IP Library › Granted Patent US 11,153,144
Granted Patent B2
US 11,153,144 · App. 16/704,962 · Granted Oct 19, 2021

System and method of automated fault correction in a network environment

Inventors: Sreekanth Sreedevi Sasidharan (Trivandrum, IN); Anu Rajagopal (Trivandrum, IN); Shilpa Sasi (Palakkad, IN); Pinky Painadath Jose (Vazhuthacaud, IN); Anoop Pothen Varghese (Glen Waverley, AU); Shankar Kishan Jayakumaran Nair (Thiruvananthapuram, IN)
Assignee: INFOSYS LIMITED
H04L29/14G06F11/079G06F11/0793G06N20/00H04L41/0631H04L41/12
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,153,144
App. No.
16/704,962
Granted
Oct 19, 2021
Kind
B2
Abstract

Automated fault correction in a network environment comprises identifying a pattern in a set of network events and generating a set of substantiating data for the identified patterns. The method can also identify an occurrence probability value for each network event and generate root cause data based on a ranking for the network events using a set of parameters including the occurrence probability. The method can also be directed to performing a regression of the root cause data against a set of historic data and selecting the root cause with a predefined accuracy as an acceptable candidate. The acceptable candidate is then provided for assisted learning for automated fault correction.

Claims (35)

1. A method of automated fault correction in a network environment implemented by at least one computing device, the method comprising:

identifying a pattern in a set of network events;

generating a set of substantiating data for the identified pattern;

determining an occurrence probability value for each network event;

generating root cause data based on a ranking for the network events using a set of parameters including the occurrence probability;

performing an automatically configured regression of the root cause data against a set of historic data comprising historic known root cause scenarios;

selecting a root cause with a predefined accuracy as an acceptable candidate based on the performed regression; and

presenting the acceptable candidate for assisted learning for automated fault correction.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the identifying the pattern further comprises automatically identifying patterns in the set of network events based on topology data, a historical alarm and historical event data.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the set of substantiating data is generated based on topology data and a set of time stamp data.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the historic event data comprises a set of parameters.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the set of parameters include one or more of an occurrence probability rank, severity, chronological order or a topological relationship value.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein the accuracy of the selected root cause is validated based on the historic event data.

7. A system for automated fault correction in a network environment, comprising:

a processor; and

a memory coupled to the processor configured to be capable of executing programmed instructions comprising and stored in the memory to:

identify a pattern in a set of network events;

generate a set of substantiating data for the identified pattern;

identify an occurrence probability value for each network event;

generate root cause data based on a ranking for the network events using a set of parameters including the occurrence probability;

perform an automatically configured regression of the root cause data against a set of historic data comprising historic known root cause scenarios;

select a root cause with a predefined accuracy as an acceptable candidate based on the performed regression; and

present the acceptable candidate for assisted learning for automated fault correction.

8. The system of claim 7 , wherein the identify the pattern further comprises automatically identifying the pattern in the set of network events based on topology data, a historical alarm and historical event data set.

9. The system of claim 7 , wherein the set of substantiating data is generated based on topology data and a set of time stamp data.

10. The system of claim 7 , wherein the historic event data comprises a set of parameters.

11. The system of claim 10 , wherein the set of parameters include one or more of an occurrence probability rank, severity, chronological order or a topological relationship value.

12. A non-transitory computer readable medium having stored thereon instructions for web browser classification comprising executable code that, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to:

identify a pattern in a set of network events;

generate a set of substantiating data for the identified pattern;

identify an occurrence probability value for each network event;

generate root cause data based on a ranking for the network events using a set of parameters including the occurrence probability;

perform an automatically configured regression of the root cause data against a set of historic data comprising historic known root cause scenarios;

select a root cause with a predefined accuracy as an acceptable candidate based on the performed regression; and

present the acceptable candidate for assisted learning for automated fault correction.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 22, 2020
From: SASIDHARAN, SREEKANTH SREEDEVI; RAJAGOPAL, ANU; SASI, SHILPA; JOSE, PINKY PAINADATH; VARGHESE, ANOOP POTHEN; NAIR, SHANKAR KRISHAN JAYAKUMARAN
To: INFOSYS LIMITED
Reel/Frame 051587/0500 →
Priority Claims (1)
IN 201841046227 · Dec 6, 2018 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20200204428A1 · Jun 25, 2020
Cited By (1)
US 12,640,993