IP Library › Granted Patent US 10,857,611
Granted Patent B2
US 10,857,611 · App. 14/285,371 · Granted Dec 8, 2020

Systems and methods for statistically analyzing welding operations

Inventor: Bernard J. Vogel (Troy, OH)
Assignee: ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC.
B23K9/095B23K9/0953B23K9/0956B23K9/1043
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,857,611
App. No.
14/285,371
Granted
Dec 8, 2020
Kind
B2
Abstract

A welding system including a welding power source including power conversion circuitry adapted to receive primary power and to convert the primary power to a weld power output for use in a welding operation and a controller communicatively coupled to the welding power source are provided. The controller is adapted to determine a statistical signature of at least one parameter of a welding process and to utilize the statistical signature to determine at least one of an electrode type, an electrode diameter, and a shielding gas type during the welding operation.

Claims (19)

1. A method comprising:

detecting initiation of a welding process;

initializing a default setting for one or more parameters for the welding process;

monitor at least one of a current waveform or a voltage waveform during the welding process;

determining a statistical signature of the welding process based on the at least one current waveform or voltage waveform, wherein the statistical signature is one of an average short circuit duration, an average short circuit frequency, a current versus wire feed speed profile, or a percentage of total short circuits that exceed a predefined threshold; and

distinguishing between two or more electrode types to determine an electrode type being utilized in the welding process based on the determined statistical signature, wherein the electrode type being utilized is determined by one of comparing the statistical signature to a statistical value stored in a lookup table or comparing the statistical signature to a previously obtained measurement.

2. The method of claim 1 , further configured to determine a desired setting for the one or more parameters of the welding process based on the determined electrode type.

3. The method of claim 2 , configured to deactivate welding when the desired setting is substantially different than the default setting.

4. The method of claim 2 , configured to initialize the desired setting in place of the default setting when the desired setting and the default setting are substantially different.

5. The method of claim 2 , further configured to determine the presence or absence of a substantial difference between the desired setting and the default setting and, when the presence of a substantial difference is detected, to alert an operator to the presence of a detected error.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more parameters for the welding process comprise one or more arc force settings.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the statistical signature is an average short circuit duration for a plurality of short circuit events, and the electrode type being utilized is determined by comparing the average short circuit duration to a predefined threshold.

8. The method of claim 7 wherein the predefined threshold is stored in a lookup table.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the statistical signature is an average short circuit duration for a plurality of short circuit events, and the controller is configured to distinguish between a 3/32″ E6010 electrode and a 3/32″ E7018 electrode by comparing the average short circuit duration to a predefined threshold average short circuit duration.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the statistical signature is an average short circuit duration for a plurality of short circuit events, and the controller is configured to distinguish between a ⅛″ E6010 electrode and a ⅛″ E7018 electrode by comparing the average short circuit duration to a predefined threshold average short circuit duration.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the statistical signature is an average short circuit duration for a plurality of short circuit events, and the controller is configured to distinguish between a E6010 electrode and a E7018 electrode by comparing the average short circuit duration to a predefined threshold average short circuit duration.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein the statistical signature is an average short circuit duration for a plurality of short circuit events, and the controller is configured to distinguish between a ⅛″ E6010 electrode and a 3/32″ E6010 electrode by comparing the average short circuit duration to a predefined threshold average short circuit duration.

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein the statistical signature is an average short circuit duration for a plurality of short circuit events, and the controller is configured to distinguish between a ⅛″ E6010 electrode and a 5/32″ E6010 electrode by comparing the average short circuit duration to a predefined threshold average short circuit duration.

14. The method of claim 1 , wherein the statistical signature is an average short circuit duration for a plurality of short circuit events, and the controller is configured to distinguish between a ⅛″ E7018 electrode and a 3/32″ E7018 electrode by comparing the average short circuit duration to a predefined threshold average short circuit duration.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 23, 2018
From: VOGEL, BERNARD J.
To: ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC.
Reel/Frame 045332/0051 →
Continuity (3)
Division 12971881 · Dec 17, 2010
Provisional Application 61293070 · Jan 7, 2010
Related Publication 20140251970A1 · Sep 11, 2014
Cited By (1)
US 12,708,954