IP Library › Granted Patent US 11,568,691
Granted Patent B2
US 11,568,691 · App. 17/166,264 · Granted Jan 31, 2023

Key fob isolator

Inventors: Michael B. Jonely (Oak Creek, WI); Scott Kalous (Oak Creek, WI)
Assignee: Master Lock Company LLC
G07C9/00309G07C2009/00404G07C2009/00539G07C2009/00555
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,568,691
App. No.
17/166,264
Granted
Jan 31, 2023
Kind
B2
Abstract

A keysafe includes a housing, a door, a locking mechanism, a wireless communications interface, and an inhibitor system. The housing defines an internal compartment structured to receive a key fob for a vehicle. The door is positioned to enclose the internal compartment. The locking mechanism is positioned to selectively lock the door to prevent access to the internal compartment. The wireless communications interface is configured to facilitate wireless communication with an external device. The inhibitor system includes a coil disposed around the internal compartment, a battery disposed within the housing and coupled to the coil, and a controller. The controller is configured to energize the coil with the battery to inhibit communication between the key fob and the vehicle, receive a deactivation signal from the external device via the wireless communications interface, and de-energize the coil in response to receiving the deactivation signal to permit the communication.

Claims (66)

1. A keysafe comprising:

a housing defining an internal compartment structured to receive a key fob for a vehicle;

a wireless communications interface configured to facilitate wireless communication with an external device;

a user interface disposed along an exterior of the housing; and

an inhibitor system including:

a coil disposed around the internal compartment; and

a controller configured to:

energize the coil to inhibit at least one of:

(i) a vehicle signal transmitted by the vehicle such that (a) the vehicle signal does not reach the key fob or (b) the vehicle signal is unrecognizable by the key fob; or

(ii) a key fob signal transmitted by the key fob such that (a) the key fob signal does not reach the vehicle or (b) the key fob signal is unrecognizable by the vehicle;

receive a deactivation signal from at least one of (i) the external device via the wireless communications interface or (ii) the user interface in response to an input provided thereto; and

de-energize the coil in response to receiving the deactivation signal such that the vehicle signal reaches the key fob in a recognizable form, the key fob transmits the key fob signal to the vehicle in response to the vehicle signal, and the key fob signal reaches the vehicle in a recognizable form.

2. The keysafe of claim 1 , wherein the controller is configured to selectively operate the inhibitor system in an active mode, and wherein, during the active mode, the controller is configured to actively energize the coil to inhibit the vehicle signal such that (a) the vehicle signal does not reach the key fob or (b) the vehicle signal is unrecognizable by the key fob and, therefore, the key fob does not transmit the key fob signal.

3. The keysafe of claim 1 , wherein the controller is configured to selectively operate the inhibitor system in a reactive mode, and wherein, during the reactive mode, the controller is configured to:

detect the vehicle signal transmitted by the vehicle; and

reactively energize the coil to inhibit the vehicle signal such that (a) the vehicle signal does not reach the key fob or (b) the vehicle signal is unrecognizable by the key fob and, therefore, the key fob does not transmit the key fob signal.

4. The keysafe of claim 1 , wherein the controller is configured to selectively operate the inhibitor system in a reactive mode, and wherein, during the reactive mode, the controller is configured to:

detect the vehicle signal transmitted by the vehicle; and

reactively energize the coil to inhibit the key fob signal such that (a) the key fob signal does not reach the vehicle or (b) the key fob signal is unrecognizable by the vehicle and, therefore, the vehicle does not act on the key fob signal.

5. The keysafe of claim 1 , wherein the vehicle signal includes a door unlock request signal and a vehicle start request signal, wherein the key fob signal includes a door unlock response signal and a vehicle start response signal, wherein the controller is configured to selectively operate the inhibitor system in a reactive mode, and wherein, during the reactive mode, the controller is configured to:

detect the door unlock request signal transmitted by the vehicle;

allow the key fob to transmit the door unlock response signal such that doors of the vehicle unlock; and

energize the coil to inhibit the vehicle start request signal such that (a) the vehicle start request signal does not reach the key fob or (b) the vehicle start request signal is unrecognizable by the key fob and, therefore, the key fob does not transmit the vehicle start response signal to the vehicle.

