Automated diagnosis and treatment of crop infestations
View Patent ↗Disclosed are various embodiments for automating the diagnosis of crop infestations and estimating crop yields. In some embodiments, a field report that includes an image of a crop and a location of a corresponding field is received from a computing device. The image of the crop is processed using computer-vision techniques to identify a pathogen affecting the crop. A biocide to apply to the crop to treat the pathogen is then identified. In some embodiments, the yield of the crop can also be estimated. In such embodiments, a field report that includes images of plants in a field and an identifier of the field is received. A computer-vision technique is applied to each image to determine an individual yield of each plant in an image. An estimate of the yield of the crop is then calculated based on the individual yields of the plants and the size of the field.
1. A system, comprising:
a first computing device comprising a processor and a memory; and
machine readable instructions stored in the memory that, when executed by the processor, cause the first computing device to at least:
receive a field report from a second computing device, the field report comprising an image of a crop and a location of a corresponding field;
select a computer-vision technique;
process the image of the crop using the computer-vision technique to identify a pathogen affecting the crop;
identify a biocide to apply to the crop based at least in part on an identity of the pathogen;
process the image of the crop using the computer-vision technique to determine a severity of an affliction of the pathogen; and
calculate an amount of the biocide to apply to the crop based at least in part on the severity of the affliction of the pathogen and a seed type of the crop in the corresponding field.
2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the machine readable instructions cause the first computing device to further calculate the amount of the biocide to apply to the crop based at least in part on a prior biocide application to the crop in the corresponding field.
3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the machine readable instructions cause the first computing device to further calculate the amount of the biocide to apply to the crop based at least in part on planting data for the crop in the corresponding field.
4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the machine readable instructions cause the first computing device to further calculate a predicted yield for the crop based at least in part on the pathogen, the severity of the pathogen, and the amount of the biocide to be applied to the crop.
5. The system of claim 1 , wherein the machine readable instructions that cause the first computing device to identify the biocide to apply to the crop based at least in part on the identity of the pathogen further cause the first computing device to identify the biocide based at least in part on one or more of a prior biocide application to the crop in the corresponding field, planting data for the crop in the corresponding field, a seed type of the crop in the corresponding field, irrigation data associated with the corresponding field, fertilizer application data associated with the corresponding field, or weather data associated with the corresponding field.
6. A computer-implemented method, comprising:
receiving a field report from a computing device, the field report comprising an image of a crop and a location of a corresponding field;
selecting a computer-vision technique;
processing the image of the crop using the computer-vision technique to identify a pathogen affecting the crop;
identifying a biocide to apply to the crop based at least in part on an identity of the pathogen;
processing the image of the crop using the computer-vision technique to determine a severity of an affliction of the pathogen; and
calculating an amount of the biocide to apply to the crop based at least in part on the severity of the affliction of the pathogen and a seed type of the crop in the corresponding field.
7. The computer-implemented method of claim 6 , wherein calculating the amount of the biocide to apply to the crop is further based at least in part on a prior biocide application to the crop in the corresponding field.
8. The computer-implemented method of claim 6 , wherein calculating the amount of the biocide to apply to the crop is further based at least in part on planting data for the crop in the corresponding field.
9. The computer-implemented method of claim 6 , further comprising calculating a predicted yield for the crop based at least in part on the pathogen, the severity of the pathogen, and the amount of the biocide to be applied to the crop.
10. The computer-implemented method of claim 6 , wherein identifying the biocide to apply to the crop is further based at least in part on the identity of the pathogen further cause the computing device to identify the biocide based at least in part on one or more of a prior biocide application to the crop in the corresponding field, planting data for the crop in the corresponding field, a seed type of the crop in the corresponding field, irrigation data associated with the corresponding field, fertilizer application data associated with the corresponding field, or weather data associated with the corresponding field.
11. A non-transitory, computer-readable medium comprising machine-readable instructions that, when executed by a processor of a first computing device, cause the first computing device to at least:
receive a field report from a second computing device, the field report comprising an image of a crop and a location of a corresponding field;
select a computer-vision technique;
process the image of the crop using the computer-vision technique to identify a pathogen affecting the crop;
identify a biocide to apply to the crop based at least in part on an identity of the pathogen;
process the image of the crop using the computer-vision technique to determine a severity of an affliction of the pathogen; and
calculate an amount of the biocide to apply to the crop based at least in part on the severity of the affliction of the pathogen and a seed type of the crop in the corresponding field.
12. The non-transitory, computer-readable medium of claim 11 , wherein the machine readable instructions cause the first computing device to further calculate the amount of the biocide to apply to the crop based at least in part on a prior biocide application to the crop in the corresponding field.
13. The non-transitory, computer-readable medium of claim 11 , wherein the machine readable instructions cause the first computing device to further calculate the amount of the biocide to apply to the crop based at least in part on planting data for the crop in the corresponding field.
14. The non-transitory, computer-readable medium of claim 11 , wherein the machine readable instructions cause the first computing device to further calculate a predicted yield for the crop based at least in part on the pathogen, the severity of the pathogen, and the amount of the biocide to be applied to the crop.
15. The non-transitory, computer-readable medium of claim 11 , wherein the machine readable instructions that cause the first computing device to identify the biocide to apply to the crop based at least in part on the identity of the pathogen further cause the first computing device to identify the biocide based at least in part on one or more of a prior biocide application to the crop in the corresponding field, planting data for the crop in the corresponding field, a seed type of the crop in the corresponding field, irrigation data associated with the corresponding field, fertilizer application data associated with the corresponding field, or weather data associated with the corresponding field.