IP Library › Granted Patent US 10,762,980
Granted Patent B2
US 10,762,980 · App. 14/891,906 · Granted Sep 1, 2020

Computer-implemented methods of determining protein viscosity

Inventors: Bernhardt Levy Trout (Lexington, MA); Bernhard Helk (Loerrach, DE); Neeraj Jagdish Agrawal (Thousand Oaks, CA)
Assignees: Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Novartis Pharma AG
G16B15/00G01N11/00G01N33/6803G01N33/6854G01N2011/006
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,762,980
App. No.
14/891,906
Granted
Sep 1, 2020
Kind
B2
Abstract

Provided herein are high-throughput methods for identifying a candidate antibody based on viscosity of the candiate antibody.

Claims (18)

1. A method for producing a low-viscosity antibody solution, the method comprising:

(a) identifying surface-exposed amino acid residues in tertiary structures of a plurality of antibodies by computing total solvent accessible area (SAA) values for amino acid residues of the antibodies based on partial charge values assigned to side-chain atoms of the antibodies, wherein an amino acid residue is identified as a surface-exposed amino acid residue if it has a SAA of greater than a threshold value;

(b) identifying atoms that are within a distance R and belong to a side-chain of an exposed amino acid residues identified in (a);

(c) computing an atomic spatial charge map (SCM) value for each atom identified in (b), wherein the atomic SCM value is the sum of partial charges of the atoms identified in (b);

(d) computing a SCM score for each of the antibodies based on the atomic SCM values computed in (c); and

(e) predicting relative viscosity of each of the antibodies based on the SCM score computed in (d) by comparing the SCM scores computed in (d) to each other, wherein an antibody is predicted to have a low viscosity if the SCM score computed in (d) is lower than the SCM scores of the other antibodies of the plurality; and

(f) producing a solution comprising the antibody predicted to have a low viscosity.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the tertiary structure of the antibodies is a Fab domain or a Fv domain of the antibody.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the partial charge in step (a) is assigned using a software tool selected from CHARMM force field, PropKa, Accelrys, and Schrodinger.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the threshold value is 1-50 Å 2 .

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the distance R is 5-20 Å.

6. The method of claim 4 , wherein the threshold value is 10 Å 2 .

7. The method of claim 5 , wherein the distance R is 10 Å.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the atomic SCM value in (c) is computed based on a pH value of greater than or equal to 7.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the atomic SCM value in (c) is computed based on a pH value of less than or equal to 5.5.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the antibody is a monoclonal antibody.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the antibody is an antibody fragment.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the antibody fragment is a Fv, Fab, Fab′ or F(ab′)2 fragment.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 6, 2019
From: TROUT, BERNHARDT LEVY; AGRAWAL, NEERAJ JAGDISH
To: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
Reel/Frame 049967/0085 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 6, 2019
From: HELK, BERNHARD
To: NOVARTIS PHARMA AG
Reel/Frame 049967/0647 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 61824680 · May 17, 2013
Related Publication 20160132634A1 · May 12, 2016