IP Library › Granted Patent US 11,270,325
Granted Patent B2
US 11,270,325 · App. 16/216,997 · Granted Mar 8, 2022

Systems and methods for collaborative offer generation

Inventors: Tony Ventrice (Palo Alto, CA); Michael Montero (Palo Alto, CA); Jamie Rapperport (Palo Alto, CA)
Assignee: Eversight, Inc.
G06Q30/0206G06Q30/0211G06Q30/0255G06Q30/0271
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,270,325
App. No.
16/216,997
Granted
Mar 8, 2022
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and methods for a collaborative offer portal is provided. A proposed offer is received from a manufacturer, including an offer structure and a number of consumers they wish to target. Transaction logs of a retailer are accessed to determine an audience for the offer by calculating a return on investment (ROI) for the customer base using the retailer's records given the offer type. The consumers are then grouped by their ROI distribution, and the ROI for the deal is calculated based upon the offer size in light of this distribution. From the offer ROI a discount percentage to be paid by the retailer versus the merchant can be created. The retailer may then choose to accept the offer for deployment.

Claims (22)

1. A computer implemented method for a collaborative offer portal comprising:

receiving a proposed offer from a manufacturer, wherein the proposed offer includes a number of consumers to target, a product, and an offer structure;

accessing transaction logs for a retailer;

receiving a set of weights from the retailer;

calculating a return on investment (ROI) value for each consumer by multiplying the set of weights to a set of the metrics and then combining the resulting weighted metrics by multiplication or normalized addition, wherein the first of the three metrics is a measure if a given consumer has purchased the product in the past, the second of the three metrics is a calculation of price elasticity for the given consumer for the product, and the third of the three metrics is a measure of purchase frequency of the product by the given consumer;

grouping the consumers into equal sized buckets by ROI value to generate an ROI distribution;

selecting a plurality of buckets in the ROI distribution which are largest based upon the number of consumers to target;

calculating an average ROI value for the offers in the selected plurality of buckets.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising calculating a cost for a manufacturer based upon the offer structure, number of consumers to target, and the discount percentage.

3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising calculating a predicted redemption rate for the offer, predicted sales responsive to the predicted redemption rate, predicted incremental sales, and gross margin estimates.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the discount percentage is linearly correlated to the average ROI value.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the discount variable value is constrained such that the value deviates less than 10% from a value of the proposed offer.

6. A collaborative offer portal system comprising:

a web-based server for receiving a proposed offer from a manufacturer, wherein the proposed offer includes a number of consumers to target, a product, and an offer structure, and for receiving a set of weights from the retailer;

a database for accessing transaction logs for a retailer; and

a processor for calculating a return on investment (ROI) value for each consumer by multiplying the set of weights to a set of the metrics and then combining the resulting weighted metrics by multiplication or normalized addition, wherein the first of the three metrics is a measure if a given consumer has purchased the product in the past, the second of the three metrics is a calculation of price elasticity for the given consumer for the product, and the third of the three metrics is a measure of purchase frequency of the product by the given consumer, and grouping the consumers into equal sized buckets by ROI value to generate an ROI distribution,

selecting a plurality of buckets in the ROI distribution which are largest based upon the number of consumers to target,

calculating an average ROI value for the offers in the selected plurality of buckets.

7. The system of claim 6 , wherein the processor is further for calculating a cost for a manufacturer based upon the offer structure, number of consumers to target, and the discount percentage.

8. The system of claim 6 , wherein the processor is further for calculating a predicted redemption rate for the offer, predicted sales responsive to the predicted redemption rate, predicted incremental sales, and gross margin estimates.

9. The system of claim 6 , wherein the discount percentage is linearly correlated to the average ROI value.

10. The system of claim 6 , wherein the discount variable value is constrained such that the value deviates less than 10% from a value of the proposed offer.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 3, 2023
From: EVERSIGHT, INC.
To: MAPLEBEAR INC. (DBA INSTACART)
Reel/Frame 063529/0881 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 11, 2019
From: VENTRICE, TONY; MONTERO, MICHAEL; RAPPERPORT, JAMIE
To: EVERSIGHT, INC.
Reel/Frame 048566/0509 →
Continuity (7)
Continuation In Part 16120178 · Aug 31, 2018
Continuation 15990005 · May 25, 2018
Continuation In Part 14209851 · Mar 13, 2014
Provisional Application 62576742 · Oct 25, 2017
Provisional Application 62553133 · Sep 1, 2017
Provisional Application 61780630 · Mar 13, 2013
Related Publication 20190180302A1 · Jun 13, 2019