Method and system for fuel injector balancing
Methods and systems are provided for reducing errors in estimated fuel rail pressure incurred at the time of a scheduled injection event due to engine-driven cyclic fuel rail pressure changes. In one example, a pulse-width commanded during a scheduled injection event is determined as a function fuel rail pressure samples collected over a moving window that is customized for the corresponding fuel injector. In another example, the commanded pulse-width is determined as a function of an average fuel rail pressure sampled during a quiet zone of injector operation and predicted fuel rail pressure altering events occurring between the quiet zone and the scheduled injection event.
1. A method for an engine, comprising:
operating in a first mode including estimating an average fuel rail pressure for a scheduled injection event at a fuel injector as a moving average over a pressure cycle since a last injection event at the given injector; and
operating in a second mode including estimating the average fuel rail pressure for the scheduled injection event based on an average fuel rail pressure sampled during a quiet period of an earlier injection event at another injector, and predicted injection events and fuel pump stroke events occurring between the earlier injection event and the scheduled injection event.
2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising, in each of the first and second modes, adjusting a pulse-width commanded to the given fuel injector at the scheduled injection event based on the estimated average fuel rail pressure.
3. The method of claim 2 , further comprising, in each of the first and second modes, learning a fuel mass error of the given fuel injector based on the estimated average fuel rail pressure and a fuel rail pressure sensed after the scheduled injection event; and
adjusting a transfer function of the given fuel injector to converge the fuel mass error of the given fuel injector towards a common fuel mass error across all fuel injectors of the engine.
4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising operating in the first mode responsive to pressure based injector balancing conditions not being met, and operating in the second mode responsive to pressure based injector balancing conditions being met.
5. The method of claim 2 , further comprising transitioning from the first mode to the second mode responsive to a decrease in engine speed.
6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the given fuel injector and the another fuel injector are each direct fuel injectors, and wherein while operating in each of the first and second modes, a cam lobe actuated high pressure direct injection fuel pump is enabled.
7. The method of claim 6 , wherein during the first mode, the pressure cycle includes at least one stroke of each cam lobe of the high pressure direct injection fuel pump.
8. The method of claim 1 , wherein during the second mode, the estimating includes:
predicting a decrease in the average fuel rail pressure sampled during the quiet period due to the injection events occurring between the earlier injection event and the scheduled injection event; and
predicting an increase in the average fuel rail pressure sampled during the quiet period due to the fuel pump stroke events occurring between the earlier injection event and the scheduled injection event.