IP Library Granted Patent US 11,330,982
Granted Patent B2
US 11,330,982 · App. 16/843,970 · Granted May 17, 2022

Systems and methods for real-time target validation for image-guided radiation therapy

Inventors: John Rodenbeck Adler, Jr. (Stanford, CA); Jianing Shi (Houston, TX); James E. Clayton (San Jose, CA)
Assignee: VARIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
A61B5/0036A61B6/12A61B6/463A61B6/466A61N5/107A61N5/1049A61N5/1064A61N5/1067A61B6/025A61N2005/1062
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,330,982
App. No.
16/843,970
Granted
May 17, 2022
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and methods for real-time target validation during radiation treatment therapy based on real-time target displacement and radiation dosimetry measurements.

Claims (53)

1. A method for real-time validation of a radiation treatment session, comprising:

obtaining images of a target under treatment;

comparing, over a series of projection angles, the obtained images with corresponding reference images; and

evaluating whether there is a change in a parameter of the treatment session by:

determining a first difference between the compared images at a first projection angle;

determining a second difference between the compared images at a second, subsequent projection angle;

computing the difference between the first and second differences; and

comparing the computed difference with a predetermine threshold,

wherein a computed difference above the predetermined threshold indicates a change in one or more treatment parameters.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the treatment parameters include target spatial position, target orientation, target volume position, beam trajectory through the target, and radiation dose.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein a change in the treatment parameter indicates one or more of target displacement and radiation dose delivery error.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the evaluating includes evaluating a similarity between a beam trajectory in a 3D target volume reconstructed from the obtained images and a 3D target volume reconstructed from the reference images.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the 3D reconstructing includes using a compressive sensing computation algorithm.

6. The method of claim 5 , further comprising validating spatial position and orientation of the target volume based on the reconstructed 3D target volumes.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the reconstructing is in real-time.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the evaluating includes evaluating, in real-time, a similarity between the total radiation dose in a target volume determined from the obtained images and the total radiation dose in the target volume determined from the reference images.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the comparing and evaluating are continually performed during the treatment session.

10. The method of claim 1 , further comprising generating a feedback signal upon indication of a change in one or more parameters.

11. The method of claim 10 , further comprising applying an adjustment in the treatment session in response to the feedback signal.

12. A system for real-time validation of a radiation treatment session, comprising:

an imaging device to generate a series of images of a target volume exposed to radiation; and

a computer processing system configured to:

obtain the series of images;

compare, over a series of projection angles, the obtained images with corresponding reference images; and

evaluate whether there is a change in a parameter of the treatment session by:

determining a first difference between the compared images at a first projection angle;

determining a second difference between the compared images at a second, subsequent projection angle;

computing the difference between the first and second differences; and

comparing the computed difference with a predetermine threshold,

wherein a computed difference above the predetermined threshold indicates a change in one or more treatment parameters.

13. The system of claim 12 ,

wherein the treatment parameters include target spatial position, target orientation, target volume position, beam trajectory through the target, and radiation dose, and

wherein a change in the treatment parameter indicates one or more of target displacement and radiation dose delivery error.

14. The system of claim 12 ,

wherein the evaluating includes evaluating a similarity between a beam trajectory in a 3D target volume reconstructed from the obtained images and a 3D target volume reconstructed from the reference images, the 3D reconstructing including using a compressive sensing computation algorithm,

wherein the reconstructing is in real-time, and

wherein the system further comprises validating spatial position and orientation of the target volume based on the reconstructed 3D target volumes.

15. The system of claim 12 , wherein the evaluating includes evaluating, in real-time, a similarity between the total radiation dose in a target volume determined from the obtained images and the total radiation dose in the target volume determined from the reference images.

16. The system of claim 12 , wherein the computer processing system is further configured to generate a feedback signal upon indication of a change in one or more parameters, and apply an adjustment in the treatment session in response to the feedback signal.

17. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium upon which is embodied a sequence of programmed instructions which when executed by a computer processing system causes the computer processing system to:

obtain a series of images of a target volume;

compare, over a series of projection angles, the obtained images with corresponding reference images; and

evaluate whether there is a change in a parameter of the treatment session by:

determining a first difference between the compared images at a first projection angle;

determining a second difference between the compared images at a second, subsequent projection angle;

computing the difference between the first and second differences; and

comparing the computed difference with a predetermine threshold,

wherein a computed difference above the predetermined threshold indicates a change in one or more treatment parameters.

18. The computer-readable medium of claim 17 , further causing the computer processing system to:

evaluate a similarity between a beam trajectory in a 3D target volume reconstructed from the obtained images and a 3D target volume reconstructed from the reference images, the 3D reconstructing including using a compressive sensing computation algorithm, wherein the reconstructing is in real-time; and

validate spatial position and orientation of the target volume based on the reconstructed 3D target volumes.

19. The computer-readable medium of claim 17 , further causing the computer processing system to evaluate, in real-time, a similarity between the total radiation dose in a target volume determined from the obtained images and the total radiation dose in the target volume determined from the reference images.

20. The computer-readable medium of claim 17 , further causing the computer processing system to generate a feedback signal upon indication of a change in one or more parameters, and apply an adjustment in the treatment session in response to the feedback signal.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 8, 2023
From: ADLER, JOHN RODENBECK; SHI, JIANING; CLAYTON, JAMES E.
To: VARIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
Reel/Frame 062621/0811 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 15066050 · Mar 10, 2016
Continuation 13691502 · Nov 30, 2012
Provisional Application 61565900 · Dec 1, 2011
Related Publication 20200237226A1 · Jul 30, 2020
Cited By (2)
US 12,392,884 US 12,399,266