IP Library › Granted Patent US 11,200,796
Granted Patent B2
US 11,200,796 · App. 17/062,961 · Granted Dec 14, 2021

Automated highway system (AHS)

Inventor: Edward D. Ioli (Los Angeles, CA)
Assignee: EDWARD D. IOLI TRUST
G08G1/012G08G1/005G08G1/0116G08G1/0125G08G1/0145G08G1/091G08G1/096725G08G1/096741G08G1/096775H04W4/44G08G1/095G08G1/0967H04L67/12
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,200,796
App. No.
17/062,961
Granted
Dec 14, 2021
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system and method for controlling vehicles and for providing assistance to operated vehicles is discussed and described herein.

Claims (26)

1. A machine-implemented method of controlling vehicle positioning comprising:

determining a lateral position and a longitudinal position of a vehicle in a lane by a processor;

generating a coordinate checking signal as a function of the lateral position and the longitudinal position of the vehicle in the lane;

determining if the vehicle is currently in substantial compliance with the coordinate checking signal;

if the vehicle is not currently in substantial compliance with the coordinate checking signal, automatically adjusting a control of the vehicle to bring the vehicle into compliance with the coordinate checking signal; and

determining whether another vehicle is in compliance with a respective coordinate checking signal.

2. The method of claim 1 further comprising determining whether it is safe to adjust the control of the vehicle prior to adjusting the control of the vehicle using an automated highway monitoring system that is external to the vehicle.

3. The method of claim 2 further comprising determining whether it is safe to adjust the control of the vehicle prior to adjusting the control of the vehicle.

4. The method of claim 1 further comprising determining whether another vehicle is too close to the vehicle to safely allow the vehicle to come into compliance with the coordinate checking signal using a signal received from an automated highway monitoring system that is external to the vehicle.

5. The method of claim 1 further comprising determining whether onboard systems of the vehicle are responding to commands using an automated highway monitoring system that is external to the vehicle.

6. The method of claim 1 further comprising automatically adjusting a steering control of the vehicle.

7. The method of claim 1 further comprising using a vehicle transponder to determine the lateral position and the longitudinal position of the vehicle in the lane.

8. The method of claim 1 further comprising generating a user interface display for a driver as a function of the coordinate checking signal.

9. A vehicle control system comprising:

a processor-implemented system configured to determine a lateral position and a longitudinal position of a vehicle in a lane;

the processor-implemented system configured to generate a coordinate checking signal as a function of the lateral position and the longitudinal position of the vehicle in the lane;

the processor-implemented system configured to determine if the vehicle is currently in substantial compliance with the coordinate checking signal;

the processor-implemented system configured to automatically adjust a control of the vehicle to bring the vehicle into compliance with the coordinate checking signal if the vehicle is not currently in substantial compliance with the coordinate checking signal; and

the processor-implemented system configured to determine whether it is safe to adjust the control of the vehicle prior to adjusting the control of the vehicle.

10. The vehicle control system of claim 9 further comprising the processor-implemented system configured to determine whether it is safe to adjust a speed of the vehicle prior to adjusting the speed of the vehicle.

11. The vehicle control system of claim 9 further comprising the processor-implemented system configured to determine whether another vehicle is too close to the vehicle to safely allow the vehicle to come into compliance with the coordinate checking signal.

12. The vehicle control system of claim 9 further comprising the processor-implemented system configured to determine whether another vehicle is in compliance with a respective coordinate checking signal.

13. The vehicle control system of claim 9 further comprising the processor-implemented system configured to determine whether onboard systems of the vehicle are responding to commands.

14. The vehicle control system of claim 9 further comprising the processor-implemented system configured to automatically adjust a steering control of the vehicle.

15. The vehicle control system of claim 9 further comprising the processor-implemented system configured to use a vehicle transponder to determine the lateral position and the longitudinal position of the vehicle in the lane.

16. The vehicle control system of claim 9 further comprising the processor-implemented system configured to generate a user interface display for a driver as a function of the coordinate checking signal.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 18, 2022
From: EDWARD D. IOLI TRUST
To: EDI LICENSING LLC
Reel/Frame 060844/0762 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 19, 2022
From: EDI LICENSING, LLC
To: EDWARD D. IOLI TRUST
Reel/Frame 060551/0048 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 5, 2020
From: IOLI, EDWARD D.
To: EDWARD D. IOLI TRUST
Reel/Frame 053973/0460 →
Continuity (7)
Continuation 16416959 · May 20, 2019
Continuation 16036025 · Jul 16, 2018
Continuation 15261091 · Sep 9, 2016
Continuation In Part 15091474 · Apr 5, 2016
Provisional Application 62252261 · Nov 6, 2015
Provisional Application 62272010 · Dec 28, 2015
Related Publication 20210020030A1 · Jan 21, 2021