery information, a given geographic location that has a soil disturbance indicator indicative of likely soil disturbance; and

identifying, as the value of the soil disturbance metric, a level of disturbance of the soil at the given geographic location, the disturbance of the soil being measured as a difference in a surface smoothness of the soil at the geographic location relative to a surface smoothness of the soil at other proximate geographic locations.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 2 wherein generating an action signal comprises:

comparing the value of the soil disturbance metric at the given geographic location to a threshold soil disturbance value.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 3 wherein an action signal comprises:

if the value of the soil disturbance metric at the given geographic location exceeds the threshold soil disturbance value, then generating an action signal identifying the given geographic location as a soil disturbance location for which corrective action is to be taken.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 4 wherein generating an action signal comprises:

identifying a type of soil disturbance at the soil disturbance location based on the imagery information.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 5 wherein generating an action signal comprises:

selecting a corrective action to address the soil disturbance at the soil disturbance location, based on the type of soil disturbance at the soil disturbance location.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 6 wherein selecting a corrective action comprises:

identifying a machine at the forestry worksite that can perform the corrective action.

8. The computer-implemented method of claim 7 wherein generating an action signal comprises:

generating a communication signal to the identified machine at the forestry worksite identifying the corrective action to take.

9. The computer-implemented method of claim 8 wherein generating the communication signal comprises:

identifying the soil disturbance location where the selected corrective action is to be performed by the identified machine at the forestry worksite.

10. A computer-implemented method comprising:

controlling an unmanned aerial vehicle to fly over a forestry worksite, after a machine has operated on the worksite, and obtain sensor information indicative of a condition of the worksite;

generating a set of soil disturbance metrics, each having a value indicative of a measure of soil disturbance at a different geographic location in the forestry worksite, based on the sensor information; and

generating an action signal based on the values of the soil disturbance metrics in the set.

11. The computer-implemented method of claim 10 , wherein the condition comprises a topography of the worksite.

12. The computer-implemented method of claim 11 , wherein generating a set of soil disturbance metrics comprises:

identifying, from the sensor information, a given geographic location that has a soil disturbance indicator indicative of likely soil disturbance; and

identifying, as the value of the soil disturbance metric, a level of disturbance of the soil at the given geographic location, the disturbance of the soil being measured as a difference in a height of the soil at the given geographic location relative to a height of the soil at other proximate geographic locations.

13. The computer-implemented method of claim 12 , wherein generating an action signal comprises:

comparing the value of the soil disturbance metric at the given geographic location to a threshold soil disturbance value, wherein the threshold soil disturbance value comprises a level of acceptable soil height deviation across the worksite.

14. The computer-implemented method of claim 13 , wherein an action signal comprises:

identifying, if the soil disturbance metric exceeds the threshold soil disturbance level, the given geographic location as a soil disturbance location for Which corrective action is to be taken.

15. The computer-implemented method of claim 14 , wherein generating an action signal comprises:

identifying a type of soil disturbance at the soil disturbance location based on the sensor information; and

determining if the soil disturbance is machine induced.

16. The computer-implemented method of claim 15 , wherein generating an action signal comprises:

if the soil disturbance is machine induced, then selecting a corrective action to address the soil disturbance at the soil disturbance location.

17. The computer-implemented method of claim 16 , wherein selecting a corrective action comprises:

identifying a machine at the worksite that can perform the corrective action.

18. The computer-implemented method of claim 17 , wherein generating an action signal comprises:

generating a communication signal to the identified machine at the worksite indicating the corrective action to take.

19. The computer-implemented method of claim 18 , wherein generating the communication signal comprises:

identifying the soil disturbance location where the selected corrective action is to be performed.

20. A computer-implemented method comprising:

receiving a request to perform a soil disturbance assessment of a forestry worksite;

generating a flight path for an unmanned aerial vehicle based on the request;

controlling the unmanned aerial vehicle to fly over the forestry worksite and capture imagery information with an image capture component based on the flight path;

generating a map of the forestry worksite having a measured level of soil disturbance based on the imagery information;

identifying a threshold value of soil disturbance;

comparing the measured value of soil disturbance to the threshold value of soil disturbance;

detecting a level of soil disturbance beyond the threshold value of soil disturbance;

identifying a particular sub-area of the forestry worksite that requires repair;

determining a corrective action to repair the particular sub-area of the forestry worksite;

identifying a mobile machine within the worksite capable of carrying out the corrective action;

generating an action signal indicative of the corrective action to the identified mobile machine; and

updating the map of the forestry worksite.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 1, 2018
From: FLOOD, MATTHEW J.; CHERNEY, MARK J.; KAHLER, ANDREW W.; LAWLER, RICHARD
To: DEERE & COMPANY
Reel/Frame 044795/0405 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62565863 · Sep 29, 2017
Related Publication 20190102623A1 · Apr 4, 2019
Cited By (3)
US 12,535,388 US 12,548,099 US 12,731,011