Fail-operational VTOL aircraft
An aircraft capable of carrying at least 400 pounds of payload, has four rotors systems, each of the rotor systems being independently driven by an electric motor or other torque-producing source. Each of the rotor systems provide sufficient thrust such that the aircraft is capable of controlled vertical takeoff and landing, even if one of the variable pitch rotor is inoperable. An electronic control system is configured to control the rotational speed and pitch of at least one of the rotor systems in each of the first and second rotor pairs. The rotors may be arranged in coaxial stacks or maybe otherwise configured.
1. An aircraft capable of carrying at least 400 pounds of payload, comprising:
a main body;
first and second coaxial rotor stacks, each having a first variable pitch rotor system and a second variable pitch rotor system rotatable about a substantially common axis of rotation with each of the rotor systems being independently driven by at least a first torque-producing source;
an electronic control system configured to control the rotational speed and the blade pitch of at least the first variable pitch rotor system in each of the first and second coaxial rotor stacks;
a wing mechanically coupled to the main body, wherein the wing has each of a left outboard wing and a right outboard wing configured to independently pivot about a substantially spanwise axis, relative to the main body; and
wherein each of the first and second variable pitch rotor systems in each of the coaxial rotor stacks provide sufficient thrust such that the aircraft is capable of controlled vertical takeoff and landing, even if up to one of the variable pitch rotor systems of each of the coaxial rotor stacks is inoperable.
2. The aircraft of claim 1 , further comprising a tilt mechanism configured to tilt the first coaxial rotor stack by at least 80 degrees.
3. The aircraft of claim 1 , wherein the first and second variable pitch rotor systems in the first coaxial rotor stack are configured to rotate in the same direction.
4. The aircraft of claim 1 , wherein the first and second variable pitch rotor systems in the first coaxial rotor stack are configured to rotate in opposite directions.
5. The aircraft of claim 1 , wherein the first variable pitch rotor system in the first coaxial rotor stack is configured to provide rotor cyclic control.
6. The aircraft of claim 5 , wherein the first variable pitch rotor system in the first coaxial rotor stack comprises rigid blades and hubs configured to apply a mast moment to the aircraft.
7. The aircraft of claim 5 , wherein the first variable pitch rotor system in the first coaxial rotor stack comprises rotor blades with individual blade control.
8. The aircraft of claim 1 , wherein the first torque-producing source is a fuel-consuming engine.
9. The aircraft of claim 1 , wherein the first torque-producing source is a first electric motor.
10. The aircraft of claim 9 , further comprising a gear reduction system operationally coupling the first variable pitch rotor system and the first electric motor.
11. The aircraft of claim 10 , wherein the first variable pitch rotor system in the first coaxial rotor stack is driven by each of the first electric motor and at least a second electric motor through the gear reduction system.
12. The aircraft of claim 1 , further comprising a first mechanical clutch system configured such that at least the first torque-producing source configured to drive the first variable pitch rotor system in the first coaxial rotor stack is configured to drive the second variable pitch rotor system in the first coaxial rotor stack when the first mechanical clutch system is disengaged.
13. The aircraft of claim 1 , wherein the first and second variable pitch rotor systems in each of the first and second coaxial rotor stacks, together with each of the torque-producing sources, and together with the electronic control system are sufficiently sized and configured to enable controlled vertical takeoff and landing without the aid of any additional lift-producing sources, even if up to one of the variable pitch rotor systems of each of the coaxial rotor stacks is inoperable.
14. The aircraft of claim 1 , wherein the first variable pitch rotor system is configured to operate at an RPM level less than 80% of a maximum rotor system RPM level.
15. The aircraft of claim 14 , wherein either the first or second variable pitch rotor is configured to operate at an RPM level less than 60% of a maximum rotor system RPM level.