IP Library › Granted Patent US 11,261,726
Granted Patent B2
US 11,261,726 · App. 15/441,863 · Granted Mar 1, 2022

Safety integrity level (SIL) 3 high-integrity protection system (HIPS) fully-functional test configuration for hydrocarbon (gas) production systems

Inventors: Pedro Alejandro Mujica (Damman, SA); Kiran Patel (Al Khobar, SA); Chan Eldon Miller (Dhahran, SA); Herman Roberto Cipriano (Al Khobar, SA)
Assignee: Saudi Arabian Oil Company
E21B47/06E21B34/16E21B41/0021E21B47/117G01V11/002E21B33/03
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,261,726
App. No.
15/441,863
Granted
Mar 1, 2022
Kind
B2
Abstract

A selection of a hydrocarbon well of a hydrocarbon production system is received at a safety logic solver (SLS) for proof testing. Test mode pressure sensors attached to a common header of the hydrocarbon production system are activated to monitor a live process condition status of the common header from all wells of the hydrocarbon production system. A simulated overpressure condition is induced in the operation pressure sensors. An indication of overpressure is received at the SLS from at least two operation pressure sensors. Final elements associated with the hydrocarbon well are signaled to close while leaving other wells in the hydrocarbon production system in operation. The operation pressure sensors are restored to a normal pressure condition, and the final elements associated with the selected hydrocarbon well are signaled to re-open the hydrocarbon well.

Claims (29)

1. A computer-implemented method, comprising:

receiving a selection of a hydrocarbon well of a hydrocarbon production system at a safety logic solver (SLS) for proof testing;

activating test mode pressure sensors attached to a common header of the hydrocarbon production system to monitor a live process condition status of the common header from all wells of the hydrocarbon production system;

inducing a simulated overpressure condition in operation pressure sensors;

receiving an indication of overpressure at the SLS from at least two operation pressure sensors;

signaling final elements associated with the hydrocarbon well to close while leaving other wells in the hydrocarbon production system in production operation;

in response to determining that the hydrocarbon well is fully closed and that the test mode pressure sensors are healthy, restoring the operation pressure sensors to a normal pressure condition while keeping the other wells in the hydrocarbon production system in production operation; and

signaling the final elements associated with the selected hydrocarbon well to re-open the hydrocarbon well.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the proof testing is a fully-functional test of a safety instrumented function, pressure sensors, the SLS, and final elements associated with the hydrocarbon production system.

3. A non-transitory, computer-readable medium storing one or more instructions executable by a computer system to perform operations comprising:

receiving a selection of a hydrocarbon well of a hydrocarbon production system at a safety logic solver (SLS) for proof testing;

activating test mode pressure sensors attached to a common header of the hydrocarbon production system to monitor a live process condition status of the common header from all wells of the hydrocarbon production system;

inducing a simulated overpressure condition in operation pressure sensors;

receiving an indication of overpressure at the SLS from at least two operation pressure sensors;

signaling final elements associated with the hydrocarbon well to close while leaving other wells in the hydrocarbon production system in production operation;

in response to determining that the hydrocarbon well is fully closed and that the test mode pressure sensors are healthy, restoring the operation pressure sensors to a normal pressure condition while keeping the other wells in the hydrocarbon production system in production operation; and

signaling the final elements associated with the selected hydrocarbon well to re-open the hydrocarbon well.

4. The non-transitory, computer-readable medium of claim 3 , wherein the proof testing is a fully-functional test of a safety instrumented function, pressure sensors, the SLS, and final elements associated with the hydrocarbon production system.

5. A computer-implemented system, comprising:

a computer memory; and

a hardware processor interoperably coupled with the computer memory and configured to perform operations comprising:

receiving a selection of a hydrocarbon well of a hydrocarbon production system at a safety logic solver (SLS) for proof testing;

activating test mode pressure sensors attached to a common header of the hydrocarbon production system to monitor a live process condition status of the common header from all wells of the hydrocarbon production system;

inducing a simulated overpressure condition in operation pressure sensors;

receiving an indication of overpressure at the SLS from at least two operation pressure sensors;

signaling final elements associated with the hydrocarbon well to close while leaving other wells in the hydrocarbon production system in production operation;

in response to determining that the hydrocarbon well is fully closed and that the test mode pressure sensors are healthy, restoring the operation pressure sensors to a normal pressure condition while keeping the other wells in the hydrocarbon production system in production operation; and

signaling the final elements associated with the selected hydrocarbon well to re-open the hydrocarbon well.

6. The computer-implemented system of claim 5 , wherein the proof testing is a fully-functional test of a safety instrumented function, pressure sensors, the SLS, and final elements associated with the hydrocarbon production system.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 20, 2018
From: MUJICA, PEDRO ALEJANDRO; PATEL, KIRAN; MILLER, CHAN ELDON; CIPRIANO, HERMAN ROBERTO
To: SAUDI ARABIAN OIL COMPANY
Reel/Frame 044971/0937 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20180245452A1 · Aug 30, 2018
Cited By (1)
US 12,359,557