Systems and methods of automated biometric identification reporting

1. A method of generating reporting data relating to an identification match relating to a probe image, the method comprising:

automatically capturing a comparison area in the probe image and a comparison area of a candidate image based on examiner input;

facilitating a determination of whether a similarity or a dissimilarity exists between the comparison area in the probe image and the comparison area of the candidate image;

automatically recording metadata based on the determination of whether the similarity or the dissimilarity exists between the comparison area in the probe image and the comparison area of the candidate image and updating an audit log; and

generating a report comprising the metadata.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising, prior to generating the report:

automatically capturing a second comparison area in the probe image and a second comparison area of the candidate image based on examiner input;

facilitating a determination of whether a second similarity or a second dissimilarity exists between the second comparison area in the probe image and the second comparison area of the candidate image; and

automatically recording metadata based on the determination of whether the similarity or the dissimilarity exists between the second comparison area in the probe image and the second comparison area of the candidate image and updating the audit log.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the steps of capturing a second comparison area and facilitating whether a second similarity or dissimilarity exists repeats until a user determines the report should be finalized.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the report is displayed on a user interface.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the probe image comprises one or more of a fingerprint image, an interdigital image, a palm image, a writer's palm image, a footprint image, and an image of a ridge flow.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the comparison area comprises a point of minutiae in the probe image.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the report is configured to be presented in a courtroom.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the report is configured to be presented to a second examiner for verification of the decision.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the metadata comprises data associated with a decision process of a fingerprint examiner.

10. A non-transitory computer readable information storage media having stored thereon instructions that, when executed by one or more processors, cause to be performed a method comprising:

automatically capturing a comparison area in a probe image and a comparison area of a candidate image;

facilitating a determination of whether a similarity or a dissimilarity exists between the comparison area in the probe image and the comparison area of the candidate image;

automatically recording metadata based on the determination of whether the similarity or the dissimilarity exists between the comparison area in the probe image and the comparison area of the candidate image and updating an audit log; and

generating a report comprising the metadata.

11. The media of claim 10 , wherein the method further comprises, prior to generating the report:

automatically capturing a second comparison area in the probe image and a second comparison area of the candidate image;

facilitating a determination of whether a second similarity or a second dissimilarity exists between the second comparison area in the probe image and the second comparison area of the candidate image; and

automatically recording metadata based on the determination of whether the similarity or the dissimilarity exists between the second comparison area in the probe image and the second comparison area of the candidate image and updating the audit log.

12. The media of claim 11 , wherein the steps of capturing a second comparison area and facilitating whether a second similarity or dissimilarity exists repeats until a user determines the report should be finalized.

13. The media of claim 10 , wherein the report is displayed on a user interface.

14. The media of claim 10 , wherein the probe image comprises one or more of a fingerprint image, an interdigital image, a palm image, a writer's palm image, a footprint image, and an image of a ridge flow.

15. The media of claim 10 , wherein the comparison area comprises a point of minutiae in the probe image.

16. The media of claim 10 , wherein the report is configured to be presented in a courtroom.

17. The media of claim 10 , wherein the report is configured to be presented to an examiner for verification of the determination.

18. The media of claim 10 , wherein the metadata comprises data associated with a decision process of a fingerprint examiner.

19. A computing system in communication with a database containing gallery images, the computing system comprising:

non-transitory computer-readable memory storing computer-readable program code; and

a processor that, in response to executing the computer-readable program code stored in the memory:

automatically captures a comparison area in a probe image and a comparison area of a candidate image;

facilitates a determination of whether a similarity or a dissimilarity exists between the comparison area in the probe image and the comparison area of the candidate image;

automatically records metadata based on the determination of whether the similarity or the dissimilarity exists between the comparison area in the probe image and the comparison area of the candidate image and updating an audit log; and

generates a report comprising the metadata.

20. The computer system of claim 19 , wherein the processor further, prior to generating the report,

automatically captures a second comparison area in the probe image and a second comparison area of the candidate image;

facilitates whether a second similarity or a second dissimilarity exists between the second comparison area in the probe image and the second comparison area of the candidate image; and

automatically records metadata based on the determination of whether the similarity or the dissimilarity exists between the second comparison area in the probe image and the second comparison area of the candidate image and updating the audit log.