IP Library Granted Patent US 11,633,918
Granted Patent B2
US 11,633,918 · App. 16/722,159 · Granted Apr 25, 2023

Method and device for additive manufacturing utilizing simulation test results of a workpiece

Inventors: Michael Totzeck (Schwaebisch Gmuend, DE); Danny Krautz (Berlin, DE); Diana Spengler (Aalen, DE); Uwe Wolf (Magdala, DE); Christoph-Hilmar Graf Vom Hagen (Oakland, CA); Christian Holzner (Wettringen, DE); Lars Omlor (Pleasanton, CA)
Assignee: Carl Zeiss Industrielle Messtechnik GmbH
B29C64/393B29C64/153B29C64/188B29C64/268B33Y10/00B33Y30/00B33Y40/00B33Y50/02
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,633,918
App. No.
16/722,159
Granted
Apr 25, 2023
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods and devices for additive manufacturing of workpieces are provided. For analysis during production, a test is carried out using a selected test method. The test results are compared with simulated test results derived during a simulation of the manufacturing and testing. The test may use one or more of a laser ultrasound test unit, an electronic laser speckle interferometry test unit, an infrared thermography test unit, or an x-ray test unit.

Claims (36)

1. A method for additive manufacturing, the method comprising:

obtaining manufacturing data for a workpiece, wherein the manufacturing data defines a plurality of layers of the workpiece;

simulating additive manufacturing of the workpiece using the manufacturing data, thereby creating a simulated workpiece having a plurality of simulated layers;

simulating measurement of the plurality of simulated layers in order to determine simulated test results for the workpiece;

physically producing a set of layers of the plurality of layers using an additive manufacturing process according to the manufacturing data;

measuring the produced set of layers in order to obtain measured test results for the workpiece;

evaluating the measured test results using the simulated test results to determine whether manufacturing is acceptable;

in response to the evaluating indicating acceptable manufacturing, repeating the physically producing, the measuring, and the evaluating for further sets of layers of the plurality of layers; and

in response to the evaluating indicating unacceptable manufacturing, performing a remedial measure.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the evaluating comprises supplying the measured test results and the simulated test results to a trained machine learning model.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the evaluating comprises comparing the simulated test results with the measured test results.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the remedial measure comprises changing process parameters for physically producing subsequent sets of layers.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the remedial measure comprises rejecting the workpiece.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the set of layers comprises at least one of a single layer, a plurality of layers, and a partial layer.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the evaluating comprises using a predefined correlation of differences between the measured test results and the simulated test results with component properties.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the measuring comprises carrying out a laser ultrasound process on the produced set of layers.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein:

the physically producing is performed in a powder bed comprising a powder material,

the laser ultrasound process uses a laser beam having a pulse frequency of less than f max =v M /(d M +s M ),

v M is a speed of sound in the powder material,

d M is a mean particle diameter of the powder material, and

s M is a standard deviation of a size distribution of particles of the powder material.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the measuring comprises carrying out electronic laser speckle interferometry.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the measuring comprises carrying out infrared thermography.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein the measuring comprises carrying out an x-ray examination.

13. A device for additive manufacturing, the device comprising:

a simulation device configured to:

simulate additive manufacturing of a workpiece and

simulate test results during manufacturing in order to determine simulated test results for the workpiece;

a manufacturing device configured to perform additive manufacturing of the workpiece layer by layer; and

a test device configured to test the workpiece during the additive manufacturing in order to obtain measured test results,

wherein the test device is configured to test the workpiece during manufacturing in order to determine measured test results and

wherein the simulation device is configured to

evaluate the measured test results using the simulated test results and

perform a remedial measure in response to the evaluation indicating unacceptable manufacturing of the workpiece.

14. The device of claim 13 , wherein the test device comprises at least one of a laser ultrasound test device, an electronic laser speckle interferometry test device, an infrared thermography test device, and an x-ray test device.

Assignments (9)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 26, 2021
From: CARL ZEISS X-RAY MICROSCOPY INC., USA
To: CARL ZEISS AG
Reel/Frame 056035/0794 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 26, 2021
From: CARL ZEISS SMT GMBH
To: CARL ZEISS AG
Reel/Frame 056036/0825 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 4, 2020
From: CARL ZEISS AG
To: CARL ZEISS INDUSTRIELLE MESSTECHNIK GMBH
Reel/Frame 054299/0518 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNMENT TYPE AND EFFECTIVE DATE PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 053581 FRAME: 0269. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE NUN PRO TUNC. Recorded Aug 27, 2020
From: HAGEN, CHRISTOPH-HILMAR GRAF VOM; HOLZNER, CHRISTIAN
To: CARL ZEISS X-RAY MICROSCOPY, INC.
Reel/Frame 053626/0119 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNMENT TO NUNC PRO TUNC ASSIGNMENT PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 053581 FRAME: 0257. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE NUNC PRO TUNC ASSIGNMENT . Recorded Aug 27, 2020
From: SPENGLER, DIANA
To: CARL ZEISS SMT GMBH
Reel/Frame 053626/0241 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNMENT TYPE FROM ASSIGNMENT TO NUNC PRO TUNC ASSIGNMENT PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 053581 FRAME 0266. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE NUNC PRO TUNC ASSIGNMENT WITH EFFECTIVE DATE JUNE 18, 2018. Recorded Aug 27, 2020
From: TOTZECK, MICHAEL; KRAUTZ, DANNY; WOLF, UWE; OMLOR, LARS
To: CARL ZEISS AG
Reel/Frame 053626/0594 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 25, 2020
From: TOTZECK, MICHAEL; KRAUTZ, DANNY; WOLF, UWE; OMLOR, LARS
To: CARL ZEISS AG
Reel/Frame 053581/0266 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 25, 2020
From: HAGEN, CHRISTOPH-HILMAR GRAF VOM; HOLZNER, CHRISTIAN
To: CARL ZEISS X-RAY MICROSCOPY, INC.
Reel/Frame 053581/0269 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 25, 2020
From: SPENGLER, DIANA
To: CARL ZEISS SMT GMBH
Reel/Frame 053581/0257 →
Priority Claims (2)
DE 10 2017 210 330.2 · Jun 20, 2017 · national
DE 10 2017 124 100.0 · Oct 17, 2017 · national
Continuity (2)
Continuation PCTEP2018066304 · Jun 19, 2018
Related Publication 20200223146A1 · Jul 16, 2020
Cited By (1)
US 12,708,942