Synergistic DNS security update
Systems and methods provide for synergistic domain name system DNS security updates for an enterprise network operating under a Software Defined Wide Area Network (SD-WAN). A system may be configured to collect positive and/or negative unified threat defense (UTD) results, deploy a rules-based model that, when a threat or clearance is detected across several SD-WAN edge network devices, triggers an update to a local security blacklist/whitelist, wherein the update comprises a signature, and push the update to other devices that have not yet seen the threat or clearance.
1. A computer-implemented method comprising:
receiving, via a network controller appliance of a software-defined wide-area network (SD-WAN), an upstream update from an edge network device that comprises a threat signature associated with a threat detected by the edge network device, wherein the upstream update is received as part of a stream of negative unified threat defense (UTD) results;
triggering a temporary update to add the detected threat as a negative UTD result in a local domain name system (DNS) blacklist including the UTD results received as part of the stream of negative UTD results;
pushing a downstream update that comprises the threat signature to a device group comprising other edge network devices that have not seen the threat; and
sending a DNS blacklist that is associated with the stream of negative UTD results and generated from the local DNS blacklist to an associated cloud security system.
2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:
deploying a rules-based model that the temporary update is triggered to add the detected threat to the local DNS blacklist when the threat is detected across several edge network devices.
3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the detected threat is detected by a locally-implemented advanced security policy on the edge network device and was not detected by an associated cloud security system having a domain name system security platform.
4. The computer-implemented method of claim 3 , wherein the locally-implemented advanced security policy is one of the following policies: Unified Threat Defense (UTD), IPSec/SSL Intrusion Detection and Prevention System (IPS/IDS), Advanced Malware Protection (AMP), Anti-virus Protection (AV), Data Loss Prevention (DLP), Application Firewall (AppFW), or Encrypted Traffic Analytics (ETA).
5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the other edge network devices are associated with a partner virtual private network (“VPN”) of the edge network device.
6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 ,
wherein the DNS backlist is pre-processed and condensed.
7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the upstream and downstream updates are new message types in an address family in Overlay Management Protocol (OMP) messages.
8. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the device group is limited to other edge network devices in the SD-WAN that do not have locally-implemented advanced security policies enabled.
9. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the threat signature comprises protocol header fields including an Internet Protocol (IP) address, port, protocols, and other attributes including packet length.
10. A system, comprising:
one or more processors; and
one or more non-transitory computer-readable media that include computer-readable instructions stored thereon that are executable by the one or more processors to perform or control performance of operations, the operations comprising:
receive, via a network controller appliance of a software-defined wide-area network, an upstream update from an edge network device that comprises a threat signature associated with a threat detected by the edge network device, wherein the upstream update is received as part of a stream of negative unified threat defense (UTD) results;
trigger a temporary update to add the detected threat as a negative UTD result in a local domain name system (DNS) blacklist including the UTD results received as part of the stream of negative UTD results;
push a downstream update that comprises the threat signature to other edge network devices that have not seen the threat; and
send a DNS blacklist that is associated with the stream of negative UTD results and generated from the local DNS blacklist to an associated cloud security system.
11. The system of claim 10 , the operations further comprising:
deploy a rules-based model that only when the threat is detected across several edge network devices is the temporary update triggered to add the detected threat to the local DNS blacklist.
12. The system of claim 10 , wherein the detected threat was detected by a locally-implemented advanced security policy on the edge network device and was not detected by an associated cloud security system having a domain name system security platform.
13. The system of claim 12 , wherein the locally-implemented advanced security policy is one of the following policies: Unified Threat Defense (UTD), IPSec/SSL Intrusion Detection and Prevention System (IPS/IDS), Advanced Malware Protection (AMP), Anti-virus Protection (AV), Data Loss Prevention (DLP), Application Firewall (AppFW), or Encrypted Traffic Analytics (ETA).
14. The system of claim 10 ,
wherein the DNS backlist is pre-processed and condensed.
15. The system of claim 10 , wherein the upstream and downstream updates are Overlay Management Protocol (OMP) messages.