IP Library › Granted Patent US 10,831,252
Granted Patent B2
US 10,831,252 · App. 15/658,494 · Granted Nov 10, 2020

Power efficiency-aware node component assembly

Inventors: Eun Kyung Lee (Elmsford, NY); Bilge Acun (Urbana, IL); Yoonho Park (Chappaqua, NY)
Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
G06F1/3206G06F1/32G06F1/3243G06F1/3275G06F1/3287G06F1/3296
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,831,252
App. No.
15/658,494
Granted
Nov 10, 2020
Kind
B2
Abstract

Sub-components assembled into a computer are selected based on sub-component power efficiency levels (for example, low, medium, high) and/or anticipated usage of the computer. Multiple units of each type of sub-component (for example, a CPU) are tested to determine a power efficiency level of each unit. Computers in which sub-component efficiency levels are desired to match an overall computer efficiency level, receive sub-component units of corresponding efficiency level. Computers anticipated to run applications that make intensive use of a given type of sub-component receive the given units having a higher efficiency level. Computers anticipated to run applications that make little use of a given type of sub-component receive a physical unit having a lower efficiency level. Computers anticipated to run a wide variety of applications of no particular usage intensity for a given type of sub-component, receive a unit having an average efficiency level.

Claims (64)

1. A method comprising:

receiving a component efficiency dataset that includes component efficiency information pertaining to a plurality of computer components of a given type, including a first component and a second component, wherein the component efficiency dataset includes a collective efficiency metric pertaining to the plurality of computer components;

receiving a component requirements profile corresponding to a computer application;

determining the first component has a first efficiency metric that is less than the collective efficiency metric;

determining the second component has a second efficiency metric that is greater than the collective efficiency metric;

selecting the first component and the second component for installation into a computer assembly;

producing a computer assembly specification;

sending the computer assembly specification to an automated assembly workstation interface;

receiving a completed computer assembly configuration dataset that represents a configuration of an assembled computer;

automatically verifying information in the completed computer assembly configuration dataset corresponds to information in the computer assembly specification; and

specifying a physical placement within a computing facility where the assembled computer is to be installed based at least in part on the configuration of the assembled computer.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the computer assembly specification includes information that: (i) uniquely identifies the computer assembly; and (ii) uniquely identifies the first computer component and the second computer component.

3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining that the first computer component failed during operation of the computer assembly; and

in response to determining that the first computer component failed, replacing the first computer component with a replacement computer component having an efficiency metric that matches the first efficiency metric within a threshold tolerance.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first efficiency metric includes a rate of energy dissipated by the first computer component while the selected computer component operates under specified operating conditions.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the component requirement profile includes information indicative of a plurality of workload levels imposed on a respectively corresponding plurality of computer components, including the selected computer component, during execution of the computer application by the computer assembly.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

automatically verifying information in the completed computer assembly configuration dataset corresponds to information in the computer assembly specification comprises using a technique selected from the group consisting of: machine vision, radio frequency identification, and reading identification information encoded in a memory chip.

7. The method of claim 1 wherein the collective efficiency metric comprises an arithmetic mean of a plurality of efficiency metrics respectively pertaining to the plurality of computer components.

8. A computer program product comprising:

one or more computer readable storage media and program instructions stored on the one or more computer readable storage media, the program instructions comprising instructions to perform:

receiving a component efficiency dataset that includes component efficiency information pertaining to a plurality of computer components of a given type, including a first component and a second component, wherein the component efficiency dataset includes a collective efficiency metric pertaining to the plurality of computer components;

receiving a component requirements profile corresponding to a computer application;

determining the first component has a first efficiency metric that is less than the collective efficiency metric;

determining the second component has a second efficiency metric that is greater than the collective efficiency metric;

selecting the first component and the second component for installation into a computer assembly;

producing a computer assembly specification;

sending the computer assembly specification to an automated assembly workstation interface;

receiving a completed computer assembly configuration dataset that represents a configuration of an assembled computer;

automatically verifying information in the completed computer assembly configuration dataset corresponds to information in the computer assembly specification; and

specifying a physical placement within a computing facility where the assembled computer is to be installed based at least in part on the configuration of the assembled computer.