6. The keysafe of claim 1 , further comprising a door positioned to enclose the internal compartment and a locking mechanism positioned to selectively lock the door to prevent access to the internal compartment, wherein the controller is configured to receive an unlock signal from at least one of (i) the external device via the wireless communications interface or (ii) the user interface in response to a second input provided thereto, wherein the unlock signal provided by the external device requires a different permission level than the deactivation signal.

7. The keysafe of claim 1 , wherein the vehicle signal is at least one of a door unlock request or a vehicle start request.

8. The keysafe of claim 1 , wherein the controller is configured to receive the deactivation signal from the external device via the wireless communications interface.

9. The keysafe of claim 1 , wherein the controller is configured to receive the deactivation signal from the user interface in response to the input provided thereto.

10. The keysafe of claim 1 , further comprising a battery disposed within the housing and coupled to the coil.

11. The keysafe of claim 1 , wherein the keysafe is configured to be hardwired to a power source of the vehicle.

12. The keysafe of claim 1 , wherein the external device is a portable device.

13. The keysafe of claim 1 , wherein the external device is a remote server.

14. The keysafe of claim 1 , wherein the external device is the vehicle, and wherein the vehicle acts as an intermediary between the wireless communications interface and a remote server.

15. A keysafe comprising:

a housing defining an internal compartment structured to receive a key fob for a vehicle;

a door positioned to enclose the internal compartment;

an inhibitor positioned to facilitate selectively inhibiting communication between the key fob and the vehicle; and

a controller configured to control the inhibitor;

wherein the inhibitor is operable in a first mode where communication between the key fob and the vehicle is inhibited;

wherein the inhibitor is operable in a second mode where the communication between the key fob and the vehicle is permitted;

wherein the inhibitor includes a passive shielding material and an actuator positioned to open and close the door;

wherein the controller is configured to keep the door closed to inhibit the communication during the first mode; and

wherein the controller is configured to at least one of (i) engage the actuator to open the door to permit the communication during the second mode or (ii) engage the actuator to close the door when returning to the first mode from the second mode.

16. A keysafe comprising:

a housing defining an internal compartment structured to receive a key fob for a vehicle;

a door positioned to enclose the internal compartment;

an inhibitor positioned to facilitate selectively inhibiting communication between the key fob and the vehicle; and

a controller configured to control the inhibitor;

wherein the inhibitor is operable in a first mode where communication between the key fob and the vehicle is inhibited;

wherein the inhibitor is operable in a second mode where the communication between the key fob and the vehicle is permitted;

wherein the inhibitor includes a coil disposed around the internal compartment and a battery configured to facilitate energizing the coil;

wherein the controller is configured to energize the coil with the battery to inhibit the communication during the first mode; and

wherein the controller is configured to de-energize the coil to permit the communication during the second mode.

17. The keysafe of claim 16 , wherein the first mode is an active mode, and wherein, during the active mode, the controller is configured to actively energize the coil to inhibit the communication.

18. The keysafe of claim 16 , wherein the first mode is a reactive mode, and wherein, during the reactive mode, the controller is configured to reactively energize the coil to inhibit the communication in response to detecting a signal transmitted by the vehicle.

19. A keysafe comprising:

a housing defining an internal compartment structured to receive a key fob for a vehicle;

a door positioned to enclose the internal compartment;

a locking mechanism positioned to selectively lock the door to prevent access to the internal compartment;

a wireless communications interface configured to facilitate wireless communication with an external device; and

an inhibitor system including:

a coil disposed around the internal compartment;

a battery disposed within the housing and coupled to the coil; and

a controller configured to:

energize the coil with the battery to inhibit communication between the key fob and the vehicle;

receive a deactivation signal from the external device via the wireless communications interface; and

de-energize the coil in response to receiving the deactivation signal to permit the communication.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 8, 2021
From: JONELY, MICHAEL B.; KALOUS, SCOTT
To: MASTER LOCK COMPANY LLC
Reel/Frame 055179/0260 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 3, 2021
From: JONELY, MICHAEL B.; KALOUS, SCOTT
To: MASTER LOCK COMPANY LLC
Reel/Frame 055209/0691 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62970665 · Feb 5, 2020
Related Publication 20210241552A1 · Aug 5, 2021