IP Library Granted Patent US 11,316,728
Granted Patent B2
US 11,316,728 · App. 17/105,544 · Granted Apr 26, 2022

Method and system for assessing network resource failures using passive shared risk resource groups

Inventor: Ornan Alexander Gerstel (Tel Aviv, IL)
Assignee: SEDONASYS SYSTEMS LTD
H04L41/0654G06F11/079H04L41/0677H04L43/0811H04L43/0823H04L45/22
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,316,728
App. No.
17/105,544
Granted
Apr 26, 2022
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for analyzing failures in network resources in a multilayered communication network using passive shared risk resource groups may include, in a processor, identifying network resources in a plurality of network resources having common risk attributes. The network resources may be grouped into one or more passive shared risk resource groups (PSRG) based on the common risk attributes. A likelihood of a PSRG failure may be assessed for each of the one or more PSRGs.

Claims (36)

1. A method for assessing failures in network resources in a multilayered communication network, the method comprising:

in a processor, receiving indications of failures in one or more network resources from a plurality of network resources in a communication network comprising a plurality of network layers;

assessing the failures in the one or more failed network resources in each of progressively lower network layers from a highest network layer to a lowest network layer in said plurality of network layers, or in each of progressively higher network layers from the lowest network layer to the highest network layer in said plurality of network layers;

identifying a set of failed network resources from the one or more failed network resources in the progressively lower network layers causing failures in network layers above the progressively higher network layers, or from the one or more failed network resources in the progressively higher network layers causing failures in network layers below the progressively higher network layers;

determining that the set of failed network resources do not account for all failures in the one or more failed network resources;

identifying a group of network resources having a common risk attribute, wherein at least one failed network resource of the set of failed network resources has the common risk attribute; and

identifying, from the group of network resources, another failed network resource.

2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein identifying the set comprises identifying root causes of the failures in the communication network.

3. The method according to claim 1 , wherein receiving the indications of failures is performed at least partly in response to polling at least one of the plurality of network resources.

4. The method according to claim 1 , wherein identifying the set of failed network resources comprises identifying a minimal set of failed network resources causing all the failures in the communication network.

5. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the highest network layer and the lowest network layer comprise an internet protocol (IP) layer and a wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) layer respectively.

6. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising arranging the failures according to each network layer in said plurality of network layers.

7. The method according to claim 1 , wherein assessing the failures comprises

skipping network layers from which no failure indications are received.

8. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising if upon receiving no failure indications from said plurality of network layers in the communication network, deducing a suspected set of network resources from said plurality of network resources in said plurality of network layers that cause the failures in the communication network.

9. The method according to claim 8 , further comprising sending requests to the network resources in the suspected set to report their failure.

10. The method according to claim 9 , further comprising updating a database with the reported failures of the network resources in the suspected set.

11. The method according to claim 8 , further comprising automatically routing data traffic around the network resources in the suspected set.

12. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the group of network resources comprises a passive shared risk resource group (PSRG), further comprising:

assessing a likelihood of a PSRG failure for the PSRG.

13. The method according to claim 12 , further comprising outputting the set of failed network resources or the likelihood of the PSRG failure for the PSRG.

14. An apparatus for assessing failures in network resources in a multilayered communication network the apparatus comprising:

a memory; and

a processor configured to:

receive indications of failures in one or more network resources from a plurality of network resources in a communication network comprising a plurality of network layers;

assess the failures in the one or more failed network resources in each of progressively lower network layers from a highest network layer to a lowest network layer in said plurality of network layers, or in each of progressively higher network layers from the lowest network layer to the highest network layer in said plurality of network layers;

identify a set of failed network resources from the one or more failed network resources in the progressively lower network layers causing failures in network layers above the progressively higher network layers, or from the one or more failed network resources in the progressively higher network layers causing failures in network layers below the progressively higher network layers;

determine that the set of failed network resources do not account for all failures in the one or more failed network resources;

identify a group of network resources having a common risk attribute, wherein at least one failed network resource of the set of failed network resources has the common risk attribute; and

identify, from the group of network resources, another failed network resource.

15. The apparatus according to claim 14 , wherein the processor is configured to identify the set by identifying root causes of the failures in the communication network.

16. The apparatus according to claim 14 , wherein the processor is configured to receive the indications of failures by receiving the failure indications in response to polling at least one of said plurality of network resources.

17. The apparatus according to claim 14 , wherein the processor is configured to identify the set of failed network resources by identifying a minimal set of failed network resources causing all the failures in the communication network.

18. The apparatus according to claim 14 , wherein the highest network layer and the lowest network layer comprise an internet protocol (IP) layer and a wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) layer respectively.

19. The apparatus according to claim 14 , wherein the processor is configured to arrange the failures according to each network layer in said plurality of network layers.

20. The apparatus according to claim 14 , wherein the processor is configured to assess the failures by skipping network layers from which no failure indications are received.

Assignments (4)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 31, 2023
From: SEDONASYS SYSTEMS LTD.
To: CISCO TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Reel/Frame 064433/0970 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 8, 2021
From: COMERICA BANK
To: SEDONASYS SYSTEMS LTD
Reel/Frame 057408/0052 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Feb 3, 2021
From: SEDONASYS SYSTEMS LTD
To: COMERICA BANK
Reel/Frame 055131/0845 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 26, 2020
From: GERSTEL, ORNAN ALEXANDER
To: SEDONASYS SYSTEMS LTD
Reel/Frame 054527/0906 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 17059225
Provisional Application 62677015 · May 27, 2018
Related Publication 20210105173A1 · Apr 8, 2021
Cited By (1)
US 12,665,817