9. The computer program product of claim 8 , wherein the computer assembly specification includes information that: (i) uniquely identifies the computer assembly; and (ii) uniquely identifies the first computer component and the second computer component.

10. The computer program product of claim 8 , further comprising program instructions to perform:

determining that the first computer component failed during operation of the computer assembly; and

in response to determining that the first computer component failed, replacing the first computer component with a replacement computer component having an efficiency metric that matches the first efficiency metric within a threshold tolerance.

11. The computer program product of claim 8 , wherein the first efficiency metric includes a rate of energy dissipated by the first computer component while the selected computer component operates under specified operating conditions.

12. The computer program product of claim 8 , wherein the component requirement profile includes information indicative of a plurality of workload levels imposed on a respectively corresponding plurality of computer components, including the selected computer component, during execution of the computer application by the computer assembly.

13. The computer program product of claim 8 , wherein:

automatically verifying information in the completed computer assembly configuration dataset corresponds to information in the computer assembly specification comprises using a technique selected from the group consisting of: machine vision, radio frequency identification, and reading identification information encoded in a memory chip.

14. The computer program product claim 8 wherein the collective efficiency metric comprises an arithmetic mean of a plurality of efficiency metrics respectively pertaining to the plurality of computer components.

15. A computer system comprising:

one or more computer processors;

one or more computer-readable storage media;

program instructions stored on the computer-readable storage media for execution by at least one of the one or more processors, the program instructions comprising instructions to perform:

receiving a component efficiency dataset that includes component efficiency information pertaining to a plurality of computer components of a given type, including a first component and a second component, wherein the component efficiency dataset includes a collective efficiency metric pertaining to the plurality of computer components;

receiving a component requirements profile corresponding to a computer application;

determining the first component has a first efficiency metric that is less than the collective efficiency metric;

determining the second component has a second efficiency metric that is greater than the collective efficiency metric;

selecting the first component and the second component for installation into a computer assembly;

producing a computer assembly specification;

sending the computer assembly specification to an automated assembly workstation interface;

receiving a completed computer assembly configuration dataset that represents a configuration of an assembled computer;

automatically verifying information in the completed computer assembly configuration dataset corresponds to information in the computer assembly specification; and

specifying a physical placement within a computing facility where the assembled computer is to be installed based at least in part on the configuration of the assembled computer.

16. The computer system of claim 15 , wherein the computer assembly specification includes information that: (i) uniquely identifies the computer assembly;

and (ii) uniquely identifies the first computer component and the second computer component.

17. The computer system of claim 15 , further comprising program instructions to perform:

determining that the first computer component failed during operation of the computer assembly; and

in response to determining that the first computer component failed, replacing the first computer component with a replacement computer component having an efficiency metric that matches the first efficiency metric within a threshold tolerance.

18. The computer system of claim 15 , wherein the first efficiency metric includes a rate of energy dissipated by the first computer component while the selected computer component operates under specified operating conditions.

19. The computer system of claim 15 , wherein the component requirement profile includes information indicative of a plurality of workload levels imposed on a respectively corresponding plurality of computer components, including the selected computer component, during execution of the computer application by the computer assembly.

20. The computer system of claim 15 , wherein:

automatically verifying information in the completed computer assembly configuration dataset corresponds to information in the computer assembly specification comprises using a technique selected from the group consisting of: machine vision, radio frequency identification, and reading identification information encoded in a memory chip.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 25, 2017
From: LEE, EUN KYUNG; ACUN, BILGE; PARK, YOONHO
To: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 043086/0123 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20190033944A1 · Jan 31, 2019