IP Library Granted Patent US 11,414,975
Granted Patent B2
US 11,414,975 · App. 16/890,225 · Granted Aug 16, 2022

Quantifying well productivity and near wellbore flow conditions in gas reservoirs

Inventors: Ghazi Dhafer Alqahtani (Dhahran, SA); Shahid Manzoor (Al Kubar, SA); Faisal Alnaseef (Rabwah, SA)
Assignee: Saudi Arabian Oil Company
E21B43/30G01V99/005G06F30/20G06Q10/04
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,414,975
App. No.
16/890,225
Granted
Aug 16, 2022
Kind
B2
Abstract

Simulation model cells of a reservoir having gas condensate production from layers of a subsurface hydrocarbon reservoir are determined by the Total Dynamic Productivity Index (TDPI) method. The determinations are based on rock and fluid physics, including non-Darcy flow and pseudo-pressure integral, which are responsible for pressure drop near wellbores in the gas condensate wells. A three-dimensional (3D) grid matrix is linked with a well placement optimization algorithm to target high gas energy spots and increase productivity, efficiency and recovery from the gas condensate wells.

Claims (38)

1. A wells placement analysis system for a reservoir having gas condensate production from layers of a subsurface hydrocarbon reservoir, the system comprising:

one or more processors;

one or more input/output units adapted to be in communication with the one or more processors;

one or more databases adapted to store and associate a plurality of reservoir metrics with a plurality of coordinates and reservoir metrics to thereby define one or more reservoir databases, the one or more reservoir databases in communication with the one or more processors;

one or more non-transitory computer-readable mediums positioned in communication with the one or more processors and having one or more computer programs stored thereon including a set of instructions that when executed by one or more processors cause the one or more processors to perform operations of:

generating a plurality of assessment gas condensate wells having specified production constraints at specified locations through at least one layer of the reservoir layers, the specified locations having X n ×Y n ×Z n coordinates;

performing a numerical simulation of productivity in the formation layers of a selected well set comprising one or more of the plurality of assessment gas condensate wells;

determining pseudo-pressure conditions in grid cells adjacent the selected gas condensate well set at the X n ×Y n ×Z n coordinates of the at least one of the layers;

determining non-Darcy flow conditions in the grid cells adjacent the selected gas condensate well set at the X n ×Y n ×Z n coordinates of the at least one of the layers, based on the determined pseudo-pressure conditions in the grid cells;

determining a productivity index for the selected gas condensate well based on the determined pseudo-pressure conditions and the determined non-Darcy flow conditions at the X n ×Y n ×Z n coordinates of the at least one of the layers;

determining a total dynamic productivity index for the at least one layer for the selected gas condensate well set over a time interval of interest;

determining placement of the assessment gas condensate well set for the reservoir based on the determined the total dynamic productivity index for the assessment gas condensate well set; and

generating a production analysis report for the reservoir, the production analysis report including an proposed well placement for the assessment gas condensate well set.

2. The well placement system of claim 1 , wherein the at least one processor further performs operations of:

determining a layer productivity index subject to defined well production conditions; and

determining a total dynamic productivity index subject to defined well production conditions.

3. The well placement system of claim 1 , wherein the at least one processor further performs operations of:

determining a layer productivity index for a specified simulation run time; and

determining a total dynamic productivity index for the specified simulation run time.

4. The well placement system of claim 1 , wherein the at least one processor further performs operations of:

determining a layer productivity index in a number of simulation runs according to a reservoir layout based on well spacing; and

determining a total dynamic productivity index in the number of simulation runs according to the reservoir layout based on well spacing.

5. The well placement system of claim 1 , wherein the at least one processor further performs operations of:

generating a well placement map using the determined total dynamic productivity index for the at least one layer.

6. A computer-implemented method of wells placement analysis for a reservoir having gas condensate production from layers of a subsurface hydrocarbon reservoir, the computer-implemented method comprising the steps of:

generating a plurality of assessment gas condensate wells having specified production constraints at specified locations through at least one layer of the reservoir layers, the specified locations having X n ×Y n ×Z n coordinates;

performing a numerical simulation of productivity in the formation layers of a selected well set comprising one or more of the plurality of assessment gas condensate wells;

determining pseudo-pressure conditions in grid cells adjacent the selected gas condensate well set at the X n ×Y n ×Z n coordinates of the at least one of the layers;

determining non-Darcy flow conditions in the grid cells adjacent the selected gas condensate well set at the X n ×Y n ×Z n coordinates of the at least one of the layers, based on the determined pseudo-pressure conditions in the grid cells;

determining a productivity index for the selected gas condensate well based on the determined pseudo-pressure conditions and the determined non-Darcy flow conditions at the X n ×Y n ×Z n coordinates of the at least one of the layers;

determining a total dynamic productivity index for the at least one layer for the selected gas condensate well set over a time interval of interest;

determining placement of the assessment gas condensate well set for the reservoir based on the determined the total dynamic productivity index for the assessment gas condensate well set; and

generating a production analysis report for the reservoir, the production analysis report including a proposed well placement for the assessment gas condensate well set.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 6 , wherein the steps of determining a layer productivity index and determining a total dynamic productivity index are performed subject to defined well production conditions.

8. The computer-implemented method of claim 6 , wherein the steps of determining a layer productivity index and determining a total dynamic productivity index are performed for a specified simulation run time.

9. The computer-implemented method of claim 6 , wherein the steps of determining a layer productivity index and determining a total dynamic productivity index are performed in a number of simulation runs according to a reservoir layout based on well spacing.

10. The computer-implemented method of claim 6 , further including the step of:

generating, by one or more processors, a well placement map using the determined total dynamic productivity index for the at least one layer.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 2, 2020
From: ALQAHTANI, GHAZI DHAFER; MANZOOR, SHAHID; ALNASEEF, FAISAL H
To: SAUDI ARABIAN OIL COMPANY
Reel/Frame 052810/0264 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation In Part 15807976 · Nov 9, 2017
Continuation In Part 14330324 · Jul 14, 2014
Related Publication 20200318468A1 · Oct 8, 2020