IP Library › Granted Patent US 10,681,624
Granted Patent B2
US 10,681,624 · App. 16/557,582 · Granted Jun 9, 2020

Steady-state beam scanning and codebook generation

Inventors: Vasanthan Raghavan (West Windsor Township, NJ); Jianghong Luo (Skillman, NJ); Raghu Narayan Challa (San Diego, CA); Qijia Liu (Toronto, CA); Junyi Li (Chester, NJ); Alexei Yurievitch Gorokhov (San Diego, CA); Assaf Touboul (Netanya, IL)
Assignee: QUALCOMM Incorporated
H04W48/16H04B7/0456H04B7/0617H04B7/0639H04B7/0695H04W16/28
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,681,624
App. No.
16/557,582
Granted
Jun 9, 2020
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method, an apparatus, and a computer-readable medium may be described in the present disclosure. The apparatus may be a user equipment. The apparatus may determine whether a number of unsuccessful repetitions associated with performance of a first type of scanning exceeds a repetition threshold. The apparatus may perform a second type of beam scanning based on the determination that the number of unsuccessful repetitions exceeded the repetition threshold.

Claims (68)

1. A method of wireless communication by a user equipment (UE), the method comprising:

determining whether a number of unsuccessful repetitions associated with performance of a first type of beam scanning exceeds a repetition threshold; and

performing a second type of beam scanning based on the determination that the number of unsuccessful repetitions exceeded the repetition threshold, wherein the first type of beam scanning includes beam scanning using a flat gain beam or pseudo-omni beam associated with a plurality of subarrays that are different from a first subarray, the first subarray corresponding to use of a current serving beam, and wherein the second type of beam scanning includes beam refinement using a set of directional beams associated with the first subarray.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the performance of the first type of beam scanning and the performance of the second type of beam scanning are based on a codebook.

3. The method of claim 2 , further comprising:

dynamically updating the codebook based on current information associated with a serving beam.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein when the number of unsuccessful repetitions has not exceeded the repetition threshold, and the method further comprising:

measuring a first value from the performance of the first type of beam scanning, wherein the first value is associated with a new serving beam; and

switching to the new serving beam based on a comparison of the first value and a second value which is associated with a current serving beam.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the first value and the second value are based on a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), a signal-to-interference-and-noise-ratio (SINR), a signal-to-noise-plus-distortion ratio (SNDR), a received signal strength indicator (RSSI), a reference signal received power (RSRP), or a reference signal received quality (RSRQ), or any combination thereof.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining to perform the first type of beam scanning before the second type of beam scanning.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the determination to perform the first type of beam scanning before the second type of beam scanning is based on a timescale associated with the first type of beam scanning and changes in channel conditions as observed by the UE.

8. The method of claim 7 , further comprising:

determining the repetition threshold based on the timescale and channel conditions.

9. The method of claim 7 , wherein the timescale is determined based on at least one of a mobility of the UE, an orientation of the mobility of the UE relative to a cluster arrival angle and a carrier frequency, output data from at least one sensor associated with the UE, blockage or fading conditions as observed by the UE, data from a cloud-based server, or data from a base station.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the data from the base station or the data from the cloud-based server includes at least one of a sequence of beams from which the UE determines beam coherence, information about an environment proximate to the UE, or a value associated with the timescale.

11. A method of wireless communication by a user equipment (UE), the method comprising:

determining whether a number of unsuccessful repetitions associated with performance of a first type of beam scanning exceeds a repetition threshold; and

performing a second type of beam scanning based on the determination that the number of unsuccessful repetitions exceeded the repetition threshold, wherein the first type of beam scanning includes beam refinement using a first set of directional beams associated with a first subarray, the first subarray corresponding to use of a current serving beam, and wherein the second type of beam scanning includes beam scanning using a flat gain beam or pseudo-omni beam associated with a plurality of subarrays that are different from the first subarray.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the performance of the first type of beam scanning and the performance of the second type of beam scanning are based on a codebook.

13. The method of claim 12 , further comprising:

dynamically updating the codebook based on current information associated with a serving beam.

14. The method of claim 11 , wherein when the number of unsuccessful repetitions has not exceeded the repetition threshold, and the method further comprising:

measuring a first value from the performance of the first type of beam scanning, wherein the first value is associated with a new serving beam; and

switching to the new serving beam based on a comparison of the first value and a second value which is associated with a current serving beam.

15. The method of claim 14 , wherein the first value and the second value are based on a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), a signal-to-interference-and-noise-ratio (SINR), a signal-to-noise-plus-distortion ratio (SNDR), a received signal strength indicator (RSSI), a reference signal received power (RSRP), or reference signal received quality (RSRQ), or any combination thereof.

16. The method of claim 11 , further comprising:

determining to perform the first type of beam scanning before the second type of beam scanning and changes in channel conditions as observed by the UE.

17. The method of claim 16 , wherein the determination to perform the first type of beam scanning before the second type of beam scanning is based on a timescale associated with the first type of beam scanning and channel conditions.

18. The method of claim 17 , further comprising:

determining the repetition threshold based on the timescale.

19. The method of claim 17 , wherein the timescale is determined based on at least one of a mobility of the UE, an orientation of the mobility of the UE relative to a cluster arrival angle and a carrier frequency, output data from at least one sensor associated with the UE, blockage or fading conditions as observed by the UE, data from a cloud-based server, or data from a base station.

20. The method of claim 19 , wherein the data from the base station or the data from the cloud-based server includes at least one of a sequence of beams from which the UE determines beam coherence, information about an environment proximate to the UE, or a value associated with the timescale.

