IP Library Granted Patent US 10,603,388
Granted Patent B2
US 10,603,388 · App. 15/678,505 · Granted Mar 31, 2020

Methods for formulating antibody drug conjugate compositions

Inventors: Gillian Payne (Waban, MA); Robert W. Herbst (Braintree, MA); Juma Bridgewater (Tolland, CT)
Assignee: ImmunoGen, Inc.
A61K47/6803A61K47/6849A61K47/6851C07K16/28C07K16/2803C07K16/2863C07K16/30A61K2039/505A61K2039/545C07K2317/24C07K2317/73C07K2317/92C07K2317/94
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,603,388
App. No.
15/678,505
Granted
Mar 31, 2020
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present invention provides improved methods for formulating therapeutic compositions comprising an antibody drug conjugate (“ADC”) that reduce potency variability between batches of ADC and provide for administration of such therapeutic compositions within a narrow intended range.

Claims (111)

1. A method of reducing potency variability in a composition comprising a huMy9-6-sulfo-SPDB-DGN462 antibody benzodiazepine conjugate, the method comprising:

(a) measuring the drug-to-antibody ratio (DAR) for the antibody drug conjugate composition;

(b) determining the upper antibody specification limit and the lower antibody specification limit, wherein the upper antibody specification limit is the target antibody concentration plus the maximum variation allowed by the specification and the lower antibody specification limit is the target antibody concentration minus the maximum variation allowed by the specification;

(c) determining the defined upper benzodiazepine specification limit and the defined lower benzodiazepine specification limit, wherein the defined upper benzodiazepine specification limit is the target benzodiazepine concentration plus the maximum variation allowed by the specification and the defined lower benzodiazepine specification limit is the target benzodiazepine concentration minus the maximum variation allowed by the specification;

(d) determining the calculated upper benzodiazepine specification limit (USL (drug)) as follows:

USL

(

drug

)

µg

/

mL

=

Upper

Antibody

Concentration

Specification

Limit

×

DAR

×

Drug

Mol

.

Wt

.

Antibody

Mol

.

Wt

.

×

1000

(e) determining the calculated lower benzodiazepine specification limit (LSL (drug)) as follows:

LSL

(

drug

)

µg

/

mL

=

Lower

Antibody

Concentration

Specification

Limit

×

DAR

×

Drug

Mol

.

Wt

.

Antibody

Mol

.

Wt

.

×

1000

(f) comparing the calculated USL (drug) of step (d) to the defined upper benzodiazepine specification limit of step (c), and selecting the lower of the two values as the effective upper benzodiazepine specification limit;

(g) comparing the calculated LSL (drug) of step (e) to the defined lower benzodiazepine specification limit of step (c), and selecting the higher of the two values as the effective lower benzodiazepine specification limit; and

(h) formulating the antibody benzodiazepine conjugate composition to a target benzodiazepine concentration that is the midpoint between the effective upper benzodiazepine specification limit and the effective lower benzodiazepine specification limit, thereby reducing potency variability in said composition.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the method narrows the range of the upper and lower specification limits for the drug and the antibody to about ±3-5%.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the method narrows the range of the upper and lower specification limits to about ±4%.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the maximum variation allowed by the specification in step (b) is about ±15%.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the maximum variation allowed by the specification in step (b) is less than about ±10, 11, 12, 13, or 14%.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the maximum variation allowed by the specification in step (c) is about ±15%.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the maximum variation allowed by the specification in step (c) is less than about ±10, 11, 12, 13, or 14%.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 11, 2017
From: PAYNE, GILLIAN; HERBST, ROBERT W.; BRIDGEWATER, JUMA
To: IMMUNOGEN, INC.
Reel/Frame 043544/0673 →
Continuity (3)
Division 14843769 · Sep 2, 2015
Provisional Application 62044592 · Sep 2, 2014
Related Publication 20170348428A1 · Dec 7, 2017