IP Library › Granted Patent US 11,434,764
Granted Patent B2
US 11,434,764 · App. 16/520,951 · Granted Sep 6, 2022

Process for repairing turbine engine components

Inventors: Robert J. Morris (Portland, CT); William D. Owen (Windsor, CT); Stuart K. Montgomery (Jupiter, FL); Ron I. Prihar (West Hartford, CT)
Assignee: Raytheon Technologies Corporation
F01D5/005F01D5/021F05D2230/10F05D2230/80
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,434,764
App. No.
16/520,951
Granted
Sep 6, 2022
Kind
B2
Abstract

A process for repairing an aircraft engine component includes receiving a plurality of component measurements of a damaged component, comparing the plurality of component measurements of the damaged component to a finite element model of an ideal component, generating a finite element model of the damaged component based at least partially on the comparison, determining a corrective material removal operation based at least in part on the finite element model of the damaged component, and removing material from the damaged component according to the corrective material removal operation, thereby creating a repaired component.

Claims (28)

1. A process for repairing an aircraft engine component comprising:

receiving a plurality of component measurements of a damaged component;

comparing the plurality of component measurements of the damaged component to a finite element model of an ideal component, and generating a finite element model of the damaged component based at least partially on the comparison;

determining a blend operation based at least in part on the finite element model of the damaged component, the blend operation comprising determining a distinct blend for each of multiple wear spots;

predicting a performance of an expected repaired component by providing the finite element model of the damaged component and the blend operation to a mathematical model; and

removing material from the damaged component according to the blend operation, thereby creating an actual repaired component;

determining a plurality of component measurements of the actual repaired component and comparing the plurality of component measurements of the repaired component to the finite element model of the ideal component, thereby determining a finite element model of the actual repaired component; and

analyzing the finite element model of the repaired component by providing the finite element model of the repaired component the mathematical model.

2. The process of claim 1 , wherein the damaged component is an integrally bladed rotor.

3. The process of claim 1 , wherein determining the blend operation comprises creating a material removal template and applying the material removal template to the damaged component prior to removing material from the damage component.

4. The process of claim 1 , wherein removing material from the damaged component according to the blend operation comprises an automated material removal operation.

5. The process of claim 1 , wherein removing material from the damaged component according to the blend operation comprises a manual material removal operation.

6. The process of claim 1 , wherein the repaired component includes a blade, and wherein the distinct blends cover at least 5% of the surface of the blade.

7. The process of claim 1 , wherein the repaired component includes at least one blend extending into the repaired component by at least 3 mm (0.118 in).

8. The process of claim 1 , further comprising comparing a result of providing the finite element model of the damaged component and the blend operation to the mathematical model against a predetermined set of criteria, and determining the acceptability of the blend operation based at least in part on the output of the mathematical model.

9. The process of claim 8 , wherein determining the acceptability of the blend operation includes comparing the output of the mathematical model to at least one of a mistuning range, an aeromechanical performance metric range, and a modeshape range.

10. The process of claim 1 , wherein the repaired component includes a plurality of blades extending radially outward from a hub and at least one of the multiple wear spots is disposed on the hub.

11. The process of claim 10 , wherein at least one of the multiple wear spots is disposed on a blade in the plurality of blades.

12. The process of claim 1 , wherein analyzing the finite element model of the repaired component comprises, comparing a result of providing the finite element model of the repaired component to the mathematical model against a predetermined set of criteria, and determining the acceptability of the blend operation based at least in part on the output of the mathematical model.

13. The process of claim 12 , wherein determining the acceptability of the blend operation includes comparing the output of the mathematical model to at least one of a mistuning range, an aeromechanical performance metric range, and a modeshape range.

14. A process for repairing an integrally bladed rotor comprising:

removing material from the damaged integrally bladed rotor according to the blend operation, thereby creating a repaired integrally bladed rotor, in response to the simulation meeting the predetermined criteria;

determining a plurality of component measurements of the repaired integrally bladed rotor and comparing the plurality of component measurements of the repaired integrally bladed rotor to the finite element model of the ideal integrally bladed rotor, thereby determining a finite element model of the repaired integrally bladed rotor; and

analyzing the finite element model of the repaired integrally bladed rotor by providing the finite element model of the repaired integrally bladed rotor to a mathematical model.

15. The process of claim 14 , wherein determining the blend operation comprises creating a material removal template and applying the material removal template to the damaged integrally bladed rotor prior to removing material from the damaged integrally bladed rotor.

16. The process of claim 14 , wherein the predetermined criteria includes at least one of mistuning range, an aeromechanical performance metric range, and a modeshape range.

17. The process of claim 14 , further comprising reiterating the step of determining a blend operation in response to the simulation not meeting at least one of the predetermined criteria.

18. The process of claim 17 , wherein the reiteration further incorporates the results of the corrective finite element model simulation, and wherein the reiteration generates a second blend operation distinct from the first blend operation.

Assignments (3)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jul 27, 2023
From: RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
To: RTX CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 064402/0837 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE AND REMOVE PATENT APPLICATION NUMBER 11886281 AND ADD PATENT APPLICATION NUMBER 14846874. TO CORRECT THE RECEIVING PARTY ADDRESS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 054062 FRAME: 0001. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE CHANGE OF ADDRESS. Recorded Mar 4, 2021
From: UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
To: RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 055659/0001 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Sep 4, 2020
From: UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
To: RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 054062/0001 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62717935 · Aug 13, 2018
Related Publication 20200102827A1 · Apr 2, 2020
Cited By (5)
US 12,291,973 US 12,318,877 US 12,410,711 US 12,523,979 US 12,664,333