21. An apparatus for wireless communication, comprising:

a transceiver;

a memory configured to store instructions; and

one or more processors communicatively coupled with the transceiver and the memory, wherein the one or more processors are configured to:

determine whether a number of unsuccessful repetitions associated with performance of a first type of beam scanning exceeds a repetition threshold; and

perform a second type of beam scanning based on the determination that the number of unsuccessful repetitions exceeded the repetition threshold, wherein the first type of beam scanning includes beam scanning using a flat gain beam or pseudo-omni beam associated with a plurality of subarrays that are different from a first subarray, the first subarray corresponding to use of a current serving beam, and wherein the second type of beam scanning includes beam refinement using a set of directional beams associated with the first subarray.

22. The apparatus of claim 21 , wherein the performance of the first type of beam scanning and the performance of the second type of beam scanning are based on a codebook.

23. The apparatus of claim 22 , wherein the one or more processors is further configured to dynamically update the codebook based on current information associated with a serving beam.

24. The apparatus of claim 21 , wherein when the number of unsuccessful repetitions has not exceeded the repetition threshold, and the one or more processors is further configured to:

measure a first value from the performance of the first type of beam scanning, wherein the first value is associated with a new serving beam; and

switch to the new serving beam based on a comparison of the first value and a second value which is associated with a current serving beam.

25. The apparatus of claim 24 , wherein the first value and the second value are based on a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), a signal-to-interference-and-noise-ratio (SINR), a signal-to-noise-plus-distortion ratio (SNDR), a received signal strength indicator (RSSI), a reference signal received power (RSRP), or a reference signal received quality (RSRQ), or any combination thereof.

26. The apparatus of claim 21 , wherein the one or more processors is further configured to determine to perform the first type of beam scanning before the second type of beam scanning.

27. The apparatus of claim 26 , wherein the determination to perform the first type of beam scanning before the second type of beam scanning is based on a timescale associated with the first type of beam scanning and changes in channel conditions as observed by the UE.

28. The apparatus of claim 27 , wherein the one or more processors is further configured to determine the repetition threshold based on the timescale and channel conditions.

29. The apparatus of claim 27 , wherein the timescale is determined based on at least one of a mobility of the UE, an orientation of the mobility of the UE relative to a cluster arrival angle and a carrier frequency, output data from at least one sensor associated with the UE, blockage or fading conditions as observed by the UE, data from a cloud-based server, or data from a base station.

30. The apparatus of claim 29 , wherein the data from the base station or the data from the cloud-based server includes at least one of a sequence of beams from which the UE determines beam coherence, information about an environment proximate to the UE, or a value associated with the timescale.

31. An apparatus for wireless communication, comprising:

a transceiver;

a memory configured to store instructions; and

one or more processors communicatively coupled with the transceiver and the memory, wherein the one or more processors are configured to:

determine whether a number of unsuccessful repetitions associated with performance of a first type of beam scanning exceeds a repetition threshold; and

perform a second type of beam scanning based on the determination that the number of unsuccessful repetitions exceeded the repetition threshold, wherein the first type of beam scanning includes beam refinement using a first set of directional beams associated with a first subarray, the first subarray corresponding to use of a current serving beam, and wherein the second type of beam scanning includes beam scanning using a flat gain beam or pseudo-omni beam associated with a plurality of subarrays that are different from the first subarray.

32. The apparatus of claim 31 , wherein the performance of the first type of beam scanning and the performance of the second type of beam scanning are based on a codebook.

33. The apparatus of claim 32 , wherein the one or more processors is further configured to dynamically update the codebook based on current information associated with a serving beam.

34. The apparatus of claim 31 , wherein when the number of unsuccessful repetitions has not exceeded the repetition threshold, and the one or more processors is further configured to:

measure a first value from the performance of the first type of beam scanning, wherein the first value is associated with a new serving beam; and

switch to the new serving beam based on a comparison of the first value and a second value which is associated with a current serving beam.

35. The apparatus of claim 34 , wherein the first value and the second value are based on a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), a signal-to-interference-and-noise-ratio (SINR), a signal-to-noise-plus-distortion ratio (SNDR), a received signal strength indicator (RSSI), a reference signal received power (RSRP), or reference signal received quality (RSRQ), or any combination thereof.

36. The apparatus of claim 31 , wherein the one or more processors is further configured to determine to perform the first type of beam scanning before the second type of beam scanning and changes in channel conditions as observed by the UE.

37. The apparatus of claim 36 , wherein the determination to perform the first type of beam scanning before the second type of beam scanning is based on a timescale associated with the first type of beam scanning and channel conditions.

38. The apparatus of claim 37 , wherein the one or more processors is further configured to determine the repetition threshold based on the timescale.

39. The apparatus of claim 37 , wherein the timescale is determined based on at least one of a mobility of the UE, an orientation of the mobility of the UE relative to a cluster arrival angle and a carrier frequency, output data from at least one sensor associated with the UE, blockage or fading conditions as observed by the UE, data from a cloud-based server, or data from a base station.

40. The apparatus of claim 39 , wherein the data from the base station or the data from the cloud-based server includes at least one of a sequence of beams from which the UE determines beam coherence, information about an environment proximate to the UE, or a value associated with the timescale.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 30, 2019
From: RAGHAVAN, VASANTHAN; LUO, JIANGHONG; CHALLA, RAGHU NARAYAN; LIU, QIJIA; LI, JUNYI; GOROKHOV, ALEXEI YURIEVITCH; TOUBOUL, ASSAF
To: QUALCOMM INCORPORATED
Reel/Frame 050226/0345 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 15684861 · Aug 23, 2017
Provisional Application 62426110 · Nov 23, 2016
Related Publication 20190387463A1 · Dec 19, 2019