IP Library Granted Patent US 11,208,884
Granted Patent B2
US 11,208,884 · App. 15/318,322 · Granted Dec 28, 2021

Acoustic array signal processing for flow detection

Inventors: Yinghui Lu (The Woodlands, TX); Avinash Vinayak Taware (The Woodlands, TX); Paris Smaragdis (Urbana, IL); Nam Nguyen (Singapore, SG); David Alan Welsh (League City, TX); Clifford Lloyd Macklin (Katy, TX); Daniel Viassolo (Katy, TX)
Assignee: Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.
E21B47/101G01V1/40G01H17/00
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,208,884
App. No.
15/318,322
Granted
Dec 28, 2021
Kind
B2
Abstract

Disclosed are tools, systems, and methods for detecting one or more underground acoustic sources and localizing them in depth and radial distance from a wellbore, for example, for the purpose of finding underground fluid flows, such as may result from leaks in the well barriers. In various embodiments, acoustic-source detection and localization are accomplished with an array of at least three acoustic sensors disposed in the wellbore, in conjunction with array signal processing.

Claims (25)

1. A method, comprising:

substantially simultaneously measuring acoustic signals with each of at least three sensors disposed in an array within a wellbore;

using an array-processing technique to compute, from the measured acoustic signals, a fused-signal parameter as a function of depth and radial distance from the wellbore; and

determining a depth and radial distance from the wellbore of an acoustic source based on a local maximum of the fused-signal parameter.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising using a binary hypothesis test applied to the local maximum of the fused-signal parameter to determine whether the acoustic source corresponds to an underground flow.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the binary hypothesis test comprises a comparison of the local maximum against a detection threshold, flow being detected based on the local maximum of the fused-signal parameter exceeding the detection threshold, the threshold being based on empirical data for a plurality of flow and non-flow scenarios.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the empirical data comprises fused-signal data derived from logging data for confirmed flow cases as well as in the absence of flow conditions.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein creating the forward model comprises modifying a free-space steering vector to account for non-uniformities in the configuration of the wellbore and surrounding formation.

6. The method of claim 4 , wherein creating the forward model comprises modifying a free-space steering vector to account for the acoustic source being a near-field source.

7. The system of claim 6 , wherein the binary hypothesis test comprises a comparison of the local maximum against a detection threshold, the data-processing facility to detect flow based on the local maximum of the fused-signal parameter exceeding the detection threshold, the threshold being based on empirical data for a plurality of flow and non-flow scenarios.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the detection threshold is derived from the empirical data bases on one or statistical metrics comprising at least one of a sensitivity, a false-alarm rate, or a false-negatives rate.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the non-uniformities comprise at least one of multiple barriers to fluid flow or multiple media between the acoustic source and the sensors.

10. The system of claim 9 , wherein the data-processing facility is further to use a binary hypothesis test applied to the local maximum of the fused-signal parameter to determine whether the acoustic source corresponds to an underground flow.

11. The system of claim 9 , wherein the data-processing facility, in computing the fused-signal parameter, is to create a forward model of acoustic wave propagation based at least in part on a configuration of the wellbore and surrounding formation, the configuration being modelled as non-uniform.

12. The system of claim 9 , wherein the acoustic sensors comprise omnidirectional hydrophones, FBG sensors, or fiber-optic cables.

13. The system of claim 9 , wherein the acoustic sensors form a linear array disposed along a longitudinal axis of the wellbore.

14. The method of claim 1 , wherein computing the fused-signal parameter comprises creating a forward model of acoustic wave propagation based at least in part on a configuration of the wellbore and surrounding formation, the configuration being modelled as non-uniform.

15. A system comprising:

a sensor array disposed within a wellbore, comprising at least three acoustic sensors for substantially simultaneously measuring acoustic signals received thereat; and

a data-processing facility to use an array-processing technique to compute, from the measured acoustic signals, a fused-signal parameter as a function of depth and radial distance from the wellbore compute, and to determine a depth and radial distance from the wellbore of an acoustic source based on a local maximum of the fused-signal parameter.

16. The system of claim 15 , wherein the empirical data comprises fused-signal data derived from logging data for confirmed flow cases as well as in the absence of flow conditions.

17. The system of claim 16 , wherein the data-processing facility, in creating the forward model, is to modify a free-space steering vector to account for non-uniformities in the configuration of the wellbore and surrounding formation.

18. The system of claim 15 , wherein the data-processing facility is to derive the detection threshold from the empirical data bases on one or statistical metrics comprising at least one of a sensitivity, a false-alarm rate, or a false-negatives rate.

19. The system of claim 18 , wherein the non-uniformities comprise at least one of multiple barriers to fluid flow or multiple media between the acoustic source and the sensors.

20. The system of claim 18 , wherein the data-processing facility, in creating the forward model, is to modify a free-space steering vector to account for the acoustic source being a near-field source.

Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62103006 · Jan 13, 2015
Related Publication 20170321540A1 · Nov 9, 2017