IP Library Granted Patent US 11,066,071
Granted Patent B2
US 11,066,071 · App. 16/179,897 · Granted Jul 20, 2021

Coasting control method based on overspeed response and eco-friendly vehicle employing the same

Inventor: Jee-Wook Huh (Gyeonggi-do, KR)
Assignees: Hyundai Motor Company; Kia Motors Corporation
B60W30/143B60W10/08B60W30/18109B60W40/105B60W2510/083B60W2520/10B60W2720/10
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,066,071
App. No.
16/179,897
Granted
Jul 20, 2021
Kind
B2
Abstract

A coasting control method based on an overspeed response and an eco-friendly vehicle employing the same are provided. The coasting control method includes performing an active coasting control when an event for a section speed enforcement area is determined while a vehicle is traveling to allow the vehicle to pass through the section speed enforcement area based on a vehicle position at an event occurrence time.

Claims (47)

1. A coasting control method comprising:

determining, by a controller, an event for a section speed enforcement area while a vehicle is being driven, wherein the section speed enforcement area comprises a start camera and an end camera received by the controller; and

in response to determining the event for the section speed enforcement area, performing, by the controller, an active coasting control for allowing the vehicle to pass through the section speed enforcement area based on a vehicle position at an event occurrence time and based on a remaining section speed enforcement distance, and

wherein the active coasting control includes:

determining, by the controller, the event occurrence time;

determining, by the controller, the vehicle position in relation a start camera position and an end camera position of the section speed enforcement area, wherein the vehicle position is determined to be between the start camera position and the end camera position of the section speed enforcement area;

calculating, by the controller, the remaining section speed enforcement distance between the vehicle position and the end camera position; and

performing, by the controller, an active coasting based on the vehicle position at the event occurrence time and based on the remaining section speed enforcement distance.

2. The method of claim 1 ,

wherein the controller is configured to adjust a vehicle speed based on a hydraulic pressure and a controlled speed.

3. The method of claim 2 , further comprising:

terminating, by the controller, the active coasting when at least one of the start camera and the end camera is no longer detected.

4. The method of claim 2 ,

wherein the active coasting further includes:

determining, by the controller, whether an accelerator is in an ON state;

determining, by the controller, when the accelerator is determined as being in the ON state, whether a current vehicle speed is determined to be greater than the controlled speed;

determining, by the controller, whether the current vehicle speed is less than the controlled speed;

calculating, by the controller, the remaining section speed enforcement distance when the current vehicle speed is determined to be less than the controlled speed; and

performing, by the controller, a section end control when the remaining section speed enforcement distance is less than a predetermined distance, wherein performing the section end control includes:

performing, by the controller, the active coasting;

determining, by the controller, whether the vehicle position is after the end camera position; and

terminating, by the controller, the active coasting when the vehicle position is determined to be after the end camera position.

5. The method of claim 4 , further comprising:

providing, by the controller, a notification to a coasting guidance system when the accelerator is determined as being in an OFF state.

6. The method of claim 5 , further comprising:

determining, by the controller, a motor torque as being the same as a coasting torque when the coasting torque is determined to be less than a motor tolerable maximum torque in; and

calculating, by the controller, the remaining section speed enforcement distance when the current vehicle speed is determined to be less than the controlled speed.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein performing the active coasting further includes:

determining, by the controller, a controlled speed;

determining, by the controller, whether an accelerator is in an ON state;

determining, by the controller, whether a current vehicle speed is greater than the controlled speed when the accelerator is determined as being in the ON state;

providing, by the controller, a notification to a coasting guidance system when the current vehicle speed is determined to be greater than the controlled speed.

8. The method of claim 7 , further comprising:

determining, by the controller, whether the current vehicle speed is greater than the controlled speed when the accelerator is determined as not being in the ON state;

calculating, by the controller, a coasting torque when the current vehicle speed is determined to be greater than the controlled speed;

determining, by the controller, whether the coasting torque is greater than a motor tolerable maximum torque;

calculating, by the controller, a hydraulic torque when the coasting torque is determined to be greater than the motor tolerable maximum torque;

calculating, by the controller, a motor torque;

determining, by the controller, whether the current vehicle speed is less than the controlled speed;

determining, by the controller, whether the vehicle position is after the section speed enforcement area when the current vehicle speed is determined to be less than the controlled speed; and

performing, by the controller, a section end control when the vehicle position is after the section speed enforcement area.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein performing the active coasting further includes:

determining, by the controller, whether the remaining section speed enforcement distance is greater than a predetermined distance; and

performing, by the controller, a coasting control when the remaining section speed enforcement distance is greater than a predetermined distance.

10. The method of claim 8 , wherein performing the section end control further includes:

determining, by the controller, whether the vehicle position is after the end camera position; and

terminating, by the controller, the active coasting when the vehicle position is after the end camera position.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 3, 2018
From: HUH, JEE-WOOK
To: HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY; KIA MOTORS CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 047406/0293 →
Priority Claims (1)
KR 10-2017-0181102 · Dec 27, 2017 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20190193732A1 · Jun 27, 2019