IP Library › Granted Patent US 11,048,741
Granted Patent B2
US 11,048,741 · App. 16/399,184 · Granted Jun 29, 2021

Bias detection and estimation under technical portfolio reviews

Inventors: Celia Cintas (Nairobi, KE); William Ogallo (Nairobi, KE); Aisha Walcott (Nairobi, KE); Sekou Lionel Remy (Nairobi, KE)
Assignee: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
G06F16/345G06F16/335G06F16/355G06F40/216G06F40/284G06N5/04
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,048,741
App. No.
16/399,184
Granted
Jun 29, 2021
Kind
B2
Abstract

A bias detection method, system, and computer program product include creating a context of an applicant based on a profile of the applicant and a context of a reviewer based on a profile of the reviewer, predicting a probability of overlapping data points between the applicant and the reviewer, building enriched embeddings for a deep learning model based on the context of the applicant, the context of the reviewer, the overlapping data points, and text from a review and a final decision by the reviewer, and calculating a bias score via a deep learning model run over the enriched embeddings.

Claims (58)

1. A computer-implemented bias detection method for generating a contextual measurement of class and methodological bias in a review processes, the method comprising:

creating a context of an applicant based on a profile of the applicant and a context of a reviewer based on a profile of the reviewer;

predicting a probability of overlapping data points between the applicant and the reviewer;

building enriched embeddings for a deep learning model based on the context of the applicant, the context of the reviewer, the overlapping data points, and text from a review and a final decision by the reviewer; and

calculating a bias score via the deep learning model run over the enriched embeddings,

wherein the bias score includes a combination of:

a class bias;

a methodological bias;

an ecological fallacy;

a reviewer bias;

a reviewer variation; and

an implicit bias.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising outputting the bias score to a profile of the reviewer if the bias score is greater than a preset value.

3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising generating a report that highlights instances of bias in the review by the reviewer based on the bias score.

4. The method of claim 2 , further comprising generating a report that highlights instances of bias in the review by the reviewer based on the output bias score.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the bias score includes a combination of:

a class bias; and

a position related parameter.

6. The method of claim 1 , embodied in a cloud-computing environment.

7. A computer program product for bias detection, the computer program product comprising a computer-readable storage medium having program instructions embodied therewith for generating a contextual measurement of class and methodological bias in a review processes, the program instructions executable by a computer to cause the computer to perform:

creating a context of an applicant based on a profile of the applicant and a context of a reviewer based on a profile of the reviewer;

predicting a probability of overlapping data points between the applicant and the reviewer;

building enriched embeddings for a deep learning model based on the context of the applicant, the context of the reviewer, the overlapping data points, and text from a review and a final decision by the reviewer; and

calculating a bias score via the deep learning model run over the enriched embeddings,

wherein the bias score includes a combination of:

a class bias;

a methodological bias;

an ecological fallacy;

a reviewer bias;

a reviewer variation; and

an implicit bias.

8. The computer program product of claim 7 , further comprising outputting the bias score to a profile of the reviewer if the bias score is greater than a preset value.

9. The computer program product of claim 7 , further comprising generating a report that highlights instances of bias in the review by the reviewer based on the bias score.

10. The computer program product of claim 8 , further comprising generating a report that highlights instances of bias in the review by the reviewer based on the output bias score.

11. The computer program product of claim 7 , wherein the bias score includes a combination of:

a class bias; and

a position related parameter.

12. A bias detection system for generating a contextual measurement of class and methodological bias in a review processes, the system comprising:

a processor; and

a memory, the memory storing instructions to cause the processor to perform:

creating a context of an applicant based on a profile of the applicant and a context of a reviewer based on a profile of the reviewer;

predicting a probability of overlapping data points between the applicant and the reviewer;

building enriched embeddings for a deep learning model based on the context of the applicant, the context of the reviewer, the overlapping data points, and text from a review and a final decision by the reviewer; and

calculating a bias score via the deep learning model run over the enriched embeddings,

wherein the bias score includes a combination of:

a class bias;

a methodological bias;

an ecological fallacy;

a reviewer bias;

a reviewer variation; and

an implicit bias.

13. The system of claim 12 , further comprising outputting the bias score to a profile of the reviewer if the bias score is greater than a preset value.

14. The system of claim 12 , further comprising generating a report that highlights instances of bias in the review by the reviewer based on the bias score.

15. The system of claim 13 , further comprising generating a report that highlights instances of bias in the review by the reviewer based on the output bias score.

16. The system of claim 12 , wherein the bias score includes a combination of:

a class bias; and

a position related parameter.

17. The system of claim 12 , embodied in a cloud-computing environment.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 2, 2019
From: CINTAS, CELIA; OGALLO, WILLIAM; WALCOTT, AISHA; REMY, SEKOU LIONEL
To: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 049057/0548 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20200349182A1 · Nov 5, 2020
Cited By (3)
US 12,481,916 US 12,493,751 US 12,632,670