Surgical alignment using references
Methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer-readable storage media, for surgical alignment using references. In one general aspect, a method includes coupling a guide to a joint, the guide defining an axis and having an outer contour formed to substantially conform to a portion of the joint. The first reference is attached at a fixed position relative to the joint. A positioning system is used to determine a position of the axis relative to the first reference, where the position of the axis is determined based upon the position of the guide while the guide is coupled to the joint. The guide is removed from the joint, and after the guide is removed from the joint, an instrument is positioned relative to the axis based on a position of a second reference relative to the first reference.
1. A method comprising:
measuring a neck angle of a bone of a joint using a first reference located at a fixed position relative to the bone;
coupling a trial implant to the bone such that a landmark of the trial implant has a defined relationship with a second reference;
after coupling the trial implant to the bone, measuring one or more relative positions between the first reference and the second reference;
determining, based on the measured one or more relative positions and characteristics of the trial implant, a neck angle of the trial implant at the joint;
determining a difference between the neck angle of the trial implant and the neck angle of the bone; and
selecting an implant for implantation at the joint based on the difference between the neck angle of the trial implant and the neck angle of the bone.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein each of the one or more relative positions corresponds to a discrete position along a range of motion of the joint.
3. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining a difference between the neck angle of the trial implant and the neck angle of the bone comprises comparing a range of motion associated with the neck angle of the trial implant to a range of motion associated with the neck angle of the bone.
4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising outputting the difference between the neck angle of the trial implant and the neck angle of the bone to a user.
5. The method of claim 1 , wherein each of the first reference and the second reference comprises one of an electromagnetic sensor, an electromagnetic generator, and a fiducial.
6. A method comprising:
measuring a first joint characteristic for a joint using a first reference located at a fixed position relative to a bone of the joint;
coupling a trial implant to the bone such that a landmark of the trial implant has a defined relationship with a second reference;
after coupling the trial implant to the bone, measuring one or more relative positions between the first reference and the second reference;
determining, based on the measured one or more relative positions and characteristics of the trial implant, a second joint characteristic for the joint;
determining a difference between the second joint characteristic and the first joint characteristic;
calculating, for each of one or more implants, a third joint characteristic for the joint;
determining, for each of the one or more implants, a difference between the third joint characteristic and the first joint characteristic; and
selecting an implant for implantation at the joint from the one or more implants based on (1) the difference between the second joint characteristic and the first joint characteristic, and (2) the difference between the third joint characteristic and the first joint characteristic.
7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the first joint characteristic is associated with a neck of the bone, and the second joint characteristic is associated with a neck of the trial implant.
8. The method of claim 7 , wherein the first joint characteristic is a neck angle of the bone, and the second joint characteristic is a neck angle of the trial implant.
9. The method of claim 6 , wherein the difference between the third joint characteristic and the first joint characteristic for the implant is less than the difference between the second joint characteristic and the first joint characteristic.
10. The method of claim 6 , wherein the third joint characteristic of the implant is substantially equal to the first joint characteristic.
11. The method of claim 6 , wherein for each respective implant of the one or more implants, the third joint characteristic is a neck angle of the respective implant.
12. The method of claim 6 , wherein each of the one or more relative positions corresponds to a discrete position along a range of motion of the joint.
13. The method of claim 6 , wherein determining a difference between the second joint characteristic and the first joint characteristic comprises comparing a range of motion associated with the second joint characteristic to a range of motion associated with the first joint characteristic.
14. The method of claim 6 , wherein selecting an implant comprises identifying a model number or part number associated with the implant.
15. The method of claim 6 , further comprising outputting the difference between the second joint characteristic and the first joint characteristic to a user.
16. The method of claim 6 , wherein each of the first reference and the second reference comprises one of an electromagnetic sensor, an electromagnetic generator, and a fiducial.
17. A method comprising:
measuring a first joint characteristic for a joint using a first reference located at a fixed position relative to a bone of the joint;
coupling a trial implant to the bone such that a landmark of the trial implant has a defined relationship with a second reference;
after coupling the trial implant to the bone, measuring one or more relative positions between the first reference and the second reference;
determining, based on the measured one or more relative positions and characteristics of the trial implant, a second joint characteristic for the joint;
determining a difference between the second joint characteristic and the first joint characteristic;
determining, based on the difference between the second joint characteristic and the first joint characteristic, a desired characteristic of the implant;
comparing the desired characteristic with a corresponding characteristic of each of one or more implants; and
selecting an implant for implantation at the joint from the one or more implants based on the comparison.
18. The method of claim 17 , wherein the first joint characteristic is a neck angle of the bone, and the second joint characteristic is a neck angle of the trial implant.
19. The method of claim 17 , wherein the corresponding characteristic of the implant is substantially equal to the desired characteristic.
20. The method of claim 17 , wherein the desired characteristic is a desired neck angle.
21. The method of claim 17 , wherein for each respective implant of the one or more implants, the corresponding characteristic is a neck angle of the respective implant.