IP Library › Granted Patent US 11,085,988
Granted Patent B2
US 11,085,988 · App. 16/824,565 · Granted Aug 10, 2021

Method for estimating systematic imperfections in medical imaging systems with deep learning

Inventors: Feiyu Chen (Mountain View, CA); Christopher Michael Sandino (Menlo Park, CA); Joseph Yitan Cheng (Santa Clara, CA); John M. Pauly (Stanford, CA); Shreyas S. Vasanawala (Stanford, CA)
Assignee: The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University
G01R33/56554A61B5/055G01R33/4818G01R33/5617G01R33/58G06N3/02
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,085,988
App. No.
16/824,565
Granted
Aug 10, 2021
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) includes steps of acquiring by an MRI scanner undersampled magnetic-field-gradient-encoded k-space data; performing a self-calibration of a magnetic-field-gradient-encoding point-spread function using a first neural network to estimate systematic waveform errors from the k-space data, and computing the magnetic-field-gradient-encoding point-spread function from the systematic waveform errors; reconstructing an image using a second neural network from the magnetic-field-gradient-encoding point-spread function and the k-space data.

Claims (11)

1. A method for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) comprising:

acquiring by an MRI scanner undersampled magnetic-field-gradient-encoded k-space data;

performing a self-calibration of a magnetic-field-gradient-encoding point-spread function using a first neural network to estimate systematic waveform errors from the k-space data, and computing the magnetic-field-gradient-encoding point-spread function from the systematic waveform errors;

reconstructing an image using a second neural network from the magnetic-field-gradient-encoding point-spread function and the k-space data.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the magnetic-field-gradient-encoded k-space data is wave-encoded k-space data.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein the magnetic-field-gradient-encoding point-spread function is a wave-encoding point-spread function.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein acquiring the undersampled magnetic-field-gradient-encoded k-space data comprises using a magnetic-field-gradient-encoded single shot fast spin echo sequence with variable density sampling.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein the systematic waveform errors comprise calibrated gradient time delay and isocenter location shift of magnetic-field-gradient-encoding gradients.

6. The method of claim 5 wherein the systematic waveform errors further comprise a scaling factor defining a ratio of actual and theoretical magnetic-field-gradient-encoding gradient amplitudes.

7. The method of claim 1 wherein performing a self-calibration of the magnetic-field-gradient-encoding point-spread function comprises using the first neural network to estimate systematic waveform errors from the k-space data, a theoretical maximum magnetic-field-gradient-encoding gradient amplitude, and a theoretical isocenter location.

8. The method of claim 1 wherein the second neural network used for reconstructing the image comprises multiple steps, wherein each step comprises a gradient update and a proximal step with a learned regularization network operator with trained parameters.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 30, 2020
From: CHEN, FEIYU; SANDINO, CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL; CHENG, JOSEPH YITAN; PAULY, JOHN M.; VASANAWALA, SHREYAS S.
To: THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY
Reel/Frame 053637/0805 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62820941 · Mar 20, 2019
Related Publication 20200300957A1 · Sep 24, 2020
Cited By (1)
US 12,241,953