Creating cost models using standard templates and key-value pair differential analysis

1. A computing device comprising:

a processor; and

a storage device storing a set of instructions, wherein an execution of the set of instructions by the processor configures the computing device to perform acts comprising:

receiving a new contract comprising a set of key-value pairs, each key-value pair comprising a question and an answer that correspond to a field of information in a document for the new contract;

computing a similarity measure between the new contract and an existing contract based on a set of variance definitions for determining differences between the set of key-value pairs of the new contract and a corresponding set of key-value pairs of the existing contract;

generating a cost model of the new contract based on the similarity measure and a cost model of the existing contract; and

updating the cost model of the new contract upon determining that a new version of the existing contract has been created and a similarity measure between the new version of the existing contract and the new contract is above a predetermined threshold.

2. The computing device of claim 1 , wherein the new contract is generated based on a template having paragraphs with holes that correspond to fields of information.

3. The computing device of claim 1 , wherein the set of variance definitions comprises instructions for computing (i) distance values between corresponding key-value pairs of the new contract document and of the existing contract document and (ii) the similarity measure based on the distance values.

4. The computing device of claim 1 , wherein the set of variance definitions comprises mappings for non-numerical terms to numerical values in a context of a domain type of the new contract document.

5. The computing device of claim 1 , wherein the set of variance definitions is identified from a plurality of sets of variance definitions based on a domain type of the new contract document.

6. The computing device of claim 1 , wherein generating the cost model of the new contract document comprises:

determining an efficiency offset based on a pattern of similarity between the key-value pairs of the new contract and the key-value pairs of the existing contract; and

applying the determined efficiency offset to the cost model of the new contract.

7. The computing device of claim 1 , wherein:

the existing contract is a first existing contract; and

the computing device is further configured to perform acts comprising:

identifying a second existing contract based on a similarity measure between the new contract and the second existing contract; and

generating an updated cost model for the second existing contract based on the cost model of the new contract.

8. A computer program product comprising:

one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage devices and program instructions stored on at least one of the one or more non-transitory storage devices, the program instructions executable by a processor, the program instructions comprising sets of instructions for:

receiving a new contract comprising a set of key-value pairs, each key-value pair comprising a question and an answer that correspond to a field of information in a document for the new contract;

computing a similarity measure between the new contract and an existing contract based on a set of variance definitions for determining differences between the set of key-value pairs of the new contract and a corresponding set of key-value pairs of the existing contract;

generating a cost model of the new contract based on the similarity measure and a cost model of the existing contract; and

updating the cost model of the new contract upon determining that a new version of the existing contract has been created and a similarity measure between the new version of the existing contract and the new contract is above a predetermined threshold.

9. The computer program product of claim 8 , wherein the new contract is generated based on a template having paragraphs with holes that correspond to fields of information.

10. The computer program product of claim 8 , wherein the set of variance definitions comprises instructions for computing (i) distance values between corresponding key-value pairs of the new contract document and of the existing contract document and (ii) the similarity measure based on the distance values.

11. The computer program product of claim 8 , wherein the set of variance definitions comprises mappings for non-numerical terms to numerical values in a context of a domain type of the new contract document.

12. The computer program product of claim 8 , wherein the set of variance definitions is identified from a plurality of sets of variance definitions based on a domain type of the new contract document.

13. The computer program product of claim 8 , wherein generating the cost model of the new contract document comprises:

determining an efficiency offset based on a pattern of similarity between the key-value pairs of the new contract and the key-value pairs of the existing contract; and

applying the determined efficiency offset to the cost model of the new contract.

14. The computer program product of claim 8 , wherein:

the existing contract is a first existing contract; and

the program instructions further comprising sets of instructions for:

identifying a second existing contract based on a similarity measure between the new contract and the second existing contract; and

generating an updated cost model for the second existing contract based on the cost model of the new contract.

15. A computer-implemented method comprising:

receiving a new contract comprising a set of key-value pairs, each key-value pair comprising a question and an answer that correspond to a field of information in a document for the new contract;

computing a similarity measure between the new contract and an existing contract based on a set of variance definitions for determining differences between the set of key-value pairs of the new contract and a corresponding set of key-value pairs of the existing contract;

generating a cost model of the new contract based on the similarity measure and a cost model of the existing contract; and

updating the cost model of the new contract upon determining that a new version of the existing contract has been created and a similarity measure between the new version of the existing contract and the new contract is above a predetermined threshold.

16. The computer-implemented method of claim 15 , wherein the set of variance definitions comprises instructions for computing (i) distance values between corresponding key-value pairs of the new contract document and of the existing contract document and (ii) the similarity measure based on the distance values.

17. The computer-implemented method of claim 15 , wherein the set of variance definitions comprises mappings for non-numerical terms to numerical values in a context of a domain type of the new contract document.

18. The computer-implemented method of claim 15 , wherein the set of variance definitions is identified from a plurality of sets of variance definitions based on a domain type of the new contract document.

19. The computer-implemented method of claim 15 , wherein generating the cost model of the new contract document comprises:

determining an efficiency offset based on a pattern of similarity between the key-value pairs of the new contract and the key-value pairs of the existing contract; and

applying the determined efficiency offset to the cost model of the new contract.

20. The computer-implemented method of claim 15 , wherein the existing contract is a first existing contract, the method further comprising:

identifying a second existing contract based on a similarity measure between the new contract and the second existing contract; and

generating an updated cost model for the second existing contract based on the cost model of the new contract.